{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "hyperliquid", "name": "Hyperliquid", "vendor": "Hyperliquid Labs", "vendorUrl": "https://hyperliquid.xyz", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Hyperliquid is a perpetuals and spot exchange whose order book runs on its own chain. Agents trade through the REST info and exchange endpoints and WebSocket at api.hyperliquid.xyz, signing with a wallet key or an approved API wallet.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json", "dns": "hyperliquid.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/hyperliquid-python-sdk", "license": "The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "hyperliquid-python-sdk" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "No API keys. Every exchange action is a signed message from an EVM wallet; info requests need no signature. A master account approves API wallets (agent wallets) with `approveAgent`, optionally named and with an expiry, which can only sign on its behalf and cannot query data. L1 actions (orders, cancels, margin settings) and user-signed actions (USDC and spot sends, withdrawals, approvals) use two different EIP-712 schemes, and the docs recommend an SDK for signing. Nonces are per signer, must sit within two days behind and one day ahead of block time, and sub-accounts signed by one API wallet share its nonce set (https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api/nonces-and-api-wallets.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API has no charge. Base-tier fees are 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker on perpetuals and 0.070% taker and 0.040% maker on spot, assessed on rolling 14-day volume, falling to 0.024% taker and 0% maker above $7 billion, with maker rebates to -0.003% for large maker share and staking discounts of 5% to 40%. Withdrawals to the bridge cost $1; an activation gas fee applies to a first order. `reserveRequestWeight` buys extra rate limit at 0.0005 USDC a request (https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/trading/fees.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.04% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs (checked 2026-11-03). Accounts are funded by depositing USDC on Arbitrum or other bridged chains; several third-party MCP servers in the registry sell Hyperliquid data by x402, none of them Hyperliquid's.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 0, "popularity": { "githubStars": 1873, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": 167497, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api", "llmsTxt": "https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.market-data", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto", "wallet.onchain" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "closed-source", "llms-txt", "python", "rust", "sandbox", "usage-priced", "no-key", "no-status-page", "bug-bounty", "rest" ], "lastRelease": "2026-06-04", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1018, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 19, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 39, "payments": 55, "reliability": 40, "schema": 42, "security": 64, "transparency": 26 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.", "bestFor": "An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.", "strengths": [ "API wallets approved by the master account can only sign trading actions; withdrawals and external transfers need the user's own key", "Numeric rate limits per IP and per address, with weights per request type and a paid `reserveRequestWeight` top-up", "Fees published per tier from 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker on perpetuals, with maker rebates and staking discounts", "A testnet at api.hyperliquid-testnet.xyz with the same API and a faucet of 1,000 mock USDC for addresses that have deposited on mainnet", "Client order IDs (`cloid`), `expiresAfter`, `noop` and a `scheduleCancel` dead man's switch for safe retries" ], "weaknesses": [ "No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402", "No OpenAPI file, no changelog, no API versioning and no status page found", "The terms of use and privacy policy at app.hyperliquid.xyz draw by script and hyperliquid.xyz/terms answered 403, so the restricted jurisdictions are unchecked", "Order errors are message strings without codes, and the docs give no 429 or Retry-After guidance beyond one request every 10 seconds when limited", "The official Python SDK is marked Alpha, last released 4 June 2026, with 112 open issues" ], "agentNotes": [ "Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with `approveAgent` with a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address", "Use the Python SDK's `sign_l1_action` and `sign_user_signed_action`; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives \"User or API Wallet ... does not exist\"", "Set a `cloid` on every order and read the per-order `statuses` array; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch", "Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data", "Arm `scheduleCancel` before unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 39, "payments": 55, "reliability": 40, "schema": 42, "security": 64, "transparency": 20 }, "provenanceScore": 32, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "pip install hyperliquid-python-sdk", "http": "curl -X POST https://api.hyperliquid.xyz/info -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{\"type\":\"l2Book\",\"coin\":\"BTC\"}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.derivatives", "tool": "https://letme.dev/hyperliquid" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Perpetuals taker fee, tier 0", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.045, "note": "0.045% of notional; maker 0.015%" }, { "item": "Spot taker fee, tier 0", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.07, "note": "0.070% of notional; maker 0.040%" }, { "item": "Bridge withdrawal", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1, "note": "$1 per withdrawal to the bridge contract" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "hyperliquid.xyz", "domainRegistered": "2022-10-15", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/terms", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "No legal entity found on a readable page. The docs name Hyperliquid Labs (self-funded) and the Hyper Foundation (bug bounty); app.hyperliquid.xyz/terms and hyperfoundation.org draw by script and hyperliquid.xyz/terms answered 403.", "RDAP gives hyperliquid.xyz a registration date of 15 October 2022, registrar Squarespace Domains.", "No status page found; status.hyperliquid.xyz did not resolve and the docs link none. No changelog; the docs have no dated release notes.", "https://hyperliquid.xyz/.well-known/security.txt answered 403, so security.txt is unknown. The docs' bug bounty page gives bugbounty@hyperfoundation.org.", "hyperliquid.gitbook.io/robots.txt allows everything with Content-Signal ai-input=yes; hyperliquid.xyz/robots.txt allows everything." ], "score": 32 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.json", "live": { "slug": "hyperliquid", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://hyperliquid.xyz/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "unknown", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:05.956872316Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:05.956872316Z" } }, "answer": "OKX API scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on payments \u0026 pricing.", "b": { "slug": "okx", "name": "OKX API", "vendor": "OKX", "vendorUrl": "https://www.okx.com/docs-v5/en/", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "OKX's V5 API covers spot, margin, perpetual, futures and options trading, account and market data over REST and WebSocket, with demo trading on the same host and an open-source Agent Trade Kit whose okx-trade-mcp package is a local MCP server.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/okx", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/okx.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/okx.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/okx.json", "dns": "okx.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/okx/agent-trade-kit", "license": "Proprietary hosted service under OKX's Terms of Service (29 October 2026) and API Agreement (28 July 2026). The Agent Trade Kit (MCP server, CLI and skills) is MIT", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@okx_ai/okx-trade-mcp" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@okx_ai/okx-trade-cli" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "python-okx" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API key, secret and passphrase made at okx.com/account/my-api, with HMAC-SHA256 signatures over a timestamp and the request. Permissions are Read, Trade and Withdraw, singly or combined; each key binds up to 20 IP addresses or ranges, and a Trade or Withdraw key with no IP binding expires after 14 days without use. Demo trading uses the same host with the header `x-simulated-trading` set to 1 and keys that do not expire. US and Australian users call us.okx.com and EEA users eea.okx.com. The MCP server reads the key from ~/.okx/config.toml, checks its permissions at startup and hides order tools when the key cannot trade (https://www.okx.com/docs-v5/en/, https://www.okx.com/docs-v5/agent_en/, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API costs nothing to call. Trades carry maker and taker fees by regular and VIP level; the fee page at okx.com/fees loads its table by script and the fee FAQ says the rates that apply are the ones shown while logged in, so the lowest tier's rates are unread. Public market data and demo trading need no funded account.", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the V5 docs, the API agreement or the Agent Trade Kit (checked 2026-11-03).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 170, "popularity": { "githubStars": 499, "npmWeekly": 1839, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.okx.com/docs-v5/en/", "llmsTxt": "https://www.okx.com/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.market-data", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "official", "closed-source", "api-key", "mcp", "cli", "llms-txt", "sandbox", "typescript", "python", "usage-priced", "no-card", "mit" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-28", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 64.3, "grade": "B", "agentReady": false, "rank": 413, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 4, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 77, "maintenance": 81, "payments": 20, "reliability": 65, "schema": 73, "security": 68, "transparency": 62 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "OKX publishes per-endpoint rate limits, Read, Trade and Withdraw key permissions with IP binding, demo trading on the production host, and an MIT MCP server with 170 tools, a read-only flag and a permission check at startup. The fee table and privacy policy were not read, no OpenAPI file was found, and the news tools return third-party text.", "bestFor": "An agent trading spot, perpetuals, futures or options on a person's OKX account from a local machine, with demo trading to test first and grid or DCA bots through the kit.", "strengths": [ "Official local MCP server, MIT, with modules, --read-only, a demo profile, readOnlyHint annotations and a startup check that hides order tools when the key cannot trade", "Keys limited to Read, Trade or Withdraw, bound to up to 20 IPs, with unbound Trade and Withdraw keys expiring after 14 idle days", "Rate limits published per endpoint and per User ID, with sub-account and WebSocket limits in numbers", "Demo trading on the production hosts with one header, keys that do not expire, and a demo profile in the kit", "An API Agreement written for agents, naming prohibited tactics, minimum key scope and rate-limit circumvention" ], "weaknesses": [ "The fee table loads by script and the fee FAQ defers to the logged-in view, so maker and taker rates were not read", "No OpenAPI file was found in the docs; the machine-readable contract is the kit's tool definitions", "The status page lists incidents without component history, and its newest entry is from March 2024", "The news and smart money tools return third-party text with no documented guidance on treating it as untrusted", "Trade tools in the kit carry destructiveHint false, and the npm package runs a postinstall script" ], "agentNotes": [ "Start okx-trade-mcp with --profile demo first, then --read-only on a live key; load only the modules the task needs", "Use a sub-account key with Read and Trade only, bound to the agent's IP; an unbound Trade key expires after 14 idle days", "Stay under 60 place-order requests per 2 seconds per instrument and at most 3 amendments in flight per order; 50011 means the limit was hit", "Send a clOrdId on every order and use the structured error block (code, message, endpoint) to diagnose with read-only tools before retrying", "Call us.okx.com or eea.okx.com for US, Australian and EEA accounts; openapi.okx.com does not serve those regions" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "B", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 64.3 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 77, "maintenance": 81, "payments": 20, "reliability": 65, "schema": 73, "security": 68, "transparency": 38 }, "provenanceScore": 85, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npm install -g @okx_ai/okx-trade-mcp @okx_ai/okx-trade-cli", "http": "curl https://www.okx.com/api/v5/market/ticker?instId=BTC-USDT", "config": { "mcpServers": { "okx-demo": { "args": [ "-y", "@okx_ai/okx-trade-mcp", "--profile", "demo" ], "command": "npx" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.spot-trading", "tool": "https://letme.dev/okx" }, "area": "payments", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Aux Cayes FinTech Co. Ltd.", "domain": "okx.com", "domainRegistered": "2001-07-03", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.okx.com/help/terms-of-service", "privacy": "https://www.okx.com/help/privacy-policy", "statusPage": "https://www.okx.com/status", "changelog": "https://www.okx.com/docs-v5/log_en/", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "The Terms of Service (last updated 29 October 2026) name Aux Cayes FinTech Co. Ltd. for all users not served by a regional OKX entity; the page metadata of the API Agreement also lists it as publisher. The governing-law clause sat past the part of the page we read. The privacy policy URL is OKX's help-centre page and was not read.", "RDAP gives okx.com a registration date of 3 July 2001, long before OKX took the name in 2022.", "https://www.okx.com/.well-known/security.txt answers 404; the Agent Trade Kit's SECURITY.md names security@okx.com.", "www.okx.com/robots.txt allows the docs, help and status pages read and /llms.txt, and disallows account, KYC and other private paths.", "okx.com/status is OKX's own page with issue descriptions and maintenance notices in UTC+8, no component history and no feed found." ], "score": 85 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/okx.json", "live": { "slug": "okx", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://www.okx.com/status", "indicator": "unknown", "summary": "no machine-readable status found", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:32:13.2375881Z" }, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://okx.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:49.77403161Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:49.77403161Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 42, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "okx", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39.", "b": "Read as a closed service with an open-source kit. Changelog entry of 27 October 2026 and kit v1.5.0 on 28 October (30). Changelog entries on 3, 6, 11, 18, 20 and 26 August, 15, 29 and 30 September and 27 October, and kit releases on 20 and 21 August, 1, 7, 14 and 23 September, 19 and 28 October (20). A public changelog, a Telegram community for the kit and GitHub issues whose replies were not read (10 of 15). python-okx is named as the official SDK and the kit is current; the MCP server is not in the official registry (12 of 15). The kit runs CI on push and pull request across Node 18, 20 and 26 with unit tests and coverage (9 of 10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 12 + 9 = 81." }, "scores": { "a": 39, "b": 81 } }, { "by": 36, "category": "transparency", "leads": "okx", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "The editorial half. The SDKs are MIT and the node repository Apache-2.0 with a Dockerfile around a binary; the API servers and front end are closed and the terms were unreadable (12 of 30). No privacy policy read and nothing in the docs on data handling (0 of 30). Deprecated actions are marked in the docs without dates or a policy (8 of 20). No subprocessors or data locations (0 of 20). Total 20.", "b": "The editorial half. A closed service with terms that name the contracting entities by region and an API Agreement for agents; the kit is MIT (17 of 30). The privacy policy was not read (5 of 30). The changelog dates sunsets and labels breaking changes, such as port 8443 on 31 October and 16 November 2026 (16 of 20). No subprocessor or data-location statement read; the MCP server is local and its npm package runs a postinstall script whose purpose we did not trace (0 of 20). 17 + 5 + 16 + 0 = 38." }, "scores": { "a": 26, "b": 62 } }, { "by": 35, "category": "payments", "leads": "hyperliquid", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). The fee table loads by script and the fee FAQ defers to the logged-in view, so no rate was read (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data and demo trading need no funded account or card (20). A person signs up, verifies and mints a key (0). 0 + 0 + 20 + 0 = 20." }, "scores": { "a": 55, "b": 20 } }, { "by": 31, "category": "schema", "leads": "okx", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract; request and response shapes are tables and JSON examples in the docs (0 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page by appending .md (10). Each info type and exchange action has a short description of what it does, and the signing page lists common mistakes, but little says when to use one call over another (12 of 20). Fields are one-letter keys (`a`, `b`, `p`, `s`, `r`, `t`, `c`) with numbers as strings, enums such as `tif` Alo, Ioc or Gtc, and required fields marked in tables (9 of 15). An example for every call and a list of order and cancel error strings, with no HTTP error table (11 of 15). No API version, no changelog and no dated release notes; deprecated actions such as `userDexAbstraction` are marked in place (0 of 15). Total 42.", "b": "No OpenAPI file was found in the V5 docs; the kit's tool definitions are typed TypeScript with annotations, and the organisation has an undescribed ai-builder-openapi-md repository we did not read (12 of 25). okx.com/llms.txt exists and links the API and Agent Trade Kit pages, though the V5 docs have no Markdown twins (5 of 10). Each endpoint states its rate limit, rule, parameters and notes (15 of 20). Enums for ordType, tdMode and instType with required flags (12 of 15). Request and response examples per endpoint and an error code list with messages (14 of 15). A dated changelog with an upcoming-changes section that labels breaking changes and dates sunsets (15). 12 + 5 + 15 + 12 + 14 + 15 = 73." }, "scores": { "a": 42, "b": 73 } }, { "by": 25, "category": "reliability", "leads": "okx", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Read with the hosted lines on the REST API at api.hyperliquid.xyz, the surface an agent calls; the chain behind it is noted under details. No status page found in the docs, on hyperliquid.xyz or at status.hyperliquid.xyz, which did not resolve (0). No readable history (5). Rate limits documented with numbers per IP, per address and per WebSocket connection (15). When limited, an address gets one request every 10 seconds; no 429 shape or Retry-After is documented, but `cloid`, per-signer nonces, `expiresAfter` and `noop` make retries safe (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Mainnet is generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 40.", "b": "Read with the hosted lines on the V5 REST API. okx.com/status is OKX's own page with issue descriptions, maintenance notices and deposit and withdrawal status, but no component history or feed (10 of 20). It lists no incident between 5 August and 3 November 2026; its newest entry is from March 2024, and whether every incident reaches the page cannot be told, so read as clean with a doubt (20 of 30). Rate limits per endpoint, per User ID and per sub-account with numbers, and WebSocket limits (15). Error 50011 on a limit, a clOrdId on orders and a cap of 3 amendments in flight, but no Retry-After or backoff guidance found (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Generally available (10). 10 + 20 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 65." }, "scores": { "a": 40, "b": 65 } }, { "by": 7, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "okx", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "An API, read for response sizing. Time-range calls return at most 500 blocks of data, fills and historical orders cap at 2,000 items, candles at 5,000, l2Book at 20 levels a side (18 of 25). Cursor-by-timestamp pagination on fills and funding, filtering by coin or dex, no field selection (14 of 20). Order errors are documented strings per order, one batch-level error rejects a batch, and `orderStatus` answers `unknownOid`; no codes and no rate-limit error shape (12 of 20). `cloid`, per-signer nonces within a time window, `expiresAfter`, `noop` to burn a nonce and `scheduleCancel` as a dead man's switch (18 of 20). Few required fields, but signing needs msgpack field order, two EIP-712 schemes and lowercase addresses, and the official SDKs are Python (Alpha) and Rust only (8 of 15). Total 70.", "b": "limit parameters on books, candles and history, and in the kit --modules and --read-only narrow 170 tools to the three default modules; no field selection (17 of 25). after, before and limit cursors on history endpoints (18 of 20). Numeric codes with messages, such as 51020 for an invalid quantity, and the kit returns a structured error block with code, message and endpoint (17 of 20). clOrdId on orders, batch endpoints and a cap of 3 amendments in flight; the kit sets readOnlyHint on query tools but destructiveHint false on order tools and has no idempotency key (13 of 20). python-okx, the CLI and a demo profile, with passphrase and HMAC signing on every private call (12 of 15). 17 + 18 + 17 + 13 + 12 = 77." }, "scores": { "a": 70, "b": 77 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Hyperliquid Labs", "b": "OKX", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "", "b": "stdio", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth or key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed", "b": "Proprietary hosted service under OKX's Terms of Service (29 October 2026) and API Agreement (28 July 2026). The Agent Trade Kit (MCP server, CLI and skills) is MIT", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "0", "b": "170", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-06-04", "b": "2026-10-28", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "2026-10-29", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "yes", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk", "b": "499 stars, 1.8k npm/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "OKX API scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on payments \u0026 pricing.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Hyperliquid or OKX API?" }, { "answer": "Hyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. OKX API needs an API key.", "question": "Do Hyperliquid and OKX API need an API key?" }, { "answer": "No hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid. OKX API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.", "question": "Can an agent call Hyperliquid and OKX API without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 20" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.", "slug": "hyperliquid", "watchFor": "No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 65 against 40", "Schema \u0026 documentation, 73 against 42", "Agent ergonomics, 77 against 70", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 81 against 39", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 62 against 26" ], "also": [ "Runs on your own machine", "Free to start without a card" ], "goodFor": "An agent trading spot, perpetuals, futures or options on a person's OKX account from a local machine, with demo trading to test first and grid or DCA bots through the kit.", "slug": "okx", "watchFor": "The fee table loads by script and the fee FAQ defers to the logged-in view, so maker and taker rates were not read" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.derivatives", "name": "Exchange derivatives" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitget vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bitget vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bybit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bybit vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-okx.json", "title": "Crypto.com Exchange API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Gate vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-okx.json", "title": "Gate vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-okx.json", "title": "Gemini Exchange API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-okx.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-okx.json", "title": "KuCoin vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-okx.json", "title": "MEXC API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Binance API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-okx.json", "title": "Binance API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-okx.json", "title": "Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-okx.json", "title": "Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-okx.json", "title": "Kraken API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/okx-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "OKX API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/okx-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/okx-vs-upbit.json", "title": "OKX API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/okx-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Deribit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-okx.json", "title": "Deribit vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "dYdX vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-okx.json", "title": "dYdX vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "by": 25, "edge": "okx", "hyperliquid": 40, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "okx": 65, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 31, "edge": "okx", "hyperliquid": 42, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "okx": 73, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 7, "edge": "okx", "hyperliquid": 70, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "okx": 77, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 4, "edge": "okx", "hyperliquid": 64, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "okx": 68, "weight": 14 }, { "by": 35, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 55, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "okx": 20, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 42, "edge": "okx", "hyperliquid": 39, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "okx": 81, "weight": 7 }, { "by": 36, "edge": "okx", "hyperliquid": 26, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "okx": 62, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "OKX API scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on payments \u0026 pricing. Both do exchange derivatives.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "hyperliquid": "Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.", "okx": "OKX publishes per-endpoint rate limits, Read, Trade and Withdraw key permissions with IP binding, demo trading on the production host, and an MIT MCP server with 170 tools, a read-only flag and a permission check at startup. The fee table and privacy policy were not read, no OpenAPI file was found, and the news tools return third-party text." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.min.md" }, "markdown": "OKX API scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on payments \u0026 pricing. Both do exchange derivatives.\n\n- Hyperliquid: grade D, 50/100, rank #1018 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json\n- OKX API: grade B, 64.3/100, rank #413 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/okx.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/okx.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Hyperliquid (D)\n\nGood for: An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.\n\nAhead on:\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 20\n\nWatch for: No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402\n\n### OKX API (B)\n\nGood for: An agent trading spot, perpetuals, futures or options on a person's OKX account from a local machine, with demo trading to test first and grid or DCA bots through the kit.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 65 against 40\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 73 against 42\n- Agent ergonomics, 77 against 70\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 81 against 39\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 62 against 26\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Runs on your own machine\n- Free to start without a card\n\nWatch for: The fee table loads by script and the fee FAQ defers to the logged-in view, so maker and taker rates were not read\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: OKX API +42\n\n- Hyperliquid (39): Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39.\n- OKX API (81): Read as a closed service with an open-source kit. Changelog entry of 27 October 2026 and kit v1.5.0 on 28 October (30). Changelog entries on 3, 6, 11, 18, 20 and 26 August, 15, 29 and 30 September and 27 October, and kit releases on 20 and 21 August, 1, 7, 14 and 23 September, 19 and 28 October (20). A public changelog, a Telegram community for the kit and GitHub issues whose replies were not read (10 of 15). python-okx is named as the official SDK and the kit is current; the MCP server is not in the official registry (12 of 15). The kit runs CI on push and pull request across Node 18, 20 and 26 with unit tests and coverage (9 of 10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 12 + 9 = 81.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: OKX API +36\n\n- Hyperliquid (26): The editorial half. The SDKs are MIT and the node repository Apache-2.0 with a Dockerfile around a binary; the API servers and front end are closed and the terms were unreadable (12 of 30). No privacy policy read and nothing in the docs on data handling (0 of 30). Deprecated actions are marked in the docs without dates or a policy (8 of 20). No subprocessors or data locations (0 of 20). Total 20.\n- OKX API (62): The editorial half. A closed service with terms that name the contracting entities by region and an API Agreement for agents; the kit is MIT (17 of 30). The privacy policy was not read (5 of 30). The changelog dates sunsets and labels breaking changes, such as port 8443 on 31 October and 16 November 2026 (16 of 20). No subprocessor or data-location statement read; the MCP server is local and its npm package runs a postinstall script whose purpose we did not trace (0 of 20). 17 + 5 + 16 + 0 = 38.\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Hyperliquid +35\n\n- Hyperliquid (55): No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55.\n- OKX API (20): No machine payment protocol (0). The fee table loads by script and the fee FAQ defers to the logged-in view, so no rate was read (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data and demo trading need no funded account or card (20). A person signs up, verifies and mints a key (0). 0 + 0 + 20 + 0 = 20.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: OKX API +31\n\n- Hyperliquid (42): No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract; request and response shapes are tables and JSON examples in the docs (0 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page by appending .md (10). Each info type and exchange action has a short description of what it does, and the signing page lists common mistakes, but little says when to use one call over another (12 of 20). Fields are one-letter keys (`a`, `b`, `p`, `s`, `r`, `t`, `c`) with numbers as strings, enums such as `tif` Alo, Ioc or Gtc, and required fields marked in tables (9 of 15). An example for every call and a list of order and cancel error strings, with no HTTP error table (11 of 15). No API version, no changelog and no dated release notes; deprecated actions such as `userDexAbstraction` are marked in place (0 of 15). Total 42.\n- OKX API (73): No OpenAPI file was found in the V5 docs; the kit's tool definitions are typed TypeScript with annotations, and the organisation has an undescribed ai-builder-openapi-md repository we did not read (12 of 25). okx.com/llms.txt exists and links the API and Agent Trade Kit pages, though the V5 docs have no Markdown twins (5 of 10). Each endpoint states its rate limit, rule, parameters and notes (15 of 20). Enums for ordType, tdMode and instType with required flags (12 of 15). Request and response examples per endpoint and an error code list with messages (14 of 15). A dated changelog with an upcoming-changes section that labels breaking changes and dates sunsets (15). 12 + 5 + 15 + 12 + 14 + 15 = 73.\n\n### Reliability: OKX API +25\n\n- Hyperliquid (40): Read with the hosted lines on the REST API at api.hyperliquid.xyz, the surface an agent calls; the chain behind it is noted under details. No status page found in the docs, on hyperliquid.xyz or at status.hyperliquid.xyz, which did not resolve (0). No readable history (5). Rate limits documented with numbers per IP, per address and per WebSocket connection (15). When limited, an address gets one request every 10 seconds; no 429 shape or Retry-After is documented, but `cloid`, per-signer nonces, `expiresAfter` and `noop` make retries safe (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Mainnet is generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 40.\n- OKX API (65): Read with the hosted lines on the V5 REST API. okx.com/status is OKX's own page with issue descriptions, maintenance notices and deposit and withdrawal status, but no component history or feed (10 of 20). It lists no incident between 5 August and 3 November 2026; its newest entry is from March 2024, and whether every incident reaches the page cannot be told, so read as clean with a doubt (20 of 30). Rate limits per endpoint, per User ID and per sub-account with numbers, and WebSocket limits (15). Error 50011 on a limit, a clOrdId on orders and a cap of 3 amendments in flight, but no Retry-After or backoff guidance found (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Generally available (10). 10 + 20 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 65.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: OKX API +7\n\n- Hyperliquid (70): An API, read for response sizing. Time-range calls return at most 500 blocks of data, fills and historical orders cap at 2,000 items, candles at 5,000, l2Book at 20 levels a side (18 of 25). Cursor-by-timestamp pagination on fills and funding, filtering by coin or dex, no field selection (14 of 20). Order errors are documented strings per order, one batch-level error rejects a batch, and `orderStatus` answers `unknownOid`; no codes and no rate-limit error shape (12 of 20). `cloid`, per-signer nonces within a time window, `expiresAfter`, `noop` to burn a nonce and `scheduleCancel` as a dead man's switch (18 of 20). Few required fields, but signing needs msgpack field order, two EIP-712 schemes and lowercase addresses, and the official SDKs are Python (Alpha) and Rust only (8 of 15). Total 70.\n- OKX API (77): limit parameters on books, candles and history, and in the kit --modules and --read-only narrow 170 tools to the three default modules; no field selection (17 of 25). after, before and limit cursors on history endpoints (18 of 20). Numeric codes with messages, such as 51020 for an invalid quantity, and the kit returns a structured error block with code, message and endpoint (17 of 20). clOrdId on orders, batch endpoints and a cap of 3 amendments in flight; the kit sets readOnlyHint on query tools but destructiveHint false on order tools and has no idempotency key (13 of 20). python-okx, the CLI and a demo profile, with passphrase and HMAC signing on every private call (12 of 15). 17 + 18 + 17 + 13 + 12 = 77.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Hyperliquid | OKX API | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 40 | 65 | OKX API +25 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 42 | 73 | OKX API +31 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 70 | 77 | OKX API +7 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 64 | 68 | OKX API +4 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 55 | 20 | Hyperliquid +35 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 39 | 81 | OKX API +42 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 26 | 62 | OKX API +36 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **50 · D** | **64.3 · B** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Hyperliquid | OKX API |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Hyperliquid Labs | OKX |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | | stdio |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed | Proprietary hosted service under OKX's Terms of Service (29 October 2026) and API Agreement (28 July 2026). The Agent Trade Kit (MCP server, CLI and skills) is MIT |\n| Tools exposed | 0 | 170 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-06-04 | 2026-10-28 |\n| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-10-29 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |\n| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | yes |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |\n| Popularity | 1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk | 499 stars, 1.8k npm/wk |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Hyperliquid.** Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.\n\n**OKX API.** OKX publishes per-endpoint rate limits, Read, Trade and Withdraw key permissions with IP binding, demo trading on the production host, and an MIT MCP server with 170 tools, a read-only flag and a permission check at startup. The fee table and privacy policy were not read, no OpenAPI file was found, and the news tools return third-party text.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Hyperliquid\n\n1. Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with `approveAgent` with a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address\n2. Use the Python SDK's `sign_l1_action` and `sign_user_signed_action`; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives \"User or API Wallet ... does not exist\"\n3. Set a `cloid` on every order and read the per-order `statuses` array; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch\n4. Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data\n5. Arm `scheduleCancel` before unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops\n\n### OKX API\n\n1. Start okx-trade-mcp with --profile demo first, then --read-only on a live key; load only the modules the task needs\n2. Use a sub-account key with Read and Trade only, bound to the agent's IP; an unbound Trade key expires after 14 idle days\n3. Stay under 60 place-order requests per 2 seconds per instrument and at most 3 amendments in flight per order; 50011 means the limit was hit\n4. Send a clOrdId on every order and use the structured error block (code, message, endpoint) to diagnose with read-only tools before retrying\n5. Call us.okx.com or eea.okx.com for US, Australian and EEA accounts; openapi.okx.com does not serve those regions\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Hyperliquid or OKX API?\n\nOKX API scores 64.3 (B) on agent readiness against Hyperliquid's 50 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Hyperliquid leads on payments \u0026 pricing.\n\n### Do Hyperliquid and OKX API need an API key?\n\nHyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. OKX API needs an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Hyperliquid and OKX API without installing anything?\n\nNo hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid. OKX API runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"hyperliquid\", \"b\": \"okx\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare hyperliquid okx`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/okx.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Hyperliquid or OKX API\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitfinex API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitget vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bybit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bybit vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-okx.md)\n- [Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Crypto.com Exchange API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-okx.md)\n- [Gate vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Gate vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-okx.md)\n- [Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Gemini Exchange API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-okx.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-okx.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.md)\n- [KuCoin vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kucoin-vs-okx.md)\n- [MEXC API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mexc-vs-okx.md)\n- [Binance API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Binance API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-okx.md)\n- [Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-okx.md)\n- [Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-okx.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Kraken API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kraken-vs-okx.md)\n- [OKX API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/okx-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [OKX API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/okx-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Deribit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Deribit vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-okx.md)\n- [dYdX vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [dYdX vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-okx.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Hyperliquid vs OKX API", "url": "" } ], "description": "OKX scores 64.3 (B) to Hyperliquid's 50 (D) for exchange derivatives. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Hyperliquid D 50", "OKX API B 64.3", "scores" ], "h1": "Hyperliquid vs OKX API", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Hyperliquid vs OKX for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-03", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4800, "slim": 2680 }, "version": 1 }