# Hy3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 (slim)

> Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) to Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507's 55.7 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-4b-instruct-2507.md (~6,050 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-4b-instruct-2507.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-qwen3-4b-instruct-2507
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507's 55.7 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507: C 55.7, rank #77 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/qwen3-4b-instruct-2507.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Capability, 57 against 31; Risk, 60 against 55; Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 26.
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507, good for Agents that want a capable small instruct model on a laptop, phone-class device or spare GPU, with a plain licence and long context. Ahead on Reach, 95 against 70.

| Category | Hy3 | Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 57 | 31 |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 75 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 26 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2025-09-17 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |