# Hyperbrowser vs TinyFish (slim)

> TinyFish and Hyperbrowser score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 67.7 (B) and 66.9 (B). Hyperbrowser leads on reliability, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do browser automation. Hyperbrowser accepts x402. TinyFish doesn't. Category scores…

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperbrowser-vs-tinyfish.md (~2,550 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperbrowser-vs-tinyfish.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperbrowser-vs-tinyfish
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

TinyFish and Hyperbrowser score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 67.7 (B) and 66.9 (B). Hyperbrowser leads on reliability, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do browser automation. Hyperbrowser accepts x402. TinyFish doesn't.

- Hyperbrowser: B 66.9, rank #250 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperbrowser.min.md
- TinyFish: B 67.7, rank #227 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tinyfish.min.md
- Hyperbrowser, good for Agents that need a cloud browser by the minute plus cheap fetch and search, especially wallet-holding agents with no account. Ahead on Reliability, 65 against 60; Payments & pricing, 94 against 55; Transparency & trust, 64 against 59. Also An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account; Runs on your own machine.
- TinyFish, good for Agents that want one account for a goal-driven web agent, a raw CDP browser, and free search and fetch. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 85 against 68; Agent ergonomics, 79 against 67; Security & auth, 57 against 44.

| Category | Hyperbrowser | TinyFish |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 65 | 60 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 68 | 85 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 67 | 79 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 44 | 57 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 94 | 55 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 79 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 64 | 59 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hyperbrowser | TinyFish |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | S2 Labs Inc. | Tiny Fish, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.hyperbrowser.ai` | `https://agent.tinyfish.ai` |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| x402 | yes | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under S2 Labs' terms of service. The Node and Python SDKs and the MCP server are MIT, and HyperAgent is AGPL-3.0 | Proprietary service under Tiny Fish's terms of service. The MCP proxy `@tiny-fish/mcp` and the cookbook are MIT. The SDK packages state no licence in npm or PyPI metadata |
| MCP registry | not listed | `ai.tinyfish.agent/web-agent` |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-08-17 |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2025-12-14 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |
| Popularity | 89k npm/wk, 73k PyPI/wk | 5.7k npm/wk, 6.5k PyPI/wk |