# Hunter API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP (slim)

> Lusha API + MCP has a score of 62.6 (B) against Hunter API + MCP's 56.8 (C). Both do email finder. The largest gap is security & auth, 26 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hunter-vs-lusha.md (~1,500 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hunter-vs-lusha.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hunter-vs-lusha
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Lusha API + MCP has a score of 62.6 (B) against Hunter API + MCP's 56.8 (C). Both do email finder. The largest gap is security & auth, 26 points.

- Hunter API + MCP: C 56.8, rank #299 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hunter.min.md
- Lusha API + MCP: B 62.6, rank #215 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lusha.min.md
- Pick Hunter API + MCP for schema & documentation (+7). Pick Lusha API + MCP for reliability (+25), security & auth (+26), maintenance & community (+19).

| Category | Hunter API + MCP | Lusha API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 50 | 75 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 90 | 83 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 54 | 51 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 33 | 59 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 63 | 82 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 81 | 84 |