# Inkling vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL (slim)

> Inkling scores 64.7 (B) to MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inkling-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.md (~9,050 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inkling-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inkling-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash-rl
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Inkling scores 64.7 (B) on agent readiness against MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Inkling: B 64.7, rank #19 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/inkling.min.md
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL: C 61, rank #75 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mimo-v2-6-flash-rl.min.md
- Inkling, good for Agents calling a hosted open multimodal model with audio input, or teams with a multi-GPU datacentre node who want to run it themselves. Ahead on Risk, 70 against 45; Documentation and upkeep, 87 against 59.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL, good for Teams with a GPU server, or a provider account, that want an open agent model with a very long context Ahead on Reach, 65 against 50.

| Category | Inkling | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 50 | 65 |
| Risk (20%) | 70 | 45 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 87 | 59 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Inkling | MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Thinking Machines Lab | Xiaomi (MiMo team) |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT (metadata only, no LICENSE file) |
| Last release | 2026-07-23 | 2026-10-28 |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, Inkling +28: Inkling 87 (Model card 17 of 20, everything but a dated knowledge cut-off, counting Thinking Machines' own model card page.); MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 59 (Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card.)
- Risk, Inkling +25: Inkling 70 (File safety 25, safetensors only and no repository code to run.); MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 45 (File safety 5, the weights are safetensors, but the dflash folder's mask_embedding.pt is a pickle beside them (15).)
- Reach, MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL +15: Inkling 50 (Memory 0 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is Thinking Machines' NVFP4 at 592.0 GB, about 710 GB with a fifth added, far above 256 GB.); MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL 65 (Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits or better is ggml-org's MXFP4 GGUF, 168.93 GB with its projector, and 168.93 GB × 1.2 = 202.7 GB, within 256 GB.)