# Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B (slim)

> Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) to SmolLM3-3B's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-smollm3-3b.md (~5,600 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-smollm3-3b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-smollm3-3b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against SmolLM3-3B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. SmolLM3-3B leads on reach, risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- SmolLM3-3B: C 61, rank #47 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/smollm3-3b.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0
- SmolLM3-3B, good for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device Ahead on Reach, 85 against 70; Risk, 65 against 60; Agent interface, 80 against 75. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.8 out of 5.

| Category | Hy3 | SmolLM3-3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 65 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 80 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 54 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | SmolLM3-3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Hugging Face |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2025-09-10 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |