# Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Ember (slim)

> Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) to Muse Ember's 53.1 (D) for llm inference. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-ember.md (~6,150 tokens) · this version ~930 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-ember.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy4-vs-muse-ember
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-13
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Muse Ember's 53.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do llm inference.

- Tencent Hy4: B 64, rank #595 of 1524 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy4.min.md
- Muse Ember: D 53.1, rank #1034 of 1524 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/muse-ember.min.md
- Tencent Hy4, good for Long-context agent work, coding and office or finance tasks on a 1M-token context with images, for teams already on Tencent Cloud or happy to verify an account there. Ahead on Reliability, 46 against 40; Schema & documentation, 73 against 60; Agent ergonomics, 86 against 72; Security & auth, 71 against 64; Payments & pricing, 45 against 30; Maintenance & community, 73 against 46.
- Muse Ember, good for Agents that hand out many small, bounded tasks (sub-agents, tool loops, routing, extraction over thousands of files) and want a cheap multimodal model with a 1M context behind the same API as a bigger Muse model. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.

| Category | Tencent Hy4 | Muse Ember |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 46 | 40 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 73 | 60 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 86 | 72 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 71 | 64 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 45 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 73 | 46 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 52 | 53 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Tencent Hy4 | Muse Ember |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.meta.ai/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP |  |
| Licence | Hosted model under the Tencent Cloud TokenHub terms. Tencent says weights and a system card will follow; no licence is stated yet | Closed model, used through Meta Model API and Muse Code under the Meta Model API Terms of Service (last updated 9 October 2026). No open weights; Meta's open-weight models are Muse Spark Open and Muse Glimmer |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-09 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-10-02 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |

Why the edge:
- Maintenance & community, Tencent Hy4 +27: Tencent Hy4 73 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.); Muse Ember 46 (Model reading.)
- Payments & pricing, Tencent Hy4 +15: Tencent Hy4 45 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.); Muse Ember 30 (Published rubric.)
- Agent ergonomics, Tencent Hy4 +14: Tencent Hy4 86 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.); Muse Ember 72 (Model reading.)
- Schema & documentation, Tencent Hy4 +13: Tencent Hy4 73 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.); Muse Ember 60 (Model reading.)
- Security & auth, Tencent Hy4 +7: Tencent Hy4 71 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.); Muse Ember 64 (Platform readings are the meta-model-api listing's of 4 November.)
- Reliability, Tencent Hy4 +6: Tencent Hy4 46 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.); Muse Ember 40 (Model reading, for the surface it's called on, Meta Model API.)