# Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct (slim)

> Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) to Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-vl-2b-instruct.md (~5,950 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-vl-2b-instruct.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-vl-2b-instruct
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct: C 61, rank #45 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-vl-2b-instruct.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Risk, 60 against 55; Agent interface, 75 against 60; Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 31.
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct, good for An agent on a laptop or small edge device that needs a local model to read images, documents and video in about 2 GB Ahead on Reach, 95 against 70.

| Category | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 31 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2025-11-01 |