# Hy3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 (slim)

> Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) to Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.md (~6,050 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2: C 61, rank #46 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwopus3-8-27b-flash-v2.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Risk, 60 against 50; Agent interface, 75 against 60.
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2, good for Hobbyist and research agents that want a faster-finishing Qwen3.8-27B for local coding loops on a 24 GB GPU. Ahead on Reach, 85 against 70.

| Category | Hy3 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 50 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 56 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Jackrong |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (metadata only, no LICENSE file); built on Qwen3.8-27B under Apache 2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-09-21 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |