# Hygraph vs WordPress (slim) > Hygraph scores 69.3 (B) on agent readiness against WordPress's 64.8 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. WordPress leads on payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do cms content. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by… - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hygraph-vs-wordpress.md (~2,450 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hygraph-vs-wordpress.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hygraph-vs-wordpress - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09 Hygraph scores 69.3 (B) on agent readiness against WordPress's 64.8 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. WordPress leads on payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do cms content. - Hygraph: B 69.3, rank #182 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hygraph.min.md - WordPress: B 64.8, rank #310 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/wordpress.min.md - Hygraph, good for Teams on Hygraph who want an agent to create, localise and publish entries, upload assets or change schema, with delete and unpublish kept out of reach on MCP. Ahead on Reliability, 89 against 78; Schema & documentation, 78 against 65. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Free to start without a card; No incidents deducted, where WordPress loses 5 points for them. - WordPress, good for Sites that already run WordPress, where an agent drafts posts and uploads media under a Contributor or Author account and a person publishes. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 60 against 35; Maintenance & community, 83 against 74; Transparency & trust, 68 against 60. Also Runs on your own machine; Open source. | Category | Hygraph | WordPress | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 89 | 78 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 78 | 65 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 72 | 74 | | Security & auth (14%) | 63 | 62 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 60 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 74 | 83 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 60 | 68 | | Fact (where they differ) | Hygraph | WordPress | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Hygraph GmbH | WordPress.org (open-source project) | | Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.hygraph.com/mcp` | no (local only) | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio | | Auth | OAuth or key | API key | | Pricing | Freemium | Free | | Licence | Proprietary service under Hygraph GmbH's Terms of Service. The `@hygraph/management-sdk` package is MIT | GPL-2.0-or-later. The MCP Adapter plugin is GPL-2.0-or-later too | | Tools exposed | 17 | none | | Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-06 | | Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | | | Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | | | Terms or service can change without notice | yes | | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | | | Popularity | 52 stars, 8.6k npm/wk | 21k stars |