# Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B (slim)

> Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) to Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-nemotron-3-nano-4b.md (~5,950 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-nemotron-3-nano-4b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-nemotron-3-nano-4b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3 Nano 4B leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B: C 56.8, rank #73 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nemotron-3-nano-4b.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Capability, 57 against 25; Agent interface, 75 against 70.
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B, good for Agents on laptops, edge boards and small GPUs that need a cheap local tool-calling helper in English Ahead on Reach, 90 against 70; Risk, 65 against 60. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.8 out of 5.

| Category | Hy3 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 57 | 25 |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 65 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 55 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | NVIDIA |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-03-16 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |