# Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (slim)

> Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores 63.6 (B) to Hy3's 62.6 (B) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-122b-a10b.md (~5,950 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-122b-a10b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-5-122b-a10b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Hy3's 62.6 (B), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Hy3 leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: B 63.6, rank #22 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-5-122b-a10b.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Risk, 60 against 55; Agent interface, 75 against 70; Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 39.
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B, good for Agents with a 128 GB unified-memory machine or two large GPUs that want a capable vision-language model with a plain licence. Ahead on Capability, 62 against 57; Reach, 80 against 70.

| Category | Hy3 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 57 | 62 |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 80 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 39 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-02-24 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |