# Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B (slim)

> Hy-Memory-30B-A3B and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy-memory-30b-a3b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.md (~10,150 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy-memory-30b-a3b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy-memory-30b-a3b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Hy-Memory-30B-A3B and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B: C 61, rank #68 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy-memory-30b-a3b.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B: C 61, rank #76 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.min.md
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B, good for Agents with an external memory framework that want a local model for the write path on a 24 GB card Ahead on Risk, 60 against 55; Documentation and upkeep, 68 against 48.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B, good for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model Ahead on Reach, 95 against 85; Agent interface, 70 against 65.

| Category | Hy-Memory-30B-A3B | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 85 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 65 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 68 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy-Memory-30B-A3B | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | OpenBMB |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | 2026-10-30 |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, Hy-Memory-30B-A3B +20: Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 68 (Model card 8, Intended use (the write path of Mem0, MemOS and Hy-Memory), parameters (30B, about 3B active) and languages (English and Chinese, in the metadata)…); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48 (Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and p…)
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10: Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 85 (Memory 25, Tencent's own Q4_K_M GGUF is 18.24 GB, and 18.24 GB × 1.2 = 21.9 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95 (Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare.)
- Risk, Hy-Memory-30B-A3B +5: Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 60 (File safety 25, 51 safetensors shards and no pickle or Python files.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main r…)
- Agent interface, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +5: Hy-Memory-30B-A3B 65 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters.)