{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "infisical", "name": "Infisical", "vendor": "Infisical", "vendorUrl": "https://infisical.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "secrets", "summary": "Open-source secrets manager with machine identities (Universal Auth, OIDC, AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, SPIFFE), dynamic secrets, rotation and audit logs, hosted in the US or EU or self-hosted.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/infisical", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/infisical.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/infisical.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/infisical.json", "repo": "https://github.com/Infisical/infisical", "license": "MIT (core), proprietary under ee/", "transports": [ "http", "streamable-http", "stdio" ], "remoteUrl": "https://app.infisical.com/api", "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@infisical/sdk" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "infisicalsdk" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@infisical/cli" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@infisical/mcp" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "Machine identities log in with Universal Auth (client ID and secret posted to /api/v1/auth/universal-auth/login), Token Auth, OIDC, JWT, or native AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes, OCI, AliCloud, LDAP, TLS certificate or SPIFFE auth, and get a short-lived access token (`st.…`, default TTL 7,200 s) sent as a Bearer header. Revoke it at /api/v1/auth/token/revoke. Agent Vault sessions use a separate session token that only works against the proxy. The docs MCP server at infisical.com/docs/mcp needs no auth.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "Free, Pro, Advanced and Enterprise plans on Infisical Cloud. Free is $0 with 5 identities, 3 environments, no audit logs, no rotation and no dynamic secrets, and needs no card. Pro is $20 per identity a month billed yearly ($23 monthly) with 30-day audit logs and rotation. Advanced is $40 per identity a month billed yearly ($46 monthly) with 90-day audit logs, dynamic secrets and higher rate limits. Pro and Advanced trials need no card. Enterprise is custom, with custom audit retention and rate limits and a 99.99 per cent monthly availability SLA with service credits (https://infisical.com/sla). Agent Proxy is on Free and Pro for static secrets, and Agent Proxy for dynamic secrets is listed as coming soon. Cloud rate limits are per client IP, 600 requests a minute overall, then Free 200 reads, 90 writes and 120 secret operations a minute, Pro 350, 200 and 300. Self-hosting the MIT core is free with no rate limits; the code under ee/ needs an Enterprise licence (https://infisical.com/pricing, https://infisical.com/docs/api-reference/overview/rate-limits).", "priceSummary": "Freemium", "where": "both", "x402": { "level": "no", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 10, "popularity": { "githubStars": 28405, "npmWeekly": 305133, "pypiWeekly": 391329, "asOf": "2026-09-30" }, "docsUrl": "https://infisical.com/docs", "llmsTxt": "https://infisical.com/docs/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://app.infisical.com/api/docs/json", "capabilities": [ "secrets.store", "secrets.rotate", "secrets.machine-identity", "secrets.audit", "secrets.self-host", "auth.agent-identity" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "self-hosted", "open-source", "freemium", "free-tier", "mcp", "llms-txt", "openapi", "typescript", "python", "go", "enterprise", "eu" ], "lastRelease": "2026-09-23", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 83.7, "grade": "A", "agentReady": true, "rank": 2, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 722, "categoryRank": 1, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 91, "maintenance": 90, "payments": 30, "reliability": 100, "schema": 87, "security": 91, "transparency": 83 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-04" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Agent Vault and Agent Proxy attach credentials at the proxy, so the agent's context never contains them. Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month.", "bestFor": "Teams that want an open-source secrets manager they can self-host, and for coding agents run under Agent Vault so they call APIs without ever holding a token.", "strengths": [ "Agent Vault and Agent Proxy attach credentials at the proxy, so the agent's context never contains them", "Thirteen machine identity auth methods with short-lived, revocable access tokens", "MIT core that self-hosts with no API rate limits, plus US and EU cloud regions", "Official MCP server with 10 annotated tools, a tool allowlist and optional value masking", "48 tagged releases between 3 July and 23 September 2026, each with an upgrade-impact note" ], "weaknesses": [ "Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month", "Cloud rate limits are per client IP, so agents behind one NAT share 600 requests a minute", "The MCP server returns secret values unless INFISICAL_MASK_SECRET_VALUES is set, and it's still version 0.0.x", "Agent Vault session tokens travel to the proxy unencrypted, and the feature sits under the proprietary ee/ licence", "The published 99.99 per cent SLA covers Enterprise only, and every listed subprocessor is in the United States despite the EU region" ], "agentNotes": [ "Run a coding agent under `infisical agent-vault run` with a bundle that allows only the hosts, methods and paths it needs, and set --ttl to the job length", "Start @infisical/mcp with INFISICAL_ENABLED_TOOLS=list-projects,list-secrets,get-secret and INFISICAL_MASK_SECRET_VALUES=true unless the model must see a value", "Log in once with Universal Auth and keep the access token for its TTL, since identity logins count against the per-IP write limit", "Pass viewSecretValue=false to GET /api/v4/secrets when you only need names, and expandSecretReferences=true when values reference other secrets", "On a 429 read the seconds from the message field and wait that long; don't retry a POST after a 5xx without checking it didn't land" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 8, "avgRating": 3.8, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "A", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 83.7 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 91, "maintenance": 90, "payments": 30, "reliability": 100, "schema": 87, "security": 91, "transparency": 77 }, "provenanceScore": 89 }, "connect": { "install": "npm install @infisical/sdk # or: pip install infisicalsdk, brew install infisical/get-cli/infisical", "http": "curl -G https://app.infisical.com/api/v4/secrets -H \"Authorization: Bearer $INFISICAL_TOKEN\" \\\n --data-urlencode \"projectId=$INFISICAL_PROJECT_ID\" --data-urlencode \"environment=prod\" --data-urlencode \"secretPath=/\"", "claudeCode": "claude mcp add infisical -e INFISICAL_UNIVERSAL_AUTH_CLIENT_ID=$INFISICAL_CLIENT_ID -e INFISICAL_UNIVERSAL_AUTH_CLIENT_SECRET=$INFISICAL_CLIENT_SECRET -e INFISICAL_ENABLED_TOOLS=list-projects,list-secrets,get-secret -- npx -y @infisical/mcp", "config": { "mcpServers": { "infisical": { "args": [ "-y", "@infisical/mcp" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "INFISICAL_ENABLED_TOOLS": "list-projects,list-secrets,get-secret", "INFISICAL_UNIVERSAL_AUTH_CLIENT_ID": "${INFISICAL_CLIENT_ID}", "INFISICAL_UNIVERSAL_AUTH_CLIENT_SECRET": "${INFISICAL_CLIENT_SECRET}" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/secrets.store", "tool": "https://letme.dev/infisical" }, "area": "agent-runtime", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Infisical, Inc.", "domain": "infisical.com", "domainRegistered": "2022-07-06", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://infisical.com/terms", "privacy": "https://infisical.com/privacy", "statusPage": "https://status.infisical.com", "changelog": "https://github.com/Infisical/infisical/releases", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-10-04", "notes": [ "The privacy policy (last updated 15 September 2025) names Infisical, Inc. without a postal address and links a subprocessor list dated 9 September 2026 with 17 entries, all in the United States.", "security.txt expires 2027-08-01 and points to a Bugcrowd disclosure programme; a paid bounty is private and invitation-only.", "The docs changelog stops at July 2025; releases since then are tagged on GitHub with generated notes and an upgrade-impact file per release in the repository.", "status.infisical.com runs on incident.io and showed only a planned maintenance on 23 July 2026 between July and 4 October 2026.", "The terms hub at infisical.com/terms links a Service Level Agreement (https://infisical.com/sla) for Enterprise Cloud customers at 99.99 per cent monthly availability, and a Data Processing Agreement dated 25 August 2026." ], "score": 89 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/infisical.json", "live": { "slug": "infisical", "probe": { "target": "https://app.infisical.com/api", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-10-08T21:12:12.448794544Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 404, "lastMs": 253, "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 258, "p95ms24h": 340, "samples24h": 271, "samples30d": 1955, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-01", "probes": 109, "ok": 109 }, { "date": "2026-10-02", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-03", "probes": 271, "ok": 271 }, { "date": "2026-10-04", "probes": 272, "ok": 272 }, { "date": "2026-10-05", "probes": 272, "ok": 272 }, { "date": "2026-10-06", "probes": 272, "ok": 272 }, { "date": "2026-10-07", "probes": 272, "ok": 272 }, { "date": "2026-10-08", "probes": 239, "ok": 239 } ] }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.infisical.com", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T21:06:08.719174642Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "Infisical/infisical", "version": "v0.166.2", "released": "2026-10-07", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:16:39.574418723Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@infisical/cli", "version": "0.43.140", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:16:37.358917779Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@infisical/mcp", "version": "0.0.24", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:16:37.59146817Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@infisical/sdk", "version": "5.0.2", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:16:33.861068105Z" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "infisicalsdk", "version": "1.0.17", "released": "2026-08-17", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:16:37.165963574Z" } ], "githubStars": 29658, "npmWeekly": 361155, "pypiWeekly": 416560, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://infisical.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "valid", "expires": "2027-08-01T00:00:00.000Z", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T15:38:57.478977488Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://infisical.com/docs/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T14:00:32.486901201Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "infisical.com", "registered": "2022-07-06", "source": "https://rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/infisical.com", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T13:05:56.955224704Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://infisical.com/pricing", "kind": "pricing", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:20:58.195082886Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-08T18:20:58.195082886Z", "fingerprint": "e9e83ccd8836" }, { "url": "https://infisical.com/privacy", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:21:00.392605434Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-08T18:21:00.392605434Z", "fingerprint": "943f2ed7530d" }, { "url": "https://infisical.com/terms", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:21:02.465704013Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-08T18:21:02.465704013Z", "fingerprint": "7b02254c4233" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-08T21:12:12.448794544Z" } }, "answer": "Infisical scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.", "b": { "slug": "keeper-secrets-manager", "name": "Keeper Secrets Manager", "vendor": "Keeper Security, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://www.keepersecurity.com/secrets-manager.html", "kind": "http-api", "category": "secrets", "summary": "Keeper Secrets Manager is a cloud vault for infrastructure secrets, sold as an add-on to Keeper Security's business password manager. Applications read secrets through SDKs in seven languages, the `ksm` CLI or a local MCP server, decrypting on the client.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keeper-secrets-manager", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.json", "repo": "https://github.com/Keeper-Security/secrets-manager", "license": "Proprietary service under Keeper's SaaS Terms of Use. The SDKs, CLI, MCP server and agent kit on GitHub are MIT", "transports": [ "http", "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "keeper-secrets-manager-core" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "keeper-secrets-manager-cli" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@keeper-security/secrets-manager-core" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Access is granted by a person. A vault user whose role allows it creates a Secrets Manager application, shares folders or records with it, and adds a client device, which yields a one-time access token or a Base64 configuration. The client redeems the token once, registers its own ECC public key and signs every later request with the private key, so no bearer secret is reused. Devices are IP-locked by default, can be given an access expiry and are revoked individually.", "pricing": "paid", "pricingNotes": "Secrets Manager is an add-on to Keeper's business password manager plans, licensed per user per year, and included with KeeperPAM. The add-ons page shows Custom Pricing and Request a Quote for it, so there is no public figure. A 14-day business trial needs no credit card and can enable Secrets Manager, so an agent's owner can start without a contract. Base plan prices are drawn by script and were blank to our reader (https://www.keepersecurity.com/pricing/business-add-ons/, https://www.keepersecurity.com/trial/keeper-free-trial/, checked 2026-10-08).", "priceSummary": "Paid", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the Secrets Manager docs, the SDK repository or the pricing pages (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 19, "popularity": { "githubStars": 117, "npmWeekly": 52332, "pypiWeekly": 45154, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.keeper.io/en/keeperpam/secrets-manager/overview", "llmsTxt": "https://docs.keeper.io/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "secrets.store", "secrets.machine-identity", "secrets.audit", "secrets.rotate" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "enterprise", "zero-knowledge", "mcp", "cli", "python", "javascript", "java", "go", "dotnet", "ruby", "rust", "llms-txt", "sales-led", "status-page", "bug-bounty", "soc2", "fedramp" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-06", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 69.4, "grade": "B", "agentReady": false, "rank": 159, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 722, "categoryRank": 9, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 63, "maintenance": 92, "payments": 20, "reliability": 76, "schema": 71, "security": 86, "transparency": 78 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Each client device signs requests with its own key, is locked to an IP address by default and can be revoked alone, and secrets decrypt only on the client. The add-on has no public price, no request limits were found in the reviewed documentation, and a person must create the application and device in the vault.", "bestFor": "Companies already on Keeper's business vault that want per-device machine identities with client-side decryption and an official MCP server.", "strengths": [ "Each device registers its own ECC key from a one-time token, is IP-locked by default and can be revoked alone", "Secrets decrypt on the client. Keeper's cloud stores and sends ciphertext only, per the encryption model page", "An application sees only the shared folders and records assigned to it, read-only unless shared as editable", "Official MIT MCP server with 19 typed tools, masked values by default and confirmation for writes, deletes and unmasking", "SDKs for Python, Java, JavaScript, .NET, Go, Ruby and Rust in one MIT repository, with 5 tagged releases since 15 September 2026" ], "weaknesses": [ "Secrets Manager is priced by quote. The add-ons page shows Custom Pricing and Request a Quote", "No request limits were found in the reviewed documentation. Throttling arrives as HTTP 403 with `{\"error\":\"throttled\"}`", "No OpenAPI or documented raw HTTP use for `/api/rest/sm/v1`. The SDKs are the only supported route", "The Node MCP guide links a GitHub repository that returned 404 on 8 October 2026", "Rotation needs a KeeperPAM licence and a Keeper Gateway, and access events are read in the separately sold reporting module" ], "agentNotes": [ "Ask the vault owner for a new device on an application that holds only the folders the task needs. Use the Base64 configuration, not the first one-time token", "Run commands under `ksm exec` so secrets arrive as environment variables and stay out of the model's context", "Expect HTTP 403 with `{\"error\":\"throttled\"}` under load. The Python SDK retries five times from 11 seconds, so allow for long waits", "A device is locked to the IP address it first connects from unless it was created with `--unlock-ip`. Check this before running from a dynamic address", "Leave `--auto-approve` off on the MCP server. It removes confirmation for deletes and for unmasking values" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "B", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 69.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 63, "maintenance": 92, "payments": 20, "reliability": 76, "schema": 71, "security": 86, "transparency": 58 }, "provenanceScore": 98 }, "connect": { "install": "pip3 install keeper-secrets-manager-cli # or: pip3 install keeper-secrets-manager-core, npm install @keeper-security/secrets-manager-core", "http": "ksm profile init XX:XXXX # one-time access token from the vault\nksm secret list # values decrypt on the client, so plain curl can't read them", "claudeCode": "/plugin marketplace add Keeper-Security/keeper-agent-kit\n/plugin install keeper-secrets@keeper-security", "config": { "mcpServers": { "ksm": { "args": [ "run", "-i", "--rm", "-e", "KSM_CONFIG_BASE64=YOUR_BASE64_CONFIG_STRING_HERE", "keeper/keeper-mcp-server:latest" ], "command": "docker" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/secrets.store", "tool": "https://letme.dev/keeper-secrets-manager" }, "area": "agent-runtime", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Keeper Security, Inc.", "domain": "keepersecurity.com", "domainRegistered": "2007-04-12", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.keepersecurity.com/legal/terms-of-use/#saas-terms", "privacy": "https://www.keepersecurity.com/legal/terms-of-use/?s=privacy", "statusPage": "https://statuspage.keeper.io", "changelog": "https://docs.keeper.io/release-notes/enterprise/keeper-secrets-manager/2026", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "Keeper publishes its website terms, SaaS Terms of Use, partner terms, privacy policy and Service Level Objectives as sections of one page at www.keepersecurity.com/legal/terms-of-use/. The SaaS section governs the service and the `?s=privacy` view is the privacy policy. The old `/termsofuse.html` and `/privacypolicy.html` addresses redirect there.", "The SaaS terms name Keeper Security, Inc., 311 W. Monroe Street, Suite 406, Chicago, IL 60606, with Keeper Security EMEA Limited and Keeper Security APAC KK for other regions. The page links legacy terms for the period before 9 March 2026.", "The SaaS terms forbid a customer to perform penetration or load testing on the services, and the website terms prohibit scraping or automated data collection on the website.", "www.keepersecurity.com/.well-known/security.txt answers with a Bugcrowd contact and Expires 2026-12-31T23:59:59Z.", "The SDKs call https://\u003cregion host\u003e/api/rest/sm/v1, where the host is keepersecurity.com, keepersecurity.eu, keepersecurity.com.au, keepersecurity.ca, keepersecurity.jp or govcloud.keepersecurity.us.", "The status page and the docs sit on keeper.io. statuspage.keeper.io is Atlassian Statuspage with a Keeper Secrets Manager component.", "RDAP for keepersecurity.com gives a registration date of 2007-04-12." ], "score": 98 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.json", "live": { "slug": "keeper-secrets-manager", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://statuspage.keeper.io", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T21:06:10.265244465Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-10-08T21:06:10.265244465Z" } }, "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Infisical", "b": "Keeper Security, Inc.", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "https://app.infisical.com/api", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio", "b": "HTTP, stdio", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth or key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Freemium", "b": "Paid", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "MIT (core), proprietary under ee/", "b": "Proprietary service under Keeper's SaaS Terms of Use. The SDKs, CLI, MCP server and agent kit on GitHub are MIT", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "10", "b": "19", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-09-23", "b": "2026-10-06", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "no date given", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2025-09-15", "b": "no date given", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "yes", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "28k stars, 305k npm/wk, 391k PyPI/wk", "b": "117 stars, 52k npm/wk, 45k PyPI/wk", "name": "Popularity" }, { "a": "3.8/5 (8)", "b": "none", "name": "Agent reviews" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Infisical scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Infisical or Keeper Secrets Manager?" }, { "answer": "Infisical takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Keeper Secrets Manager needs an API key.", "question": "Do Infisical and Keeper Secrets Manager need an API key?" }, { "answer": "Infisical has a hosted endpoint at https://app.infisical.com/api. Keeper Secrets Manager runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.", "question": "Can an agent call Infisical and Keeper Secrets Manager without installing anything?" }, { "answer": "Infisical is open source (MIT (core), proprietary under ee/). No open-source release is listed for Keeper Secrets Manager.", "question": "Are Infisical and Keeper Secrets Manager open source?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 100 against 76", "Schema \u0026 documentation, 87 against 71", "Agent ergonomics, 91 against 63", "Security \u0026 auth, 91 against 86", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 30 against 20", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 83 against 78" ], "also": [ "Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better", "A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install", "Open source" ], "goodFor": "Teams that want an open-source secrets manager they can self-host, and for coding agents run under Agent Vault so they call APIs without ever holding a token.", "slug": "infisical", "watchFor": "Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month" }, { "aheadOn": null, "also": null, "goodFor": "Companies already on Keeper's business vault that want per-device machine identities with client-side decryption and an official MCP server.", "slug": "keeper-secrets-manager", "watchFor": "Secrets Manager is priced by quote. The add-ons page shows Custom Pricing and Request a Quote" } ], "job": { "capability": "secrets.store", "name": "Secrets store" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-infisical.json", "title": "1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Infisical", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-infisical" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-infisical.json", "title": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Infisical", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-infisical" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-infisical.json", "title": "AWS Secrets Manager vs Infisical", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-infisical" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "AWS Secrets Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-infisical.json", "title": "Azure Key Vault vs Infisical", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-infisical" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Azure Key Vault vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-infisical.json", "title": "Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Infisical", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-infisical" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-infisical.json", "title": "Doppler vs Infisical", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-infisical" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Doppler vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-infisical.json", "title": "Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Infisical", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-infisical" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-infisical.json", "title": "HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Infisical", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-infisical" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "title": "HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-phase.json", "title": "Infisical vs Phase", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-phase" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "Infisical vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-pulumi-esc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-phase.json", "title": "Keeper Secrets Manager vs Phase", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-phase" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.json", "title": "Keeper Secrets Manager vs Pulumi ESC", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc" } ], "scores": [ { "by": 24, "edge": "infisical", "infisical": 100, "keeper-secrets-manager": 76, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 16, "edge": "infisical", "infisical": 87, "keeper-secrets-manager": 71, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "by": 28, "edge": "infisical", "infisical": 91, "keeper-secrets-manager": 63, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "by": 5, "edge": "infisical", "infisical": 91, "keeper-secrets-manager": 86, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "by": 10, "edge": "infisical", "infisical": 30, "keeper-secrets-manager": 20, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 2, "edge": "keeper-secrets-manager", "infisical": 90, "keeper-secrets-manager": 92, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "by": 5, "edge": "infisical", "infisical": 83, "keeper-secrets-manager": 78, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Infisical scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do secrets store.", "verdicts": { "infisical": "Agent Vault and Agent Proxy attach credentials at the proxy, so the agent's context never contains them. Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month.", "keeper-secrets-manager": "Each client device signs requests with its own key, is locked to an IP address by default and can be revoked alone, and secrets decrypt only on the client. The add-on has no public price, no request limits were found in the reviewed documentation, and a person must create the application and device in the vault." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.min.md" }, "markdown": "Infisical scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do secrets store.\n\n- Infisical: grade A, 83.7/100, rank #2 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/infisical.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/infisical.json\n- Keeper Secrets Manager: grade B, 69.4/100, rank #159 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.json\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Infisical (A)\n\nGood for: Teams that want an open-source secrets manager they can self-host, and for coding agents run under Agent Vault so they call APIs without ever holding a token.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 100 against 76\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 87 against 71\n- Agent ergonomics, 91 against 63\n- Security \u0026 auth, 91 against 86\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 30 against 20\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 83 against 78\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better\n- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install\n- Open source\n\nWatch for: Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month\n\n### Keeper Secrets Manager (B)\n\nGood for: Companies already on Keeper's business vault that want per-device machine identities with client-side decryption and an official MCP server.\n\nWatch for: Secrets Manager is priced by quote. The add-ons page shows Custom Pricing and Request a Quote\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Infisical | Keeper Secrets Manager | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 100 | 76 | Infisical +24 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 87 | 71 | Infisical +16 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 91 | 63 | Infisical +28 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 91 | 86 | Infisical +5 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 20 | Infisical +10 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 90 | 92 | Keeper Secrets Manager +2 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 83 | 78 | Infisical +5 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **83.7 · A** | **69.4 · B** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Infisical | Keeper Secrets Manager |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Infisical | Keeper Security, Inc. |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://app.infisical.com/api` | no (local only) |\n| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, stdio |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |\n| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | MIT (core), proprietary under ee/ | Proprietary service under Keeper's SaaS Terms of Use. The SDKs, CLI, MCP server and agent kit on GitHub are MIT |\n| Tools exposed | 10 | 19 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-06 |\n| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no date given |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-09-15 | no date given |\n| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |\n| Popularity | 28k stars, 305k npm/wk, 391k PyPI/wk | 117 stars, 52k npm/wk, 45k PyPI/wk |\n| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (8) | none |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Infisical.** Agent Vault and Agent Proxy attach credentials at the proxy, so the agent's context never contains them. Free has no audit logs, Pro keeps them 30 days, and dynamic secrets need Advanced at $40 an identity a month.\n\n**Keeper Secrets Manager.** Each client device signs requests with its own key, is locked to an IP address by default and can be revoked alone, and secrets decrypt only on the client. The add-on has no public price, no request limits were found in the reviewed documentation, and a person must create the application and device in the vault.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Infisical\n\n1. Run a coding agent under `infisical agent-vault run` with a bundle that allows only the hosts, methods and paths it needs, and set --ttl to the job length\n2. Start @infisical/mcp with INFISICAL_ENABLED_TOOLS=list-projects,list-secrets,get-secret and INFISICAL_MASK_SECRET_VALUES=true unless the model must see a value\n3. Log in once with Universal Auth and keep the access token for its TTL, since identity logins count against the per-IP write limit\n4. Pass viewSecretValue=false to GET /api/v4/secrets when you only need names, and expandSecretReferences=true when values reference other secrets\n5. On a 429 read the seconds from the message field and wait that long; don't retry a POST after a 5xx without checking it didn't land\n\n### Keeper Secrets Manager\n\n1. Ask the vault owner for a new device on an application that holds only the folders the task needs. Use the Base64 configuration, not the first one-time token\n2. Run commands under `ksm exec` so secrets arrive as environment variables and stay out of the model's context\n3. Expect HTTP 403 with `{\"error\":\"throttled\"}` under load. The Python SDK retries five times from 11 seconds, so allow for long waits\n4. A device is locked to the IP address it first connects from unless it was created with `--unlock-ip`. Check this before running from a dynamic address\n5. Leave `--auto-approve` off on the MCP server. It removes confirmation for deletes and for unmasking values\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Infisical or Keeper Secrets Manager?\n\nInfisical scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.\n\n### Do Infisical and Keeper Secrets Manager need an API key?\n\nInfisical takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Keeper Secrets Manager needs an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Infisical and Keeper Secrets Manager without installing anything?\n\nInfisical has a hosted endpoint at https://app.infisical.com/api. Keeper Secrets Manager runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.\n\n### Are Infisical and Keeper Secrets Manager open source?\n\nInfisical is open source (MIT (core), proprietary under ee/). No open-source release is listed for Keeper Secrets Manager.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"infisical\", \"b\": \"keeper-secrets-manager\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare infisical keeper-secrets-manager`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/infisical.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/keeper-secrets-manager.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Infisical or Keeper Secrets Manager\n\n- [1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Infisical](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-infisical.md)\n- [1Password service accounts, SDKs and Environments MCP vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/1password-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Infisical](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-infisical.md)\n- [Akeyless (SecretlessAI and MCP server) vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/akeyless-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [AWS Secrets Manager vs Infisical](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-infisical.md)\n- [AWS Secrets Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aws-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Azure Key Vault vs Infisical](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-infisical.md)\n- [Azure Key Vault vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-key-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Infisical](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-infisical.md)\n- [Bitwarden Secrets Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitwarden-secrets-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Doppler vs Infisical](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-infisical.md)\n- [Doppler vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/doppler-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Infisical](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-infisical.md)\n- [Google Cloud Secret Manager vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-secret-manager-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Infisical](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-infisical.md)\n- [HashiCorp Vault + Vault MCP Server vs Keeper Secrets Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hashicorp-vault-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.md)\n- [Infisical vs Phase](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-phase.md)\n- [Infisical vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n- [Keeper Secrets Manager vs Phase](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-phase.md)\n- [Keeper Secrets Manager vs Pulumi ESC](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/keeper-secrets-manager-vs-pulumi-esc.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-08", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.4", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Infisical vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "url": "" } ], "description": "Infisical scores 83.7 (A) on agent readiness against Keeper Secrets Manager's 69.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do secrets store. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Infisical A 83.7", "Keeper Secrets Manager B 69.4", "scores" ], "h1": "Infisical vs Keeper Secrets Manager", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager.png", "path": "/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Infisical vs Keeper Secrets Manager for AI agents, A 83.7 vs B 69.4", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-08", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/infisical-vs-keeper-secrets-manager" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 2600, "slim": 780 }, "version": 1 }