# Tencent Hy4 vs Prism Inference

> Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) to Prism Inference's 60.8 (C) for llm inference. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-prism-inference
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-prism-inference.md (~6,950 tokens)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (the key docs and every listing in one file, at most 16 MB, about 4 million tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (the whole catalogue as tools, no key)
- DNS: dig +short TXT <slug>.grade.anchorterminal.com (the grade as a DNS TXT record, for a sandbox with no HTTP where names still resolve; also top., best.<category>. and <a>.vs.<b>. under the zone, and the same under grade.letme.dev)
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)
- Updated: 2026-11-13

Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Prism Inference's 60.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Prism Inference leads on reliability, schema & documentation and transparency & trust. Both do llm inference.

- Tencent Hy4: grade B, 64/100, rank #595 of 1524. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy4.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hy4.json
- Prism Inference: grade C, 60.8/100, rank #738 of 1524. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/prism-inference.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/prism-inference.json
- Best model APIs and inference for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/inference/index.md
- All 1044 models comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inference/index.md

## Which one, for what

### Tencent Hy4 (B)

Good for: Long-context agent work, coding and office or finance tasks on a 1M-token context with images, for teams already on Tencent Cloud or happy to verify an account there.

Ahead on:
- Agent ergonomics, 86 against 68
- Payments & pricing, 45 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 73 against 49

Watch for: Weights, licence and system card are promised but not published; tencent/Hy4 didn't answer on Hugging Face on 11 November

### Prism Inference (C)

Good for: Coding agents that want DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash at a low input price, with no retention, through whichever of the three wire formats the harness already speaks.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 65 against 46
- Schema & documentation, 82 against 73
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 52

Also in its favour:
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for: Two models. The docs mark Gemma 4 31B as request access per organisation, while llms.txt lists it as available


## Why the edge

### Maintenance & community: Tencent Hy4 +24

- Tencent Hy4 (73): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Added on 4 November 2026 per the release notes; the model list and price page were updated on 9 November (30). Retirement notices of 21 to 33 days, no minimum written (7 of 12). Heavy retirement churn on the platform (3 of 8). Dated release notes and announcements, round-the-clock support (13 of 15). CLI replies not sampled (3 of 10). Control-plane SDKs and CLI, no inference SDK of its own (12 of 15). CLI runtime stated, CI not checked (5 of 10). 30 + 7 + 3 + 13 + 3 + 12 + 5 = 73. The model is a week old, so these lines are TokenHub's habits more than Hy4's record.
- Prism Inference (49): Model reading. Gemma 4 31B was added to the catalogue on 6 October 2026, 29 days before this check, and nothing newer is dated in the changelog or on the blog, whose newest post is of 9 September (30). No notice period is stated. The terms promise advance notice of a material breaking change 'when reasonably practicable', and no model has been retired (3 of 12). No model shutdowns since launch (8 of 8). A dated changelog with one entry, a Discord server and a support booking link, none of which we tested for replies (8 of 15). No SDK repository to sample. The Hermes provider plugin on GitHub still has three commits, all on 15 September 2026 (0 of 10). No official SDKs (0 of 15) and no packages to assess (0 of 10). 30+3+8+8+0 = 49.

### Reliability: Prism Inference +19

- Tencent Hy4 (46): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No public status page (0) and so no incident record to read (5 of 30). Per-model rate limits only in the console and DescribeModelQuota (8 of 15). Six 429 codes, Retry-After and backoff advice (13 of 15). The TokenHub SLA promises 99.5% a month, and Hy4 is Tencent's own model, so the third-party exclusion doesn't apply (10). Released as hy4 on 4 November, a separate id from hy4-preview, with no preview label (10). 0 + 5 + 8 + 13 + 10 + 10 = 46.
- Prism Inference (65): Hosted reading. Status page at status.prisminference.com on incident.io with a component for each of the two models, per the 8 October check (20). The 8 October incident reading came only from the page's `/api/v2` incidents feed, a data endpoint this run doesn't use, so it is struck. On 4 November the status host's robots.txt answered a plain 404 (no rules), and the status page itself shows both models at 100 per cent uptime from 5 August to 3 November with "No incidents", data available only from 6 October 2026. The page has never posted an incident, and its record covers 29 days of the 90, so the short-record value applies, as for excaliclaw and serpkite (15). The rate-limits page says per-key limits exist and publishes no numbers, and a 4 MiB request cap was documented on 8 October (5). 429 carries `Retry-After` in seconds, errors carry a `retryable` flag, and the docs give bounded exponential backoff with jitter and rules for retrying interrupted streams (15). No published SLA. The terms of 9 September 2026 say the services have no guaranteed uptime or service credit without a separate written agreement, although the home page still shows a '99.99% Uptime SLA' tile (0). The serverless API isn't labelled beta or preview, though the OpenAPI file is at version 0.1.0 (10). 20+15+5+15+0+10 = 65.

### Agent ergonomics: Tencent Hy4 +18

- Tencent Hy4 (86): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Function calling is marked for hy4 in the model list (18 of 20). Structured output marked (13 of 15). Cache-hit price published, ¥0.3 against ¥6 input (14 of 15). 1M-token context with 960K input and 64K output (15). Batch at half price covered Hy3 and Hy4 preview on 1 November; whether it covers hy4 wasn't re-read (3 of 10). OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs with a changed base URL, plus Tencent Cloud's SDK and CLI for the control plane (8 of 10). Errors with code, messages, upstream status and request ID (15 of 15). 18 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 3 + 8 + 15 = 86.
- Prism Inference (68): Model reading of the checklist (tool use, structured output, caching, context, batch, SDKs, errors). OpenAI function tools, Anthropic tool-use blocks, `tool_choice` and `parallel_tool_calls` on Responses are documented (18 of 20). JSON mode and strict JSON Schema on Chat Completions, and `text.format` on Responses (15). A cache-read price is published for both models, $0.03 against $0.09 input on DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash on 4 November, but no page explains how caching is triggered, and the Claude Code guide says prompt-cache hints are accepted and ignored (5 of 15). 1M-token context and 384,000 output tokens on DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, 32,768 on Gemma 4 31B (15). Batch appears on the pricing page as a sales-led tier with no API in the OpenAPI file (0). No SDK of its own. OpenAI and Anthropic clients are used with a base URL change (0). The errors page (8 October) and the rate-limits page (4 November) document `code`, `retryable`, `fix` and `docs_url` on every error (15). 18+15+5+15+0+0+15 = 68.

### Payments & pricing: Tencent Hy4 +15

- Tencent Hy4 (45): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No machine payment protocol (0). The price page, updated 9 November, lists ¥6 input, ¥0.3 cached and ¥18 output per million tokens, with Hy4 billed at 50% until 31 December 2026 (20). TokenHub's campaign of 1M free tokens per language model, read on 1 November, isn't confirmed for hy4 on the price page, so half (10 of 20, a judgement call). A person signs up with real-name verification (0). 0 + 20 + 10 + 0 = 30. Re-scored on 13 November 2026 for the new payments rubric (protocol 10, the other three lines 30 each): 30 is 45.
- Prism Inference (30): No machine payment protocol (0). Per-token prices are on the pricing page with no login (20). No free tier or trial credit was found. Billing is prepaid and a person funds the workspace in a browser (0). Agent self-signup is closed. The docs say the legacy agent-signup endpoints return `403 signup_disabled`, prisminference.com/signup redirects to the login page, and the authentication page sends new users to a sales call for access (0). 0+20+0+0 = 20. Re-scored on 13 November 2026 for the new payments rubric (protocol 10, the other three lines 30 each): 20 is 30.

### Transparency & trust: Prism Inference +11

- Tencent Hy4 (52): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Closed service under the TokenHub terms, but Tencent's release headline calls Hy4 open source while the weights and system card are only promised 'in the coming days', with no licence stated, and tencent/Hy4 didn't answer on Hugging Face on 11 November (14 of 30). Terms and FAQ agree inputs aren't used for training; the privacy policy renders only with JavaScript and wasn't read (15 of 30). Dated retirement notices and shutdown fields (13 of 20). Processing generally in mainland China for the China site, Singapore for the international one (13 of 20). Every benchmark in the release is Tencent's own or a partner's. 14 + 15 + 13 + 13 = 55.
- Prism Inference (63): Closed service with clear terms that name Prism Technologies Inc (15). The privacy policy, the terms and the zero-retention page agree on what is and isn't kept. Service metadata is kept 'only for as long as reasonably needed' with no period, and no DPA is published (20 of 30). No deprecation policy or dated notices, only the terms' advance notice 'when reasonably practicable' (3 of 20). The privacy policy says Prism is based in the United States and names vendors by category only, with no sub-processor list or regions (5 of 20). 15+20+3+5 = 43.

### Schema & documentation: Prism Inference +9

- Tencent Hy4 (73): Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No OpenAPI file for inference; field pages for the OpenAI and Anthropic formats as TokenHub implements them (12 of 25). llms.txt with Markdown copies (10). The model list, updated 9 November, gives hy4's context, input and output limits and marks thinking, structured output, function calling, caching and image understanding; computer use, which Tencent's release names, isn't marked (13 of 20). Typed field pages (10 of 15). Examples in five languages and an error page of 30 codes (14 of 15). Dated release notes, with hy4 added on 4 November (14 of 15). 12 + 10 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 14 = 73.
- Prism Inference (82): A public OpenAPI 3.1 file covering ten paths, including chat completions, responses, messages and models (25). llms.txt on both the site and the docs, a fuller llms-full.txt, and every docs page served as Markdown (10). Reference pages state what each endpoint is for and what isn't supported, such as stored responses and hosted tools, and the models page has a 'use when' column (15 of 20). `model` and `messages` are required, with ranges on `temperature` and `top_p` and an enum for reasoning effort, but `tool_choice` is untyped and `response_format` and the request body allow any extra properties (10 of 15). Examples in curl, TypeScript and Python, and an errors page with 13 status codes and five named codes with fixes (14 of 15). Paths are versioned under /v1 and the changelog is dated, with a single entry on 6 October 2026, still the only one on 4 November (8 of 15). 25+10+15+10+14+8 = 82.

## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Tencent Hy4 | Prism Inference | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 46 | 65 | Prism Inference +19 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 73 | 82 | Prism Inference +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 86 | 68 | Tencent Hy4 +18 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 71 | 68 | Tencent Hy4 +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 45 | 30 | Tencent Hy4 +15 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 73 | 49 | Tencent Hy4 +24 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 52 | 63 | Prism Inference +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| **Total** | | **64 · B** | **60.8 · C** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Tencent Hy4 | Prism Inference |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Prism Technologies Inc |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.prisminference.com/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Hosted model under the Tencent Cloud TokenHub terms. Tencent says weights and a system card will follow; no licence is stated yet | Proprietary service under Prism's terms of service. The OpenAPI file declares `LicenseRef-Proprietary`. The Hermes provider plugin repository carries no licence file |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-09-09 |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-09-09 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (4) |

## How the scores have moved

### Tencent Hy4

- +1.8 on 13 November 2026: checklist

### Prism Inference

- +1.2 on 13 November 2026: checklist
- -0.7 on 4 November 2026: security, product
- +0.2 on 27 October 2026: checklist

## Verdicts

**Tencent Hy4.** Tencent's flagship model is on TokenHub as hy4, with a 1M-token context, image understanding, function calling and caching, at ¥6 input and ¥18 output per million tokens, half price until the end of 2026. The weights it is called open source for aren't published yet, and every benchmark is Tencent's own.

**Prism Inference.** Three wire formats, a public OpenAPI 3.1 file, per-token prices without a login and zero data retention by default on every tier. The service launched on 24 September 2026 with two models, one by request. Agent self-signup has closed and new access goes through a sales call, and no rate-limit numbers, SLA document or deprecation policy was found.

## Before you call either

### Tencent Hy4

1. Use model id hy4 on TokenHub's OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoints; hy4-preview is a separate, older model
2. Keep input under 960K tokens and expect at most 64K output
3. Reuse prompt prefixes: cached input is ¥0.3 against ¥6
4. Check the price page for the end of the 50% discount on 31 December 2026 before budgeting
5. Read rate limits from the console or DescribeModelQuota; the public docs don't give them for chat models

### Prism Inference

1. Call `GET https://api.prisminference.com/v1/models` at start-up, with no key per the docs, and use only ids it returns. Expect 403 on `gemma-4-31b` without organisation access
2. Use base URL `https://api.prisminference.com/v1` for OpenAI clients and `https://api.prisminference.com` with no `/v1` for Anthropic clients
3. Read `error.retryable` before retrying, and wait for `Retry-After` on 429, which covers both key limits and model capacity
4. Send `reasoning_effort: "none"` or `low` when latency matters. Reasoning is on by default and its tokens are billed as output
5. Keep conversation state yourself and send `store: false` on Responses. `previous_response_id`, stored responses and hosted tools aren't supported
6. Ask the workspace owner for `PRISM_API_KEY`. The agent sign-up endpoints now return `403 signup_disabled`

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, Tencent Hy4 or Prism Inference?

Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Prism Inference's 60.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Prism Inference leads on reliability, schema & documentation and transparency & trust.

### Do Tencent Hy4 and Prism Inference need an API key?

Both need an API key.

### Can an agent call Tencent Hy4 and Prism Inference without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for Tencent Hy4. Prism Inference has a hosted endpoint at https://api.prisminference.com/v1.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-prism-inference.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-prism-inference.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "hy4", "b": "prism-inference"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare hy4 prism-inference`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hy4.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/prism-inference.json

## Other comparisons with Tencent Hy4 or Prism Inference

- [Amazon Bedrock vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-hy4.md)
- [Amazon Bedrock vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-bedrock-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Claude API vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-hy4.md)
- [Claude API vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Antseed vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-hy4.md)
- [Antseed vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-hy4.md)
- [Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-openai-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [BlockRun.AI vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-hy4.md)
- [BlockRun.AI vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Cerebras Inference vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-hy4.md)
- [Cerebras Inference vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Claude Fable 5.2 vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-hy4.md)
- [Claude Fable 5.2 vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-hy4.md)
- [Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-mythos-5-2-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-hy4.md)
- [Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Cloudflare Workers AI vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-hy4.md)
- [Cloudflare Workers AI vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-hy4.md)
- [Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [DeepInfra vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-hy4.md)
- [DeepInfra vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [DeepSeek API vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-hy4.md)
- [DeepSeek API vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Eden AI vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-hy4.md)
- [Eden AI vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Glimpse vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-hy4.md)
- [Glimpse vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Fireworks AI Inference vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-hy4.md)
- [Fireworks AI Inference vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-hy4.md)
- [Gemini 4 Carbon vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-hy4.md)
- [Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-4-hydrogen-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Gemini Developer API vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-hy4.md)
- [Gemini Developer API vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [GroqCloud vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-hy4.md)
- [GroqCloud vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Tencent Hy4](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hugging-face-inference-providers-vs-hy4.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Jais 3](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-jais-3.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Meta Model API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-meta-model-api.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs MiniMax API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-minimax-api.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Mistral AI API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-mistral-api.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Ember](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-ember.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Spark Open](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-spark-open.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Novita AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-novita-ai.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs OpenAI API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-openai-api.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs OpenRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-openrouter.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Router.com (Ramp Router)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-ramp-router.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-reflection-beam.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs RouterPlus](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-routerplus.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs SambaCloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-sambanova.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs SiliconFlow](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-siliconflow.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Simplismart](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-simplismart.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs StepFun API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-stepfun-api.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-swe-2-flash.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-tencent-tokenhub.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Together AI Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-together-inference.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Vercel AI Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-vertex-ai.md)
- [Tencent Hy4 vs xAI API (Grok)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-xai-api.md)
- [Jais 3 vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jais-3-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Meta Model API vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/meta-model-api-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [MiniMax API vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-api-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Mistral AI API vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-api-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Muse Ember vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-ember-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Muse Spark Open vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-spark-open-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Novita AI vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/novita-ai-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [OpenAI API vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-api-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [OpenRouter vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openrouter-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Prism Inference vs Router.com (Ramp Router)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-ramp-router.md)
- [Prism Inference vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-reflection-beam.md)
- [Prism Inference vs RouterPlus](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-routerplus.md)
- [Prism Inference vs SiliconFlow](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-siliconflow.md)
- [Prism Inference vs Simplismart](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-simplismart.md)
- [Prism Inference vs StepFun API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-stepfun-api.md)
- [Prism Inference vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-swe-2-flash.md)
- [Prism Inference vs Together AI Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-together-inference.md)
- [Prism Inference vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-vertex-ai.md)
- [Prism Inference vs xAI API (Grok)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-xai-api.md)
- [Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hugging-face-inference-providers-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl-vs-prism-inference.md)
- [Prism Inference vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-tencent-tokenhub.md)
- [Prism Inference vs SambaCloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-sambanova.md)
- [Prism Inference vs Vercel AI Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.md)

---

Query this catalogue directly over MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (Streamable HTTP, no key). How: https://www.anchorterminal.com/agents/#mcp