# Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (slim)

> Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores 64.6 (B) to Hy3's 62.6 (B) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b.md (~5,900 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-397b-a17b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Hy3's 62.6 (B), and leads in 1 of 5 scored categories. Hy3 leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B: B 64.6, rank #18 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-397b-a17b.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Risk, 60 against 55; Agent interface, 75 against 70; Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 39.
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B, good for Agents with access to an 8-GPU server, or calling a hosted endpoint, that want the strongest open Qwen3.5 with vision and a plain licence. Ahead on Capability, 72 against 57.

| Category | Hy3 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 57 | 72 |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 70 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 39 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-02-16 |