# Inkling vs Inkling-Small (slim)

> Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) to Inkling's 64.2 (B) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inkling-vs-inkling-small.md (~5,900 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inkling-vs-inkling-small.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inkling-vs-inkling-small
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Inkling's 64.2 (B), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Inkling: B 64.2, rank #20 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/inkling.min.md
- Inkling-Small: B 66.5, rank #14 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/inkling-small.min.md
- Inkling, good for Agents calling a hosted open multimodal model with audio input, or teams with a multi-GPU datacentre node who want to run it themselves.
- Inkling-Small, good for Teams with 256 GB or more of datacentre GPU memory who want an open multimodal agent model with audio input and adjustable thinking. Ahead on Reach, 55 against 50. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 3.0 out of 5.

| Category | Inkling | Inkling-Small |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 60 | 63 |
| Reach (25%) | 50 | 55 |
| Risk (20%) | 70 | 70 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 82 | 82 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Inkling | Inkling-Small |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Last release | 2026-07-23 | 2026-07-31 |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |