{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "hy4", "name": "Tencent Hy4", "vendor": "Tencent (Hy team)", "vendorUrl": "https://aistudio.tencent.com", "kind": "model", "category": "inference", "summary": "Tencent Hy4 is Tencent's flagship language model, released on 4 November 2026 with image understanding and computer use, served on Tencent Cloud TokenHub as hy4 with a 1M-token context, at ¥6 input and ¥18 output per million tokens.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy4", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy4.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy4.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hy4.json", "dns": "hy4.grade.anchorterminal.com", "license": "Hosted model under the Tencent Cloud TokenHub terms. Tencent says weights and a system card will follow; no licence is stated yet", "transports": [ "http" ], "packages": [], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "A TokenHub bearer key (or `x-api-key` on the Anthropic-style route) from a Tencent Cloud account with real-name verification, per the tencent-tokenhub listing. Keys can be limited by model, service, IP range and token quota.", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "¥6 input, ¥0.3 cached input and ¥18 output per million tokens on TokenHub, billed at 50% until 31 December 2026 (Beijing time), per the price page updated 9 November 2026. Tencent's release gives about US$0.90, US$0.045 and US$2.70. No free allowance named for hy4 on the price page.", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in Tencent's release or TokenHub's price page, 11 November 2026.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-11" }, "docsUrl": "https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1823/130051", "llmsTxt": "https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1823/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "inference.llm" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "model", "multimodal", "reasoning", "long-context", "tool-calling", "usage-priced", "openai-compatible", "anthropic-compatible", "chinese", "new" ], "lastRelease": "2026-11-04", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 64, "grade": "B", "agentReady": false, "rank": 595, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1524, "categoryRank": 25, "methodology": "0.8", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 86, "maintenance": 73, "payments": 45, "reliability": 46, "schema": 73, "security": 71, "transparency": 52 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-11" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Tencent's flagship model is on TokenHub as hy4, with a 1M-token context, image understanding, function calling and caching, at ¥6 input and ¥18 output per million tokens, half price until the end of 2026. The weights it is called open source for aren't published yet, and every benchmark is Tencent's own.", "bestFor": "Long-context agent work, coding and office or finance tasks on a 1M-token context with images, for teams already on Tencent Cloud or happy to verify an account there.", "strengths": [ "1M-token context with 960K input and 64K output, per TokenHub's model list", "Image understanding, function calling, structured output, thinking and caching are marked for hy4", "Prices published: ¥6 input, ¥0.3 cached, ¥18 output per million tokens, billed at 50% until 31 December 2026", "OpenAI- and Anthropic-compatible endpoints on TokenHub, so existing SDKs work with a changed base URL", "Tencent says it's the same price as Hy4 preview despite the upgrade" ], "weaknesses": [ "Weights, licence and system card are promised but not published; tencent/Hy4 didn't answer on Hugging Face on 11 November", "Computer use, which Tencent's release names, isn't marked in TokenHub's model list", "TokenHub needs real-name verification, and the international site answers with a bot check", "No public status page for TokenHub", "Every benchmark in the release is Tencent's own or a partner's, several of them internal" ], "agentNotes": [ "Use model id hy4 on TokenHub's OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoints; hy4-preview is a separate, older model", "Keep input under 960K tokens and expect at most 64K output", "Reuse prompt prefixes: cached input is ¥0.3 against ¥6", "Check the price page for the end of the 50% discount on 31 December 2026 before budgeting", "Read rate limits from the console or DescribeModelQuota; the public docs don't give them for chat models" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "B", "methodology": "0.8", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 64 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 86, "maintenance": 73, "payments": 45, "reliability": 46, "schema": 73, "security": 71, "transparency": 55 }, "provenanceScore": 49, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-11", "maintenance": "2026-11-11", "payments": "2026-11-11", "reliability": "2026-11-11", "schema": "2026-11-11", "security": "2026-11-11", "transparency": "2026-11-11" }, "last": "2026-11-11", "lastMoved": "2026-11-13", "oldest": "2026-11-11", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "http": "curl https://tokenhub.tencentmaas.com/v1/chat/completions \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer $TOKENHUB_API_KEY\" -H \"content-type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"model\":\"hy4\",\"messages\":[{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"hello\"}]}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/inference.llm", "tool": "https://letme.dev/hy4" }, "sameCompany": [ "hy-memory", "tencentdb-agent-memory", "hunyuanocr", "octop", "hy-memory-30b-a3b", "hy3", "wevisone-vl-2b", "wevisone-vl-4b" ], "sameModel": [ "tencent-tokenhub" ], "area": "models", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Hy4 input", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 0.9, "note": "¥6 list, about US$0.90 per Tencent; billed at 50% until 31 December 2026" }, { "item": "Hy4 cached input", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 0.045, "note": "¥0.3 list" }, { "item": "Hy4 output", "unit": "1m-tokens", "usd": 2.7, "note": "¥18 list" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Tencent Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (腾讯云计算（北京）有限责任公司)", "domain": "tencentmaas.com", "domainRegistered": "2026-03-13", "endpointOnVendorDomain": false, "terms": "https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/301/129852", "privacy": "https://privacy.qq.com/document/preview/91d5fd3c98ce4468ae462ac59233bba2", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1823/130675", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-11", "notes": [ "The TokenHub Terms of Service (effective 14 September 2026), the SLA (effective 23 April 2026) and the special note on third-party deployed models (effective 14 September 2026) name 腾讯云计算（北京）有限责任公司. The docs footer also names 深圳市腾讯计算机系统有限公司 as ICP licence holder.", "The TokenHub privacy policy is linked from the docs to privacy.qq.com, which renders only with JavaScript, so it was not read. privacy.qq.com has no robots.txt (404).", "No public status page was found. status.cloud.tencent.com did not answer, and the Tencent Cloud health dashboard documentation answered with a bot check.", "security.txt answered 404 on cloud.tencent.com, www.tencent.com and tokenhub.tencentmaas.com. Tencent's bug bounty policy at en.security.tencent.com lists Tencent Cloud in scope.", "RDAP at Verisign gives tencentmaas.com a registration date of 13 March 2026 with no registrant. The API answers at tokenhub.tencentmaas.com and tokenhub-intl.tencentmaas.com, named in Tencent Cloud's API usage page.", "cloud.tencent.com allows these docs in robots.txt. Its pages answered some requests with a JavaScript bot check, which was not passed. The pages were read when a later plain request returned them. www.tencentcloud.com answered robots.txt with a bot check, so the international site was not read." ], "score": 49 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy4.json", "live": { "slug": "hy4", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://tencentmaas.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "unknown", "checkedAt": "2026-11-13T16:16:35.489580858Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1823/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-13T15:54:34.939672287Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/1823/130675", "kind": "changelog", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-13T18:11:34.856577424Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "e3b0c44298fc" }, { "url": "https://privacy.qq.com/document/preview/91d5fd3c98ce4468ae462ac59233bba2", "kind": "privacy", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-13T18:28:00.062507799Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "e3b0c44298fc" }, { "url": "https://cloud.tencent.com/document/product/301/129852", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-13T18:11:36.909670614Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "e3b0c44298fc" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-11-13T18:28:00.062507799Z" } }, "answer": "Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Beam 1.0's 54.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Beam 1.0 leads on reliability, schema \u0026 documentation and transparency \u0026 trust.", "b": { "slug": "reflection-beam", "name": "Beam 1.0", "vendor": "Reflection", "vendorUrl": "https://reflection.ai", "kind": "model", "category": "inference", "summary": "Beam 1.0 is Reflection's open-weight text model for coding, reasoning and agentic work, with 501B total and 23B active parameters and a 1M-token context, served by the Reflection API and released as Apache-2.0 weights.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/reflection-beam", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/reflection-beam.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/reflection-beam.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/reflection-beam.json", "dns": "reflection-beam.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://huggingface.co/reflection/Beam-1.0-501B-A23B", "license": "Weights under Apache-2.0. The hosted Reflection API is a closed service under Reflection's commercial terms of service", "transports": [ "http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1", "packages": [], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Bearer API key created by a person on platform.reflection.ai under API Keys. Each key belongs to one project and to the user who made it, is shown once, can be revoked from the API Keys page, and is disabled if that user leaves the organisation or project. No scopes, expiry or key-management API found. The docs say some organisations must verify a credit card in Billing before their keys work (`payment_method_required`). Self-hosted weights need no account; the Hugging Face repositories are not gated.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "No per-token or plan price for the Reflection API is published on a page we can read. The rate-limits docs describe a daily token allowance that renews at 00:00 UTC and ask those requesting higher limits whether they want paid usage, and some organisations must verify a credit card before keys work (https://developers.reflection.ai/rate-limits.md, checked 2026-11-04). Reflection's beta pricing page and terms are on reflection.ai, which disallows our crawler. The weights are free to self-host under Apache-2.0.", "priceSummary": "Freemium", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the Reflection docs, llms.txt or OpenAPI document. Access needs a browser sign-up on platform.reflection.ai and an API key (checked 2026-11-04).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-17" }, "docsUrl": "https://developers.reflection.ai/introduction", "rateLimitsUrl": "https://developers.reflection.ai/rate-limits", "llmsTxt": "https://developers.reflection.ai/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://developers.reflection.ai/api-reference/openapi.yaml", "capabilities": [ "inference.llm", "inference.open-weights" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "model", "open-weights", "self-hosted", "free", "openai-compatible", "openapi", "llms-txt", "status-page", "apache-2.0", "gpu", "new" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-16", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 54.1, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1000, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1524, "categoryRank": 38, "methodology": "0.8", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 50, "payments": 15, "reliability": 52, "schema": 84, "security": 45, "transparency": 57 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-11-04" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "The Reflection API is OpenAI-compatible, with an OpenAPI document, strict structured outputs and tool calls, and error codes that say when to retry, and the weights are Apache-2.0. No price or rate-limit figure is published on a readable page, reasoning can't be turned off, and the API had two full outages on 14 and 15 October 2026.", "bestFor": "An OpenAI-compatible endpoint for a large open-weight coding and agent model, for builders who want the same model hosted or self-hosted under Apache-2.0.", "strengths": [ "OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions with `tool_choice`, parallel tool calls, strict tool schemas and `json_schema` structured outputs", "Error reference lists every status and code with whether to retry, and responses carry `Retry-After`, `x-should-retry` and `x-request-id`", "OpenAPI 3.0.3 document, llms.txt, a Markdown copy of every page and a docs MCP endpoint at developers.reflection.ai/mcp", "1,048,576-token context and up to 131,072 output tokens, with reasoning returned in its own `reasoning_content` field", "Weights in BF16, FP8 and NVFP4 under Apache-2.0, ungated, with Reflection's guides for SGLang, vLLM, TokenSpeed, Transformers, Helm and Dynamo" ], "weaknesses": [ "No SLA, and per-organisation rate limits and the daily token allowance are not published as numbers", "Reasoning is mandatory and defaults to `max`, and a tool-call turn returned without `reasoning_content` makes every later request in that session fail", "No per-token price, retention period or subprocessor list on a page we can read; Reflection's terms and pricing pages are on a host that disallows our crawler", "Two API incidents labelled full outages on 14 and 15 October 2026 and three partial ones to 3 November", "No changelog and no model deprecation notice period found" ], "agentNotes": [ "Send `reasoning_effort` `low` or `medium` for short tasks. The default is `max`, and `none` or `minimal` return `400 unsupported_value`", "Return every assistant message with its `reasoning_content` unchanged. If a turn comes back without it, start a new conversation, since later requests fail with `missing_required_parameter`", "Don't rely on `stop` or `seed`. Both are accepted and ignored, so truncate output in your own code", "Honour `x-should-retry: false` on a 429. It means a daily limit is spent and `Retry-After` counts to 00:00 UTC", "Set `max_completion_tokens` yourself on long prompts. The default budget isn't reduced to fit the prompt and includes reasoning tokens" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 4, "avgRating": 2.5, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.8", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 54.1 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 50, "payments": 15, "reliability": 52, "schema": 84, "security": 45, "transparency": 39 }, "provenanceScore": 74, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-04", "maintenance": "2026-11-04", "payments": "2026-11-04", "reliability": "2026-11-04", "schema": "2026-11-04", "security": "2026-11-04", "transparency": "2026-11-04" }, "last": "2026-11-04", "lastMoved": "2026-11-13", "oldest": "2026-11-04", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "pip install openai # or: npm install openai, with base URL https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1", "http": "curl https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1/chat/completions \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer $REFLECTION_API_KEY\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\n \"model\": \"Beam-1.0-501B-A23B\",\n \"messages\": [\n {\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"Why is the sky blue?\"}\n ]\n }'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/inference.llm", "tool": "https://letme.dev/reflection-beam" }, "sameCompany": [ "reflection-mirror" ], "area": "models", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Reflection AI", "domain": "reflection.ai", "domainRegistered": "2017-12-16", "domainNote": "RDAP gave a registration date of 16 December 2017 and a transfer on 15 March 2024 on 17 October 2026 (not re-read; RDAP is a JSON service), so the domain predates the current owner.", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://reflection.ai/legal/commercial-terms-of-service", "privacy": "https://reflection.ai/legal/privacy-policy", "statusPage": "https://status.reflection.ai", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-04", "notes": [ "reflection.ai's robots.txt disallows ClaudeBot, Claude-Web and anthropic-ai (read 4 November 2026), so the commercial terms, the privacy policy and reflection.ai's security.txt weren't re-read and their 17 October readings are struck. Both URLs are kept as listed facts.", "The legal entity is the copyright holder in the NOTICE files of Reflection's Mirror repository (`Copyright 2026 Reflection AI`), as on the reflection-mirror listing, since the fuller name came from struck pages.", "developers.reflection.ai/.well-known/security.txt returned 404 on 17 October 2026. The model card names reports@reflection.ai for security vulnerabilities.", "No changelog or release notes found in the developers docs or llms.txt (4 November 2026).", "status.reflection.ai answers robots.txt with a plain 404 (no rules) and was read under it." ], "score": 74 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/reflection-beam.json", "live": { "slug": "reflection-beam", "probe": { "target": "https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-11-13T23:58:58.040601004Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 404, "lastMs": 342, "authRequired": false, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 367, "p95ms24h": 448, "samples24h": 239, "samples30d": 6658, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-17", "probes": 21, "ok": 21 }, { "date": "2026-10-18", "probes": 256, "ok": 256 }, { "date": "2026-10-19", "probes": 255, "ok": 255 }, { "date": "2026-10-20", "probes": 252, "ok": 252 }, { "date": "2026-10-21", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-22", "probes": 253, "ok": 253 }, { "date": "2026-10-23", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-10-24", "probes": 251, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-10-25", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-10-26", "probes": 252, "ok": 252 }, { "date": "2026-10-27", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-28", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-10-29", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-30", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-10-31", "probes": 251, "ok": 251 }, { "date": "2026-11-01", "probes": 249, "ok": 249 }, { "date": "2026-11-02", "probes": 250, "ok": 250 }, { "date": "2026-11-03", "probes": 248, "ok": 248 }, { "date": "2026-11-04", "probes": 246, "ok": 246 }, { "date": "2026-11-05", "probes": 185, "ok": 185 }, { "date": "2026-11-06", "probes": 241, "ok": 241 }, { "date": "2026-11-07", "probes": 243, "ok": 243 }, { "date": "2026-11-08", "probes": 243, "ok": 243 }, { "date": "2026-11-09", "probes": 243, "ok": 243 }, { "date": "2026-11-10", "probes": 244, "ok": 244 }, { "date": "2026-11-11", "probes": 244, "ok": 244 }, { "date": "2026-11-12", "probes": 245, "ok": 245 }, { "date": "2026-11-13", "probes": 238, "ok": 238 } ], "since": "2026-10-17T00:00:00Z" }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.reflection.ai", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-11-13T23:55:25.549686743Z" }, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://reflection.ai/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-13T16:15:30.17994101Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://developers.reflection.ai/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-13T15:55:46.726821041Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "reflection.ai", "registered": "2017-12-16", "source": "https://rdap.identitydigital.services/rdap/domain/reflection.ai", "checkedAt": "2026-11-08T15:05:49.098411889Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://reflection.ai/legal/privacy-policy", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-13T18:28:46.442345687Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-13T18:28:46.442345687Z", "fingerprint": "f1690f8d7ff0" }, { "url": "https://reflection.ai/legal/commercial-terms-of-service", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-13T18:28:43.929365252Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-07T14:18:12.998666824Z", "fingerprint": "34980ad61f53" } ], "models": { "reflection/beam-1.0-501b-a23b": { "openrouterId": "reflection/beam-1.0-501b-a23b", "tools": true, "structuredOutputs": true, "jsonMode": true, "reasoning": true, "input": [ "text" ], "promptCaching": true, "contextTokens": 1048576, "maxOutput": 131072, "checkedAt": "2026-11-03T23:49:21.261568406Z" } }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-13T23:58:58.040601004Z" }, "streak": { "days": 28, "from": "2026-10-17", "sinceWatching": true, "best": 28 } }, "edges": [ { "by": 30, "category": "payments", "leads": "hy4", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No machine payment protocol (0). The price page, updated 9 November, lists ¥6 input, ¥0.3 cached and ¥18 output per million tokens, with Hy4 billed at 50% until 31 December 2026 (20). TokenHub's campaign of 1M free tokens per language model, read on 1 November, isn't confirmed for hy4 on the price page, so half (10 of 20, a judgement call). A person signs up with real-name verification (0). 0 + 20 + 10 + 0 = 30. Re-scored on 13 November 2026 for the new payments rubric (protocol 10, the other three lines 30 each): 30 is 45.", "b": "Graded on the Reflection API. No x402, MPP or L402 (0). No per-token, plan or allocation price is published on any readable page; the beta pricing page on reflection.ai is struck (0, was 10). Free tier 10 of 20, partial kept. The rate-limits page describes a daily token allowance and asks those requesting higher limits whether they are \"interested in paid usage\", and the authentication page says some organisations must verify a credit card before keys work. A person signs up in the browser at platform.reflection.ai to get a key (0). 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 10. Re-scored on 13 November 2026 for the new payments rubric (protocol 10, the other three lines 30 each): 10 is 15." }, "scores": { "a": 45, "b": 15 } }, { "by": 26, "category": "security", "leads": "hy4", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reasons": { "a": "Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Bearer keys limited by model, service, IP range and token quota, long-lived with no rotation (26 of 30). The terms say inputs aren't used to train Tencent Cloud's own models, and Hy4 is first party, so no third party's terms apply (14 of 20). Retention only as long as the service needs, no periods (7 of 15). Per-call audit logs and optional full logs to the customer's CLS (14 of 15). No security.txt; Tencent's TSRC bounty covers Tencent Cloud; no certification checked (10 of 20). 26 + 14 + 7 + 14 + 10 = 71.", "b": "Model reading. API keys per project, revocable, shown once and disabled when their creator leaves, with no scopes, expiry or rotation API found (20 of 30). Training 10 of 20, partial kept. The API reference says each response's `reflection-data-retention` header reports `contributor` when content may be used to train Reflection's models \"under contributor terms your organization accepted\". The API safety page and commercial terms read on 17 October are struck (reflection.ai now disallows our crawler), so whether training is off by default can't be read. Retention 5 of 15, partial kept. The header can report `zero`, `standard` or `contributor`, and no readable page states periods or whether zero retention is offered. `x-request-id` on every response and the retention header, with usage dashboards behind the login and not read (5 of 15). Security programme 5 of 20 (was 6). The model card names reports@reflection.ai for security vulnerabilities; developers.reflection.ai has no security.txt (404 on 17 October), and the safety report and reflection.ai's security.txt can't be read. No bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001 found on a readable page. 20 + 10 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 45." }, "scores": { "a": 71, "b": 45 } }, { "by": 23, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "hy4", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Added on 4 November 2026 per the release notes; the model list and price page were updated on 9 November (30). Retirement notices of 21 to 33 days, no minimum written (7 of 12). Heavy retirement churn on the platform (3 of 8). Dated release notes and announcements, round-the-clock support (13 of 15). CLI replies not sampled (3 of 10). Control-plane SDKs and CLI, no inference SDK of its own (12 of 15). CLI runtime stated, CI not checked (5 of 10). 30 + 7 + 3 + 13 + 3 + 12 + 5 = 73. The model is a week old, so these lines are TokenHub's habits more than Hy4's record.", "b": "Model reading. The weights were published on 16 October 2026, the date on the Hugging Face model page (the repository was created on 7 October); later commits to 30 October add evaluation results and a guide, which record no model change (30). One model, with a `shutdown_date` field and a lifecycle section in the docs but no notice period for retirements, and no history of releases or retirements yet (4 of 20). No changelog. Support through the platform and developers@reflection.ai for higher limits, and the model card names reports@reflection.ai. The Hub page shows 15 discussions (10 open, 5 closed), replies not sampled (6 of 25). No first-party SDK, the docs rely on the OpenAI SDKs (5 of 15). Reflection's serving guides for vLLM, SGLang, TokenSpeed, Transformers and Dynamo, a Beam Verifier repository, and fine-tuning recipes now published for NeMo AutoModel, Megatron Bridge, Axolotl and TRL (5 of 10, partial kept). 30 + 4 + 6 + 5 + 5 = 50." }, "scores": { "a": 73, "b": 50 } }, { "by": 19, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "hy4", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Function calling is marked for hy4 in the model list (18 of 20). Structured output marked (13 of 15). Cache-hit price published, ¥0.3 against ¥6 input (14 of 15). 1M-token context with 960K input and 64K output (15). Batch at half price covered Hy3 and Hy4 preview on 1 November; whether it covers hy4 wasn't re-read (3 of 10). OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs with a changed base URL, plus Tencent Cloud's SDK and CLI for the control plane (8 of 10). Errors with code, messages, upstream status and request ID (15 of 15). 18 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 3 + 8 + 15 = 86.", "b": "Model reading (tool use, structured output, caching, context, batch, SDKs and defaults, errors). `tool_choice` of auto, none, required or a named function, `parallel_tool_calls`, strict tools and up to 128 tools. The tool-calling loop needs `reasoning_content` sent back on every assistant turn, and the docs say the model sometimes returns a tool-call step without it, after which every request in the session fails (12 of 20). `json_object` and strict `json_schema` (15). Cached prompt tokens are reported in `usage`, but caching can't be steered, the `prompt_cache_*` options are ignored and no cached price exists in the beta (5 of 10). 1,048,576-token context and 131,072 output tokens (15). No batch endpoint (0 of 10). No Reflection SDK, the OpenAI Python and TypeScript SDKs are documented, and defaults cost an agent turns, with reasoning always on at `max`, `stop` and `seed` ignored and a default output budget not reduced to fit the prompt (5 of 10). Machine-readable `error.code` values with `param`, `x-should-retry`, `Retry-After` and `x-request-id` (15). 12 + 15 + 5 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 = 67, per the 17 October reading of the developers guides, not re-read on 4 November beyond the models and rate-limits pages." }, "scores": { "a": 86, "b": 67 } }, { "by": 11, "category": "schema", "leads": "reflection-beam", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No OpenAPI file for inference; field pages for the OpenAI and Anthropic formats as TokenHub implements them (12 of 25). llms.txt with Markdown copies (10). The model list, updated 9 November, gives hy4's context, input and output limits and marks thinking, structured output, function calling, caching and image understanding; computer use, which Tencent's release names, isn't marked (13 of 20). Typed field pages (10 of 15). Examples in five languages and an error page of 30 codes (14 of 15). Dated release notes, with hy4 added on 4 November (14 of 15). 12 + 10 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 14 = 73.", "b": "Model reading. OpenAPI 3.0.3 document, version 0.1.0, covering all three documented endpoints with typed schemas and error examples. A second 'Reflection client' base URL, https://api.reflection.ai/v1, is named with no endpoints documented (22 of 25). llms.txt, a Markdown copy of every page and a docs MCP endpoint (10). The guides say which reasoning effort suits which task, which OpenAI parameters are fixed, ignored or unsupported and which endpoints don't exist, so a model knows what not to send (17 of 20). `reasoning_effort` is an enum, strict JSON Schema for tools and `json_schema` output with the unsupported keywords and size limits listed, and unknown parameters return `unsupported_parameter` (15). curl, Python and TypeScript examples on every guide, and an error reference with every status, `error.code` and retry advice (15). The model ID carries its version and the models endpoint has a `shutdown_date` field, but no changelog or release notes were found (5 of 15). 22 + 10 + 17 + 15 + 15 + 5 = 84. The OpenAPI file is linked from llms.txt; the guides beyond the overview, models, rate limits, authentication and reference overview pages are per the 17 October check." }, "scores": { "a": 73, "b": 84 } }, { "by": 6, "category": "reliability", "leads": "reflection-beam", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No public status page (0) and so no incident record to read (5 of 30). Per-model rate limits only in the console and DescribeModelQuota (8 of 15). Six 429 codes, Retry-After and backoff advice (13 of 15). The TokenHub SLA promises 99.5% a month, and Hy4 is Tencent's own model, so the third-party exclusion doesn't apply (10). Released as hy4 on 4 November, a separate id from hy4-preview, with no preview label (10). 0 + 5 + 8 + 13 + 10 + 10 = 46.", "b": "Hosted lines, for the Reflection API. Status page at status.reflection.ai on incident.io, with API, platform and developer docs components and Atom and RSS feeds (20). In the 90 days to 4 November 2026 its incident pages list two full outages of the API component, a serving cluster down from 22:01 to 23:20 UTC on 14 October and elevated errors from 06:10 to 07:10 UTC on 15 October, each an hour or more, so two majors. Three more are labelled partial outages (16 October 02:28 to 02:38 UTC, 22 October rate-limit errors in two windows, 3 November about 20:10 to 21:38 UTC on one inference provider), read as minor. Two majors give 5. Rate limits are described per organisation in requests and tokens per minute and per day, with concurrency caps and headers, but no figures are published (5 of 15). 429 and 503 responses carry `Retry-After`, daily limits add `x-should-retry: false`, and the errors page says which codes to retry, with exponential backoff and jitter. There are no idempotency keys, and a chat completion is the billed call, so this run's value for retry guidance without idempotency keys gives 12 (was 15). No SLA found (0). The developers docs read on 4 November carry no beta or preview label for the API; the earlier beta reading came from reflection.ai pages now struck (10). 20 + 5 + 5 + 12 + 0 + 10 = 52." }, "scores": { "a": 46, "b": 52 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "Model API", "b": "Model API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Tencent (Hy team)", "b": "Reflection", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP", "b": "HTTP", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Freemium", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "Hosted model under the Tencent Cloud TokenHub terms. Tencent says weights and a system card will follow; no licence is stated yet", "b": "Weights under Apache-2.0. The hosted Reflection API is a closed service under Reflection's commercial terms of service", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-11-04", "b": "2026-10-16", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "2026-10-05", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "2026-08-28", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "yes", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "yes", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "none", "b": "2.5/5 (4)", "name": "Agent reviews" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Beam 1.0's 54.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Beam 1.0 leads on reliability, schema \u0026 documentation and transparency \u0026 trust.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Tencent Hy4 or Beam 1.0?" }, { "answer": "Both need an API key.", "question": "Do Tencent Hy4 and Beam 1.0 need an API key?" }, { "answer": "No hosted endpoint is listed for Tencent Hy4. Beam 1.0 has a hosted endpoint at https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1.", "question": "Can an agent call Tencent Hy4 and Beam 1.0 without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Agent ergonomics, 86 against 67", "Security \u0026 auth, 71 against 45", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 45 against 15", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 73 against 50" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "Long-context agent work, coding and office or finance tasks on a 1M-token context with images, for teams already on Tencent Cloud or happy to verify an account there.", "slug": "hy4", "watchFor": "Weights, licence and system card are promised but not published; tencent/Hy4 didn't answer on Hugging Face on 11 November" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 52 against 46", "Schema \u0026 documentation, 84 against 73", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 57 against 52" ], "also": [ "A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install" ], "goodFor": "An OpenAI-compatible endpoint for a large open-weight coding and agent model, for builders who want the same model hosted or self-hosted under Apache-2.0.", "slug": "reflection-beam", "watchFor": "No SLA, and per-organisation rate limits and the daily token allowance are not published as numbers" } ], "history": { "hy4": [ { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-11-13", "delta": 1.8, "from": 62.2, "fromGrade": "B", "to": 64, "toGrade": "B" } ], "reflection-beam": [ { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-11-13", "delta": 0.7, "from": 53.4, "fromGrade": "D", "to": 54.1, "toGrade": "C" }, { "causes": [ "evidence", "correction" ], "date": "2026-11-04", "delta": 0.1, "from": 53.3, "fromGrade": "D", "to": 53.4, "toGrade": "D" }, { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-30", "delta": -0.1, "from": 53.4, "fromGrade": "D", "to": 53.3, "toGrade": "D" } ] }, "job": { "capability": "inference.llm", "name": "LLM inference" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Amazon Bedrock vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Amazon Bedrock vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Claude API vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Claude API vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Antseed vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Antseed vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-hy4.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Cerebras Inference vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Cerebras Inference vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Claude Fable 5.2 vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Claude Fable 5.2 vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Cloudflare Workers AI vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Cloudflare Workers AI vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-hy4.json", "title": "DeepInfra vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "DeepInfra vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-hy4.json", "title": "DeepSeek API vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "DeepSeek API vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Eden AI vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Eden AI vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Glimpse vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Glimpse vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Fireworks AI Inference vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Fireworks AI Inference vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Carbon vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Gemini Developer API vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Gemini Developer API vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-hy4.json", "title": "GroqCloud vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "GroqCloud vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hugging-face-inference-providers-vs-hy4.json", "title": "Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Tencent Hy4", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hugging-face-inference-providers-vs-hy4" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hugging-face-inference-providers-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hugging-face-inference-providers-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-jais-3.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Jais 3", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-jais-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-meta-model-api.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Meta Model API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-meta-model-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-minimax-api.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs MiniMax API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-minimax-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-mistral-api.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Mistral AI API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-mistral-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-ember.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Ember", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-ember" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-spark-open.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Spark Open", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-spark-open" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-novita-ai.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Novita AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-novita-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-openai-api.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs OpenAI API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-openai-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-openrouter.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs OpenRouter", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-openrouter" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-prism-inference.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Prism Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-prism-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-ramp-router.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Router.com (Ramp Router)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-ramp-router" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-routerplus.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs RouterPlus", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-routerplus" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-sambanova.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs SambaCloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-sambanova" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-siliconflow.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs SiliconFlow", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-siliconflow" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-simplismart.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Simplismart", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-simplismart" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-stepfun-api.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs StepFun API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-stepfun-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-tencent-tokenhub.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-tencent-tokenhub" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-together-inference.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Together AI Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-together-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Vercel AI Gateway", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-vercel-ai-gateway" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-vertex-ai.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-vertex-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-xai-api.json", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs xAI API (Grok)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-xai-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jais-3-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Jais 3 vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jais-3-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/meta-model-api-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Meta Model API vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/meta-model-api-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-api-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "MiniMax API vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-api-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-api-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Mistral AI API vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-api-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-ember-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Muse Ember vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-ember-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-spark-open-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Muse Spark Open vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-spark-open-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/novita-ai-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Novita AI vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/novita-ai-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-api-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "OpenAI API vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-api-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openrouter-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "OpenRouter vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openrouter-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Prism Inference vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ramp-router-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Router.com (Ramp Router) vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ramp-router-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-routerplus.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs RouterPlus", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-routerplus" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-sambanova.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs SambaCloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-sambanova" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-siliconflow.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs SiliconFlow", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-siliconflow" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-simplismart.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs Simplismart", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-simplismart" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-stepfun-api.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs StepFun API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-stepfun-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-tencent-tokenhub.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-tencent-tokenhub" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-together-inference.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs Together AI Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-together-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs Vercel AI Gateway", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-vercel-ai-gateway" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-vertex-ai.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-vertex-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-xai-api.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs xAI API (Grok)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-xai-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl-vs-reflection-beam" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "by": 6, "edge": "reflection-beam", "hy4": 46, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "reflection-beam": 52, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 11, "edge": "reflection-beam", "hy4": 73, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reflection-beam": 84, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 19, "edge": "hy4", "hy4": 86, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reflection-beam": 67, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 26, "edge": "hy4", "hy4": 71, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reflection-beam": 45, "weight": 14 }, { "by": 30, "edge": "hy4", "hy4": 45, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reflection-beam": 15, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 23, "edge": "hy4", "hy4": 73, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reflection-beam": 50, "weight": 7 }, { "by": 5, "edge": "reflection-beam", "hy4": 52, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reflection-beam": 57, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Beam 1.0's 54.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Beam 1.0 leads on reliability, schema \u0026 documentation and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do llm inference.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "hy4": "Tencent's flagship model is on TokenHub as hy4, with a 1M-token context, image understanding, function calling and caching, at ¥6 input and ¥18 output per million tokens, half price until the end of 2026. The weights it is called open source for aren't published yet, and every benchmark is Tencent's own.", "reflection-beam": "The Reflection API is OpenAI-compatible, with an OpenAPI document, strict structured outputs and tool calls, and error codes that say when to retry, and the weights are Apache-2.0. No price or rate-limit figure is published on a readable page, reasoning can't be turned off, and the API had two full outages on 14 and 15 October 2026." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-reflection-beam", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-reflection-beam.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-reflection-beam.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-reflection-beam.min.md" }, "markdown": "Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Beam 1.0's 54.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Beam 1.0 leads on reliability, schema \u0026 documentation and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do llm inference.\n\n- Tencent Hy4: grade B, 64/100, rank #595 of 1524. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy4.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hy4.json\n- Beam 1.0: grade C, 54.1/100, rank #1000 of 1524. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/reflection-beam.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/reflection-beam.json\n- Best model APIs and inference for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/inference/index.md\n- All 1044 models comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inference/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Tencent Hy4 (B)\n\nGood for: Long-context agent work, coding and office or finance tasks on a 1M-token context with images, for teams already on Tencent Cloud or happy to verify an account there.\n\nAhead on:\n- Agent ergonomics, 86 against 67\n- Security \u0026 auth, 71 against 45\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 45 against 15\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 73 against 50\n\nWatch for: Weights, licence and system card are promised but not published; tencent/Hy4 didn't answer on Hugging Face on 11 November\n\n### Beam 1.0 (C)\n\nGood for: An OpenAI-compatible endpoint for a large open-weight coding and agent model, for builders who want the same model hosted or self-hosted under Apache-2.0.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 52 against 46\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 84 against 73\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 57 against 52\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install\n\nWatch for: No SLA, and per-organisation rate limits and the daily token allowance are not published as numbers\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Tencent Hy4 +30\n\n- Tencent Hy4 (45): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No machine payment protocol (0). The price page, updated 9 November, lists ¥6 input, ¥0.3 cached and ¥18 output per million tokens, with Hy4 billed at 50% until 31 December 2026 (20). TokenHub's campaign of 1M free tokens per language model, read on 1 November, isn't confirmed for hy4 on the price page, so half (10 of 20, a judgement call). A person signs up with real-name verification (0). 0 + 20 + 10 + 0 = 30. Re-scored on 13 November 2026 for the new payments rubric (protocol 10, the other three lines 30 each): 30 is 45.\n- Beam 1.0 (15): Graded on the Reflection API. No x402, MPP or L402 (0). No per-token, plan or allocation price is published on any readable page; the beta pricing page on reflection.ai is struck (0, was 10). Free tier 10 of 20, partial kept. The rate-limits page describes a daily token allowance and asks those requesting higher limits whether they are \"interested in paid usage\", and the authentication page says some organisations must verify a credit card before keys work. A person signs up in the browser at platform.reflection.ai to get a key (0). 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 10. Re-scored on 13 November 2026 for the new payments rubric (protocol 10, the other three lines 30 each): 10 is 15.\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: Tencent Hy4 +26\n\n- Tencent Hy4 (71): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Bearer keys limited by model, service, IP range and token quota, long-lived with no rotation (26 of 30). The terms say inputs aren't used to train Tencent Cloud's own models, and Hy4 is first party, so no third party's terms apply (14 of 20). Retention only as long as the service needs, no periods (7 of 15). Per-call audit logs and optional full logs to the customer's CLS (14 of 15). No security.txt; Tencent's TSRC bounty covers Tencent Cloud; no certification checked (10 of 20). 26 + 14 + 7 + 14 + 10 = 71.\n- Beam 1.0 (45): Model reading. API keys per project, revocable, shown once and disabled when their creator leaves, with no scopes, expiry or rotation API found (20 of 30). Training 10 of 20, partial kept. The API reference says each response's `reflection-data-retention` header reports `contributor` when content may be used to train Reflection's models \"under contributor terms your organization accepted\". The API safety page and commercial terms read on 17 October are struck (reflection.ai now disallows our crawler), so whether training is off by default can't be read. Retention 5 of 15, partial kept. The header can report `zero`, `standard` or `contributor`, and no readable page states periods or whether zero retention is offered. `x-request-id` on every response and the retention header, with usage dashboards behind the login and not read (5 of 15). Security programme 5 of 20 (was 6). The model card names reports@reflection.ai for security vulnerabilities; developers.reflection.ai has no security.txt (404 on 17 October), and the safety report and reflection.ai's security.txt can't be read. No bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001 found on a readable page. 20 + 10 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 45.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Tencent Hy4 +23\n\n- Tencent Hy4 (73): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Added on 4 November 2026 per the release notes; the model list and price page were updated on 9 November (30). Retirement notices of 21 to 33 days, no minimum written (7 of 12). Heavy retirement churn on the platform (3 of 8). Dated release notes and announcements, round-the-clock support (13 of 15). CLI replies not sampled (3 of 10). Control-plane SDKs and CLI, no inference SDK of its own (12 of 15). CLI runtime stated, CI not checked (5 of 10). 30 + 7 + 3 + 13 + 3 + 12 + 5 = 73. The model is a week old, so these lines are TokenHub's habits more than Hy4's record.\n- Beam 1.0 (50): Model reading. The weights were published on 16 October 2026, the date on the Hugging Face model page (the repository was created on 7 October); later commits to 30 October add evaluation results and a guide, which record no model change (30). One model, with a `shutdown_date` field and a lifecycle section in the docs but no notice period for retirements, and no history of releases or retirements yet (4 of 20). No changelog. Support through the platform and developers@reflection.ai for higher limits, and the model card names reports@reflection.ai. The Hub page shows 15 discussions (10 open, 5 closed), replies not sampled (6 of 25). No first-party SDK, the docs rely on the OpenAI SDKs (5 of 15). Reflection's serving guides for vLLM, SGLang, TokenSpeed, Transformers and Dynamo, a Beam Verifier repository, and fine-tuning recipes now published for NeMo AutoModel, Megatron Bridge, Axolotl and TRL (5 of 10, partial kept). 30 + 4 + 6 + 5 + 5 = 50.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Tencent Hy4 +19\n\n- Tencent Hy4 (86): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Function calling is marked for hy4 in the model list (18 of 20). Structured output marked (13 of 15). Cache-hit price published, ¥0.3 against ¥6 input (14 of 15). 1M-token context with 960K input and 64K output (15). Batch at half price covered Hy3 and Hy4 preview on 1 November; whether it covers hy4 wasn't re-read (3 of 10). OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs with a changed base URL, plus Tencent Cloud's SDK and CLI for the control plane (8 of 10). Errors with code, messages, upstream status and request ID (15 of 15). 18 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 3 + 8 + 15 = 86.\n- Beam 1.0 (67): Model reading (tool use, structured output, caching, context, batch, SDKs and defaults, errors). `tool_choice` of auto, none, required or a named function, `parallel_tool_calls`, strict tools and up to 128 tools. The tool-calling loop needs `reasoning_content` sent back on every assistant turn, and the docs say the model sometimes returns a tool-call step without it, after which every request in the session fails (12 of 20). `json_object` and strict `json_schema` (15). Cached prompt tokens are reported in `usage`, but caching can't be steered, the `prompt_cache_*` options are ignored and no cached price exists in the beta (5 of 10). 1,048,576-token context and 131,072 output tokens (15). No batch endpoint (0 of 10). No Reflection SDK, the OpenAI Python and TypeScript SDKs are documented, and defaults cost an agent turns, with reasoning always on at `max`, `stop` and `seed` ignored and a default output budget not reduced to fit the prompt (5 of 10). Machine-readable `error.code` values with `param`, `x-should-retry`, `Retry-After` and `x-request-id` (15). 12 + 15 + 5 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 = 67, per the 17 October reading of the developers guides, not re-read on 4 November beyond the models and rate-limits pages.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Beam 1.0 +11\n\n- Tencent Hy4 (73): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No OpenAPI file for inference; field pages for the OpenAI and Anthropic formats as TokenHub implements them (12 of 25). llms.txt with Markdown copies (10). The model list, updated 9 November, gives hy4's context, input and output limits and marks thinking, structured output, function calling, caching and image understanding; computer use, which Tencent's release names, isn't marked (13 of 20). Typed field pages (10 of 15). Examples in five languages and an error page of 30 codes (14 of 15). Dated release notes, with hy4 added on 4 November (14 of 15). 12 + 10 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 14 = 73.\n- Beam 1.0 (84): Model reading. OpenAPI 3.0.3 document, version 0.1.0, covering all three documented endpoints with typed schemas and error examples. A second 'Reflection client' base URL, https://api.reflection.ai/v1, is named with no endpoints documented (22 of 25). llms.txt, a Markdown copy of every page and a docs MCP endpoint (10). The guides say which reasoning effort suits which task, which OpenAI parameters are fixed, ignored or unsupported and which endpoints don't exist, so a model knows what not to send (17 of 20). `reasoning_effort` is an enum, strict JSON Schema for tools and `json_schema` output with the unsupported keywords and size limits listed, and unknown parameters return `unsupported_parameter` (15). curl, Python and TypeScript examples on every guide, and an error reference with every status, `error.code` and retry advice (15). The model ID carries its version and the models endpoint has a `shutdown_date` field, but no changelog or release notes were found (5 of 15). 22 + 10 + 17 + 15 + 15 + 5 = 84. The OpenAPI file is linked from llms.txt; the guides beyond the overview, models, rate limits, authentication and reference overview pages are per the 17 October check.\n\n### Reliability: Beam 1.0 +6\n\n- Tencent Hy4 (46): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No public status page (0) and so no incident record to read (5 of 30). Per-model rate limits only in the console and DescribeModelQuota (8 of 15). Six 429 codes, Retry-After and backoff advice (13 of 15). The TokenHub SLA promises 99.5% a month, and Hy4 is Tencent's own model, so the third-party exclusion doesn't apply (10). Released as hy4 on 4 November, a separate id from hy4-preview, with no preview label (10). 0 + 5 + 8 + 13 + 10 + 10 = 46.\n- Beam 1.0 (52): Hosted lines, for the Reflection API. Status page at status.reflection.ai on incident.io, with API, platform and developer docs components and Atom and RSS feeds (20). In the 90 days to 4 November 2026 its incident pages list two full outages of the API component, a serving cluster down from 22:01 to 23:20 UTC on 14 October and elevated errors from 06:10 to 07:10 UTC on 15 October, each an hour or more, so two majors. Three more are labelled partial outages (16 October 02:28 to 02:38 UTC, 22 October rate-limit errors in two windows, 3 November about 20:10 to 21:38 UTC on one inference provider), read as minor. Two majors give 5. Rate limits are described per organisation in requests and tokens per minute and per day, with concurrency caps and headers, but no figures are published (5 of 15). 429 and 503 responses carry `Retry-After`, daily limits add `x-should-retry: false`, and the errors page says which codes to retry, with exponential backoff and jitter. There are no idempotency keys, and a chat completion is the billed call, so this run's value for retry guidance without idempotency keys gives 12 (was 15). No SLA found (0). The developers docs read on 4 November carry no beta or preview label for the API; the earlier beta reading came from reflection.ai pages now struck (10). 20 + 5 + 5 + 12 + 0 + 10 = 52.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Tencent Hy4 | Beam 1.0 | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 46 | 52 | Beam 1.0 +6 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 73 | 84 | Beam 1.0 +11 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 86 | 67 | Tencent Hy4 +19 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 71 | 45 | Tencent Hy4 +26 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 45 | 15 | Tencent Hy4 +30 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 73 | 50 | Tencent Hy4 +23 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 52 | 57 | Beam 1.0 +5 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **64 · B** | **54.1 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Tencent Hy4 | Beam 1.0 |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | Model API | Model API |\n| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Reflection |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1` |\n| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |\n| Auth | API key | API key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Hosted model under the Tencent Cloud TokenHub terms. Tencent says weights and a system card will follow; no licence is stated yet | Weights under Apache-2.0. The hosted Reflection API is a closed service under Reflection's commercial terms of service |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-16 |\n| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-10-05 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-08-28 |\n| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | yes |\n| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |\n| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |\n\n## How the scores have moved\n\n### Tencent Hy4\n\n- +1.8 on 13 November 2026: checklist\n\n### Beam 1.0\n\n- +0.7 on 13 November 2026 (D to C): checklist\n- +0.1 on 4 November 2026: new evidence, correction\n- -0.1 on 30 October 2026: checklist\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Tencent Hy4.** Tencent's flagship model is on TokenHub as hy4, with a 1M-token context, image understanding, function calling and caching, at ¥6 input and ¥18 output per million tokens, half price until the end of 2026. The weights it is called open source for aren't published yet, and every benchmark is Tencent's own.\n\n**Beam 1.0.** The Reflection API is OpenAI-compatible, with an OpenAPI document, strict structured outputs and tool calls, and error codes that say when to retry, and the weights are Apache-2.0. No price or rate-limit figure is published on a readable page, reasoning can't be turned off, and the API had two full outages on 14 and 15 October 2026.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Tencent Hy4\n\n1. Use model id hy4 on TokenHub's OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoints; hy4-preview is a separate, older model\n2. Keep input under 960K tokens and expect at most 64K output\n3. Reuse prompt prefixes: cached input is ¥0.3 against ¥6\n4. Check the price page for the end of the 50% discount on 31 December 2026 before budgeting\n5. Read rate limits from the console or DescribeModelQuota; the public docs don't give them for chat models\n\n### Beam 1.0\n\n1. Send `reasoning_effort` `low` or `medium` for short tasks. The default is `max`, and `none` or `minimal` return `400 unsupported_value`\n2. Return every assistant message with its `reasoning_content` unchanged. If a turn comes back without it, start a new conversation, since later requests fail with `missing_required_parameter`\n3. Don't rely on `stop` or `seed`. Both are accepted and ignored, so truncate output in your own code\n4. Honour `x-should-retry: false` on a 429. It means a daily limit is spent and `Retry-After` counts to 00:00 UTC\n5. Set `max_completion_tokens` yourself on long prompts. The default budget isn't reduced to fit the prompt and includes reasoning tokens\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Tencent Hy4 or Beam 1.0?\n\nTencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Beam 1.0's 54.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Beam 1.0 leads on reliability, schema \u0026 documentation and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Do Tencent Hy4 and Beam 1.0 need an API key?\n\nBoth need an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Tencent Hy4 and Beam 1.0 without installing anything?\n\nNo hosted endpoint is listed for Tencent Hy4. Beam 1.0 has a hosted endpoint at https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-reflection-beam.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-reflection-beam.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"hy4\", \"b\": \"reflection-beam\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare hy4 reflection-beam`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hy4.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/reflection-beam.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Tencent Hy4 or Beam 1.0\n\n- [Amazon Bedrock vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Amazon Bedrock vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Claude API vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Claude API vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Antseed vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Antseed vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-hy4.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Cerebras Inference vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Cerebras Inference vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Claude Fable 5.2 vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Claude Fable 5.2 vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Cloudflare Workers AI vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Cloudflare Workers AI vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [DeepInfra vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-hy4.md)\n- [DeepInfra vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [DeepSeek API vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-hy4.md)\n- [DeepSeek API vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Eden AI vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Eden AI vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Glimpse vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Glimpse vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Fireworks AI Inference vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Fireworks AI Inference vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Gemini Developer API vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Gemini Developer API vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [GroqCloud vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-hy4.md)\n- [GroqCloud vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hugging-face-inference-providers-vs-hy4.md)\n- [Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hugging-face-inference-providers-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Jais 3](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-jais-3.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Meta Model API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-meta-model-api.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs MiniMax API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-minimax-api.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Mistral AI API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-mistral-api.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Ember](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-ember.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Spark Open](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-spark-open.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Novita AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-novita-ai.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs OpenAI API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-openai-api.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs OpenRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-openrouter.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-prism-inference.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Router.com (Ramp Router)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-ramp-router.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs RouterPlus](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-routerplus.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs SambaCloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-sambanova.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs SiliconFlow](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-siliconflow.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Simplismart](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-simplismart.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs StepFun API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-stepfun-api.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-tencent-tokenhub.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Together AI Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-together-inference.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Vercel AI Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-vertex-ai.md)\n- [Tencent Hy4 vs xAI API (Grok)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-xai-api.md)\n- [Jais 3 vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jais-3-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Meta Model API vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/meta-model-api-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [MiniMax API vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-api-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Mistral AI API vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-api-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Muse Ember vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-ember-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Muse Spark Open vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-spark-open-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Novita AI vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/novita-ai-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [OpenAI API vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-api-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [OpenRouter vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openrouter-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Prism Inference vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Router.com (Ramp Router) vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ramp-router-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs RouterPlus](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-routerplus.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs SambaCloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-sambanova.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs SiliconFlow](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-siliconflow.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs Simplismart](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-simplismart.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs StepFun API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-stepfun-api.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-tencent-tokenhub.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs Together AI Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-together-inference.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs Vercel AI Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-vertex-ai.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs xAI API (Grok)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-xai-api.md)\n- [Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-14", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.8", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Tencent Hy4 vs Beam 1.0", "url": "" } ], "description": "Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) to Beam 1.0's 54.1 (C) for llm inference. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Tencent Hy4 B 64", "Beam 1.0 C 54.1", "scores" ], "h1": "Tencent Hy4 vs Beam 1.0", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/hy4-vs-reflection-beam", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Tencent Hy4 vs Beam 1.0 for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-13", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-reflection-beam" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 7100, "slim": 980 }, "version": 1 }