# Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash (slim)

> Hy-Memory-30B-A3B scores 61 (C) to MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 54.3 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy-memory-30b-a3b-vs-minimax-m3-1-flash.md (~9,500 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy-memory-30b-a3b-vs-minimax-m3-1-flash.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy-memory-30b-a3b-vs-minimax-m3-1-flash
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Hy-Memory-30B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 54.3 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. MiniMax-M3.1-Flash leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B: C 61, rank #62 of 135 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy-memory-30b-a3b.min.md
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash: C 54.3, rank #112 of 135 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minimax-m3-1-flash.min.md
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B, good for Agents with an external memory framework that want a local model for the write path on a 24 GB card Ahead on Reach, 85 against 55; Risk, 60 against 35; Documentation and upkeep, 68 against 41.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash, good for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open multimodal agent and coding model with 1M tokens of context and can meet the licence's attribution and notice terms. Ahead on Agent interface, 70 against 65.

| Category | Hy-Memory-30B-A3B | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 85 | 55 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 35 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 65 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 68 | 41 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy-Memory-30B-A3B | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | MiniMax |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MiniMax Community License (custom; commercial use needs a "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" line and a one-time notice to MiniMax, and MiniMax's written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue) |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | 2026-10-23 |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.3/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Reach, Hy-Memory-30B-A3B +30: Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 85 (Memory 25, Tencent's own Q4_K_M GGUF is 18.24 GB, and 18.24 GB × 1.2 = 21.9 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB.); MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 55 (Memory earns nothing.)
- Documentation and upkeep, Hy-Memory-30B-A3B +27: Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 68 (Model card 8, Intended use (the write path of Mem0, MemOS and Hy-Memory), parameters (30B, about 3B active) and languages (English and Chinese, in the metadata)…); MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 41 (The model card earns 11, missing limitations, languages and a knowledge cut-off.)
- Risk, Hy-Memory-30B-A3B +25: Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 60 (File safety 25, 51 safetensors shards and no pickle or Python files.); MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 35 (File safety earns 15, safetensors only, less 10 because the SGLang route the card links passes trust_remote_code for the repository's configuration and processo…)
- Agent interface, MiniMax-M3.1-Flash +5: Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 65 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository.); MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 70 (The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository.)