# HyperQwen vs screenpipe (slim)

> screenpipe scores 61 (C) to HyperQwen's 56.9 (C) for local inference. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperqwen-vs-screenpipe.md (~3,000 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperqwen-vs-screenpipe.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperqwen-vs-screenpipe
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-30
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

screenpipe scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against HyperQwen's 56.9 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. HyperQwen leads on payments & pricing. Both do local inference.

- HyperQwen: C 56.9, rank #738 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperqwen.min.md
- screenpipe: C 61, rank #571 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/screenpipe.min.md
- HyperQwen, good for An operator with one 24 GB NVIDIA card who wants Qwen3.8-27B behind an OpenAI-compatible endpoint for a coding or tool-calling agent, with long context. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 60 against 30. Also No key needed to call it; Free to start without a card; Open source; No incidents deducted, where screenpipe loses 3 points for them.
- screenpipe, good for One person who wants an agent to recall what they saw, said or heard on their own computer, meetings included, with local storage and local transcription. Ahead on Reliability, 65 against 59; Schema & documentation, 81 against 56; Agent ergonomics, 75 against 65; Security & auth, 48 against 41; Maintenance & community, 82 against 68; Transparency & trust, 72 against 55. Also Runs on your own machine.

| Category | HyperQwen | screenpipe |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 59 | 65 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 56 | 81 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 65 | 75 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 41 | 48 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 68 | 82 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 55 | 72 |

| Fact (where they differ) | HyperQwen | screenpipe |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | Platform |
| Vendor | syv.ai (syv-ai on GitHub) | Negentropy Labs, Inc. (dba Screenpipe) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Screenpipe Commercial License (source-available). Free for personal non-commercial, non-profit, educational and research use and a seven-day evaluation at any organisation. Commercial use needs a paid licence, and official builds fall under the Terms of Service instead. Versions released earlier under MIT stay MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 33 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.screenpipe/screenpipe-mcp` |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-01 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-09-02 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-09-24 |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | yes |
| Popularity | 2.4k stars | 22k stars, 10k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (2) |