# Hy3 vs Inkling-Small (slim)

> Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) to Hy3's 62.6 (B) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-inkling-small.md (~5,800 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-inkling-small.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-inkling-small
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Hy3's 62.6 (B), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Hy3 leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- Inkling-Small: B 66.5, rank #14 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/inkling-small.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Reach, 70 against 55.
- Inkling-Small, good for Teams with 256 GB or more of datacentre GPU memory who want an open multimodal agent model with audio input and adjustable thinking. Ahead on Capability, 63 against 57; Risk, 70 against 60; Agent interface, 85 against 75; Documentation and upkeep, 82 against 56. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5.

| Category | Hy3 | Inkling-Small |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 57 | 63 |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 55 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 70 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 82 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | Inkling-Small |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-07-31 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |