# HyperQwen vs Open WebUI (slim)

> HyperQwen scores 56.9 (C) to Open WebUI's 52 (D) for local inference. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperqwen-vs-open-webui.md (~2,900 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperqwen-vs-open-webui.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperqwen-vs-open-webui
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-30
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

HyperQwen scores 56.9 (C) on agent readiness against Open WebUI's 52 (D), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Open WebUI leads on reliability, security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do local inference.

- HyperQwen: C 56.9, rank #738 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperqwen.min.md
- Open WebUI: D 52, rank #896 of 1239 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/open-webui.min.md
- HyperQwen, good for An operator with one 24 GB NVIDIA card who wants Qwen3.8-27B behind an OpenAI-compatible endpoint for a coding or tool-calling agent, with long context. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 65 against 54; Payments & pricing, 60 against 20. Also No key needed to call it; Free to start without a card; Open source; No incidents deducted, where Open WebUI loses 8 points for them.
- Open WebUI, good for A household or team that wants one chat interface over local and hosted models, with shared knowledge bases, memories, tools and access control, on their own server. Ahead on Reliability, 68 against 59; Security & auth, 63 against 41; Maintenance & community, 91 against 68; Transparency & trust, 73 against 55.

| Category | HyperQwen | Open WebUI |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 59 | 68 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 56 | 60 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 65 | 54 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 41 | 63 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 68 | 91 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 55 | 73 |

| Fact (where they differ) | HyperQwen | Open WebUI |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | Platform |
| Vendor | syv.ai (syv-ai on GitHub) | Open WebUI Inc. |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Open WebUI License. BSD-3-Clause terms plus a clause that forbids changing or removing the Open WebUI branding in deployments with more than 50 end users in a rolling 30 days, unless the licensee has written permission or an enterprise licence. Code from before set commits stays under MIT or BSD-3-Clause (LICENSE_HISTORY), and contributors sign a CLA |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-21 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-07-07 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2025-12-31 |
| Customer content may train models |  | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | yes |
| Popularity | 2.4k stars | 153k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |