{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "htx", "name": "HTX trading API", "vendor": "HTX", "vendorUrl": "https://www.htx.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "HTX, the exchange formerly Huobi, runs REST and WebSocket APIs for spot and derivatives trading, balances, transfers and withdrawals, authenticated with HMAC-signed API keys that carry read, trade and withdraw permissions.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/htx", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/htx.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/htx.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/htx.json", "dns": "htx.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/HuobiRDCenter", "transports": [], "packages": [], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API keys made in the account's API Management page after a browser sign-up and identity check. Requests are signed with HMAC SHA256 (SignatureVersion 2) over the query string, with AccessKeyId, Timestamp and the Signature sent as query parameters; the secret never travels. A main account key carries Read, Trade and Withdraw permissions, a sub-user key Read and Trade only. A key can be bound to up to 20 IP addresses, and the docs say a key without IP binding expires after 90 days (https://huobiapi.github.io/docs/spot/v1/en/, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Trading fees per order. The fee schedule at htx.com/fee is drawn by script and answered our reader with no text, so no rate is recorded; third-party guides give 0.2 per cent maker and taker at the base tier, which is a lead and not a source. Public market data needs no key and no account (https://www.htx.com/fee/, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs or on the pages that loaded (checked 2026-11-03). Trading fees are taken from each fill.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 0, "popularity": { "githubStars": 684, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://huobiapi.github.io/docs/spot/v1/en/", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "api-key", "closed-source", "usage-priced", "python", "java", "go", "no-status-page" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-21", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 43.3, "grade": "E", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1166, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 21, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 69, "maintenance": 57, "payments": 15, "reliability": 38, "schema": 40, "security": 51, "transparency": 25 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "HTX's API has per-endpoint rate limits, read, trade and withdraw key permissions with IP binding, and SDKs in five languages. No official MCP server exists, the testnet is closed, the public reference is still Huobi's with a 2022 changelog, and the fee schedule, terms and restricted countries are on script-drawn pages we couldn't read.", "bestFor": "Spot and USDT-margined derivatives for agents that can hold an HTX key, with no MCP server and no testnet.", "strengths": [ "Key permissions split into Read, Trade and Withdraw, sub-user keys without Withdraw, and up to 20 bound IP addresses per key", "Rate limits published per endpoint with numbers, and remaining-quota headers on every response", "A client-order-id unique within 8 hours on orders and idempotent on withdrawals, so a retry doesn't double an order", "Official SDKs in Python, Java, C++, C# and Go, the contract ones pushed on 21 October 2026" ], "weaknesses": [ "No official MCP server; the only one in the MCP registry is a third party's read-only ticker server", "The testnet is shut down, so order logic can only be tried with real funds", "The public API reference is still branded Huobi with a last changelog entry of June 2022, and HTX's newer docs are drawn by script", "No status page, no SLA and no documented 429 or Retry-After behaviour", "The fee schedule, user agreement, privacy policy and restricted-country list couldn't be read, so none is recorded first-hand" ], "agentNotes": [ "Ask the operator for a key with Read and Trade only and bound to your IP addresses; a key without IP binding expires after 90 days", "Send a fresh client-order-id of up to 64 characters with every order and reuse it only on retry; a repeat within 8 hours answers invalid.client.order.id", "Watch X-HB-RateLimit-Requests-Remain and pace at under 100 order calls per 2 seconds per UID; limits are shared by every key on the account", "There is no testnet; try order logic with the smallest size the market allows", "Confirm the person's country is served before trading; the restricted list in the user agreement couldn't be read here" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "E", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 43.3 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 69, "maintenance": 57, "payments": 15, "reliability": 38, "schema": 40, "security": 51, "transparency": 15 }, "provenanceScore": 34, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "http": "curl https://api.huobi.pro/market/tickers" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/htx" }, "area": "payments", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "htx.com", "domainRegistered": "1995-12-13", "endpointOnVendorDomain": false, "terms": "https://www.htx.com/en-in/support/360000298561/", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://huobiapi.github.io/docs/spot/v1/en/", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "The legal entity is unread. The HTX Platform User Agreement and every other page on www.htx.com answered our reader with no text on 3 November 2026 (the pages are drawn by script), so the terms, privacy policy, fee schedule and about page were not read. Terms URL recorded from a search result's title.", "RDAP gives htx.com a registration date of 13 December 1995, long before the exchange took the name in 2023; the domain was acquired, not registered, by the exchange.", "The API endpoint api.huobi.pro is on the old huobi.pro domain, not htx.com.", "www.htx.com/robots.txt allows / and disallows account paths (finance/account, user-center/security and the like). www.huobi.com/robots.txt disallows everything and was not read further. huobiapi.github.io has no robots.txt.", "https://www.htx.com/.well-known/security.txt answered no text; recorded as none. status.htx.com does not resolve." ], "score": 34 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/htx.json", "live": { "slug": "htx", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://htx.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:20.226147452Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:20.226147452Z" } }, "answer": "Hyperliquid scores 50 (D) on agent readiness against HTX trading API's 43.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. HTX trading API leads on maintenance \u0026 community.", "b": { "slug": "hyperliquid", "name": "Hyperliquid", "vendor": "Hyperliquid Labs", "vendorUrl": "https://hyperliquid.xyz", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Hyperliquid is a perpetuals and spot exchange whose order book runs on its own chain. Agents trade through the REST info and exchange endpoints and WebSocket at api.hyperliquid.xyz, signing with a wallet key or an approved API wallet.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json", "dns": "hyperliquid.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/hyperliquid-python-sdk", "license": "The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "hyperliquid-python-sdk" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "No API keys. Every exchange action is a signed message from an EVM wallet; info requests need no signature. A master account approves API wallets (agent wallets) with `approveAgent`, optionally named and with an expiry, which can only sign on its behalf and cannot query data. L1 actions (orders, cancels, margin settings) and user-signed actions (USDC and spot sends, withdrawals, approvals) use two different EIP-712 schemes, and the docs recommend an SDK for signing. Nonces are per signer, must sit within two days behind and one day ahead of block time, and sub-accounts signed by one API wallet share its nonce set (https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api/nonces-and-api-wallets.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API has no charge. Base-tier fees are 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker on perpetuals and 0.070% taker and 0.040% maker on spot, assessed on rolling 14-day volume, falling to 0.024% taker and 0% maker above $7 billion, with maker rebates to -0.003% for large maker share and staking discounts of 5% to 40%. Withdrawals to the bridge cost $1; an activation gas fee applies to a first order. `reserveRequestWeight` buys extra rate limit at 0.0005 USDC a request (https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/trading/fees.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.04% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs (checked 2026-11-03). Accounts are funded by depositing USDC on Arbitrum or other bridged chains; several third-party MCP servers in the registry sell Hyperliquid data by x402, none of them Hyperliquid's.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 0, "popularity": { "githubStars": 1873, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": 167497, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api", "llmsTxt": "https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.market-data", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto", "wallet.onchain" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "closed-source", "llms-txt", "python", "rust", "sandbox", "usage-priced", "no-key", "no-status-page", "bug-bounty", "rest" ], "lastRelease": "2026-06-04", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1018, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 19, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 39, "payments": 55, "reliability": 40, "schema": 42, "security": 64, "transparency": 26 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.", "bestFor": "An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.", "strengths": [ "API wallets approved by the master account can only sign trading actions; withdrawals and external transfers need the user's own key", "Numeric rate limits per IP and per address, with weights per request type and a paid `reserveRequestWeight` top-up", "Fees published per tier from 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker on perpetuals, with maker rebates and staking discounts", "A testnet at api.hyperliquid-testnet.xyz with the same API and a faucet of 1,000 mock USDC for addresses that have deposited on mainnet", "Client order IDs (`cloid`), `expiresAfter`, `noop` and a `scheduleCancel` dead man's switch for safe retries" ], "weaknesses": [ "No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402", "No OpenAPI file, no changelog, no API versioning and no status page found", "The terms of use and privacy policy at app.hyperliquid.xyz draw by script and hyperliquid.xyz/terms answered 403, so the restricted jurisdictions are unchecked", "Order errors are message strings without codes, and the docs give no 429 or Retry-After guidance beyond one request every 10 seconds when limited", "The official Python SDK is marked Alpha, last released 4 June 2026, with 112 open issues" ], "agentNotes": [ "Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with `approveAgent` with a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address", "Use the Python SDK's `sign_l1_action` and `sign_user_signed_action`; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives \"User or API Wallet ... does not exist\"", "Set a `cloid` on every order and read the per-order `statuses` array; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch", "Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data", "Arm `scheduleCancel` before unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 39, "payments": 55, "reliability": 40, "schema": 42, "security": 64, "transparency": 20 }, "provenanceScore": 32, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "pip install hyperliquid-python-sdk", "http": "curl -X POST https://api.hyperliquid.xyz/info -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{\"type\":\"l2Book\",\"coin\":\"BTC\"}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.derivatives", "tool": "https://letme.dev/hyperliquid" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Perpetuals taker fee, tier 0", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.045, "note": "0.045% of notional; maker 0.015%" }, { "item": "Spot taker fee, tier 0", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.07, "note": "0.070% of notional; maker 0.040%" }, { "item": "Bridge withdrawal", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1, "note": "$1 per withdrawal to the bridge contract" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "hyperliquid.xyz", "domainRegistered": "2022-10-15", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/terms", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "No legal entity found on a readable page. The docs name Hyperliquid Labs (self-funded) and the Hyper Foundation (bug bounty); app.hyperliquid.xyz/terms and hyperfoundation.org draw by script and hyperliquid.xyz/terms answered 403.", "RDAP gives hyperliquid.xyz a registration date of 15 October 2022, registrar Squarespace Domains.", "No status page found; status.hyperliquid.xyz did not resolve and the docs link none. No changelog; the docs have no dated release notes.", "https://hyperliquid.xyz/.well-known/security.txt answered 403, so security.txt is unknown. The docs' bug bounty page gives bugbounty@hyperfoundation.org.", "hyperliquid.gitbook.io/robots.txt allows everything with Content-Signal ai-input=yes; hyperliquid.xyz/robots.txt allows everything." ], "score": 32 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.json", "live": { "slug": "hyperliquid", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://hyperliquid.xyz/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "unknown", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:05.956872316Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:05.956872316Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 40, "category": "payments", "leads": "hyperliquid", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule at htx.com/fee is drawn by script and answered no text, so no price is recorded first-hand (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data needs no key, card or account; trading needs a verified and funded account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up in a browser and pass identity checks (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55." }, "scores": { "a": 15, "b": 55 } }, { "by": 18, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "htx", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a closed service. The readable changelog ends on 24 June 2022, but the official contract SDKs were pushed on 21 October 2026 and the spot SDKs in April and July 2026, so the API surface is still being maintained; judgement call (20 of 30). SDK pushes on 30 July, 23 August and 21 October 2026 are commits, not releases (10 of 20). A Telegram group for API support and a support centre, neither tested; GitHub issues not read (8 of 15). Official SDKs in five languages (15). No CI seen, dependencies not checked (4 of 10). 20 + 10 + 8 + 15 + 4 = 57.", "b": "Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39." }, "scores": { "a": 57, "b": 39 } }, { "by": 13, "category": "security", "leads": "hyperliquid", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reasons": { "a": "HMAC-signed keys with Read, Trade and Withdraw permissions, sub-user keys without Withdraw, up to 20 bound IPs, revocation in the account and a 90-day expiry without IP binding. The AccessKeyId and the HMAC signature travel as query parameters; the secret does not, so no deduction for a secret in the URL (24 of 30). Read-only keys and withdraw-free keys exist; no server-side confirmation for orders or withdrawals (14 of 20). The API returns the exchange's own data, no untrusted content (10). No per-call log or key-use history found for the operator (3 of 15). No security.txt, disclosure policy or certification found on the pages that loaded (0 of 20). 24 + 14 + 10 + 3 + 0 = 51.", "b": "No shared secrets. Actions are signed by the wallet key or by an API wallet the master approves with a name and optional expiry; API wallets can only sign, withdrawals and external sends are user-signed, and approving a new wallet deregisters the old. No IP allow-list or address allow-list (24 of 30). An API wallet is a trading-only credential and info needs no key, but nothing limits order size or marks an action as needing approval (10 of 20). The API returns no untrusted content (10). Fills, historical orders, `userRole` and nonces are queryable per account; no per-wallet action log (8 of 15). A bug bounty run by the Hyper Foundation with rewards up to under 1 million USDC, a Zellic audit of the bridge contract, a SECURITY.md on the SDK; no security.txt (403), no SOC 2 (12 of 20). Total 64." }, "scores": { "a": 51, "b": 64 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "HTX", "b": "Hyperliquid Labs", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "none", "b": "The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "0", "b": "0", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-21", "b": "2026-06-04", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no date given", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "684 stars", "b": "1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Hyperliquid scores 50 (D) on agent readiness against HTX trading API's 43.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. HTX trading API leads on maintenance \u0026 community.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, HTX trading API or Hyperliquid?" }, { "answer": "HTX trading API needs an API key. Hyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.", "question": "Do HTX trading API and Hyperliquid need an API key?" }, { "answer": "No hosted endpoint is listed for HTX trading API. No hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid.", "question": "Can an agent call HTX trading API and Hyperliquid without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Maintenance \u0026 community, 57 against 39" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "Spot and USDT-margined derivatives for agents that can hold an HTX key, with no MCP server and no testnet.", "slug": "htx", "watchFor": "No official MCP server; the only one in the MCP registry is a third party's read-only ticker server" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Security \u0026 auth, 64 against 51", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 15" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.", "slug": "hyperliquid", "watchFor": "No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.market-data", "name": "Exchange market data" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bitget vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitget vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bybit vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bybit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-htx.json", "title": "Crypto.com Exchange API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-htx.json", "title": "Gate vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Gate vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-htx.json", "title": "Gemini Exchange API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-kraken.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-mexc.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-okx.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-upbit.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-htx.json", "title": "Binance API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Binance API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-htx.json", "title": "Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-htx.json", "title": "Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-htx.json", "title": "Deribit vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Deribit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-htx.json", "title": "dYdX vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "dYdX vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "by": 2, "edge": "hyperliquid", "htx": 38, "hyperliquid": 40, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 2, "edge": "hyperliquid", "htx": 40, "hyperliquid": 42, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "by": 1, "edge": "hyperliquid", "htx": 69, "hyperliquid": 70, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "by": 13, "edge": "hyperliquid", "htx": 51, "hyperliquid": 64, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "by": 40, "edge": "hyperliquid", "htx": 15, "hyperliquid": 55, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 18, "edge": "htx", "htx": 57, "hyperliquid": 39, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "by": 1, "edge": "hyperliquid", "htx": 25, "hyperliquid": 26, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Hyperliquid scores 50 (D) on agent readiness against HTX trading API's 43.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. HTX trading API leads on maintenance \u0026 community. Both do exchange market data.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "htx": "HTX's API has per-endpoint rate limits, read, trade and withdraw key permissions with IP binding, and SDKs in five languages. No official MCP server exists, the testnet is closed, the public reference is still Huobi's with a 2022 changelog, and the fee schedule, terms and restricted countries are on script-drawn pages we couldn't read.", "hyperliquid": "Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.min.md" }, "markdown": "Hyperliquid scores 50 (D) on agent readiness against HTX trading API's 43.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. HTX trading API leads on maintenance \u0026 community. Both do exchange market data.\n\n- HTX trading API: grade E, 43.3/100, rank #1166 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/htx.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/htx.json\n- Hyperliquid: grade D, 50/100, rank #1018 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### HTX trading API (E)\n\nGood for: Spot and USDT-margined derivatives for agents that can hold an HTX key, with no MCP server and no testnet.\n\nAhead on:\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 57 against 39\n\nWatch for: No official MCP server; the only one in the MCP registry is a third party's read-only ticker server\n\n### Hyperliquid (D)\n\nGood for: An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.\n\nAhead on:\n- Security \u0026 auth, 64 against 51\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 15\n\nWatch for: No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Hyperliquid +40\n\n- HTX trading API (15): No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule at htx.com/fee is drawn by script and answered no text, so no price is recorded first-hand (0 of 20, unchecked). Public market data needs no key, card or account; trading needs a verified and funded account. Judgement call (15 of 20). A person must sign up in a browser and pass identity checks (0). 0 + 0 + 15 + 0 = 15.\n- Hyperliquid (55): No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: HTX trading API +18\n\n- HTX trading API (57): Read as a closed service. The readable changelog ends on 24 June 2022, but the official contract SDKs were pushed on 21 October 2026 and the spot SDKs in April and July 2026, so the API surface is still being maintained; judgement call (20 of 30). SDK pushes on 30 July, 23 August and 21 October 2026 are commits, not releases (10 of 20). A Telegram group for API support and a support centre, neither tested; GitHub issues not read (8 of 15). Official SDKs in five languages (15). No CI seen, dependencies not checked (4 of 10). 20 + 10 + 8 + 15 + 4 = 57.\n- Hyperliquid (39): Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39.\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: Hyperliquid +13\n\n- HTX trading API (51): HMAC-signed keys with Read, Trade and Withdraw permissions, sub-user keys without Withdraw, up to 20 bound IPs, revocation in the account and a 90-day expiry without IP binding. The AccessKeyId and the HMAC signature travel as query parameters; the secret does not, so no deduction for a secret in the URL (24 of 30). Read-only keys and withdraw-free keys exist; no server-side confirmation for orders or withdrawals (14 of 20). The API returns the exchange's own data, no untrusted content (10). No per-call log or key-use history found for the operator (3 of 15). No security.txt, disclosure policy or certification found on the pages that loaded (0 of 20). 24 + 14 + 10 + 3 + 0 = 51.\n- Hyperliquid (64): No shared secrets. Actions are signed by the wallet key or by an API wallet the master approves with a name and optional expiry; API wallets can only sign, withdrawals and external sends are user-signed, and approving a new wallet deregisters the old. No IP allow-list or address allow-list (24 of 30). An API wallet is a trading-only credential and info needs no key, but nothing limits order size or marks an action as needing approval (10 of 20). The API returns no untrusted content (10). Fills, historical orders, `userRole` and nonces are queryable per account; no per-wallet action log (8 of 15). A bug bounty run by the Hyper Foundation with rewards up to under 1 million USDC, a Zellic audit of the bridge contract, a SECURITY.md on the SDK; no security.txt (403), no SOC 2 (12 of 20). Total 64.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | HTX trading API | Hyperliquid | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 38 | 40 | Hyperliquid +2 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 40 | 42 | Hyperliquid +2 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 69 | 70 | Hyperliquid +1 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 51 | 64 | Hyperliquid +13 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 15 | 55 | Hyperliquid +40 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 57 | 39 | HTX trading API +18 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 25 | 26 | Hyperliquid +1 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **43.3 · E** | **50 · D** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | HTX trading API | Hyperliquid |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | HTX | Hyperliquid Labs |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | | |\n| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | none | The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed |\n| Tools exposed | 0 | 0 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-21 | 2026-06-04 |\n| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read |\n| Popularity | 684 stars | 1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**HTX trading API.** HTX's API has per-endpoint rate limits, read, trade and withdraw key permissions with IP binding, and SDKs in five languages. No official MCP server exists, the testnet is closed, the public reference is still Huobi's with a 2022 changelog, and the fee schedule, terms and restricted countries are on script-drawn pages we couldn't read.\n\n**Hyperliquid.** Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### HTX trading API\n\n1. Ask the operator for a key with Read and Trade only and bound to your IP addresses; a key without IP binding expires after 90 days\n2. Send a fresh client-order-id of up to 64 characters with every order and reuse it only on retry; a repeat within 8 hours answers invalid.client.order.id\n3. Watch X-HB-RateLimit-Requests-Remain and pace at under 100 order calls per 2 seconds per UID; limits are shared by every key on the account\n4. There is no testnet; try order logic with the smallest size the market allows\n5. Confirm the person's country is served before trading; the restricted list in the user agreement couldn't be read here\n\n### Hyperliquid\n\n1. Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with `approveAgent` with a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address\n2. Use the Python SDK's `sign_l1_action` and `sign_user_signed_action`; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives \"User or API Wallet ... does not exist\"\n3. Set a `cloid` on every order and read the per-order `statuses` array; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch\n4. Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data\n5. Arm `scheduleCancel` before unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, HTX trading API or Hyperliquid?\n\nHyperliquid scores 50 (D) on agent readiness against HTX trading API's 43.3 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. HTX trading API leads on maintenance \u0026 community.\n\n### Do HTX trading API and Hyperliquid need an API key?\n\nHTX trading API needs an API key. Hyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.\n\n### Can an agent call HTX trading API and Hyperliquid without installing anything?\n\nNo hosted endpoint is listed for HTX trading API. No hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"htx\", \"b\": \"hyperliquid\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare htx hyperliquid`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/htx.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json\n\n## Other comparisons with HTX trading API or Hyperliquid\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitget vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bitget vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bybit vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bybit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Crypto.com Exchange API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-htx.md)\n- [Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Gate vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-htx.md)\n- [Gate vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Gemini Exchange API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-htx.md)\n- [Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-kraken.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-mexc.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-okx.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-htx.md)\n- [Binance API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-htx.md)\n- [Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-htx.md)\n- [Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Deribit vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-htx.md)\n- [Deribit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [dYdX vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-htx.md)\n- [dYdX vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "" } ], "description": "Hyperliquid scores 50 (D) to HTX trading's 43.3 (E) for exchange market data. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "HTX trading API E 43.3", "Hyperliquid D 50", "scores" ], "h1": "HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "HTX trading vs Hyperliquid for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-03", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 3750, "slim": 1580 }, "version": 1 }