# Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (slim)

> Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Hy3 score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 63.2 and 62.6 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b.md (~5,800 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Hy3 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 63.2 (B) and 62.6 (B). Hy3 leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: B 63.2, rank #25 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-6-35b-a3b.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Risk, 60 against 55; Agent interface, 75 against 70; Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 36.
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, good for Agents with a 32 GB or larger machine that want a quick, permissively licensed coding and tool-calling cousin with vision. Ahead on Reach, 85 against 70.

| Category | Hy3 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 57 | 58 |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 36 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-04-16 |