# Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B (slim)

> Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) to MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.md (~9,250 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #28 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B: C 61, rank #77 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Risk, 60 against 55; Agent interface, 75 against 70.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B, good for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence Ahead on Reach, 90 against 70; Documentation and upkeep, 68 against 56.

| Category | Hy3 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | OpenBMB |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-11-03 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +20: Hy3 70 (Memory earns 5, because the smallest build of 4-bit precision or better is AngelSlim's GPTQ-Int4 of 168.5 GB, about 202 GB with the fifth added, which is within…); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90 (Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGU…)
- Documentation and upkeep, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +12: Hy3 56 (The model card earns 11, covering intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 68 (Model card 8, it covers intended use, architecture and parameters but not limitations, context length, languages or a knowledge cut-off.)
- Risk, Hy3 +5: Hy3 60 (File safety earns the full 25, safetensors only with no pickle files, and the documented route runs vLLM or SGLang from their own code with a Jinja template, so…); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed.)
- Agent interface, Hy3 +5: Hy3 75 (The chat template earns 20, a chat_template.jinja in the repository.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 70 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.)