# Hindsight vs Tokenrip (slim)

> Tokenrip scores 59.6 (C) to Hindsight's 50.2 (D) for agent memory. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hindsight-vs-tokenrip.md (~2,500 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hindsight-vs-tokenrip.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hindsight-vs-tokenrip
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Tokenrip scores 59.6 (C) on agent readiness against Hindsight's 50.2 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Hindsight leads on maintenance & community. Both do agent memory.

- Hindsight: D 50.2, rank #903 of 1197 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hindsight.min.md
- Tokenrip: C 59.6, rank #608 of 1197 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tokenrip.min.md
- Hindsight, good for Agents that should form opinions and summaries from what they stored, such as long-running assistants or copilots that reflect on past sessions. Ahead on Maintenance & community, 80 against 70. Also Open source.
- Tokenrip, good for Small teams, or one person with several agents in different tools (Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Cursor, Grok), who want one place for shared files, tasks, decisions and handoffs with a person approving outside actions. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 83 against 68; Agent ergonomics, 70 against 57; Security & auth, 69 against 58; Payments & pricing, 50 against 30; Transparency & trust, 56 against 45. Also Free to start without a card; Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 3.0 out of 5.

| Category | Hindsight | Tokenrip |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 25 | 27 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 68 | 83 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 57 | 70 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 58 | 69 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 50 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 80 | 70 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 45 | 56 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hindsight | Tokenrip |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | Vectorize | Quintel, LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.hindsight.vectorize.io` | `https://api.tokenrip.com/mcp` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP, HTTP |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary hosted service under Tokenrip's terms of service (Quintel, LLC, Texas law). The `rip` CLI and library `@tokenrip/cli` is MIT-licensed on GitHub |
| Tools exposed | 27 | 99 |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.silostack/tokenrip` |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read |  |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read |  |
| Popularity | 43k stars, 44k npm/wk, 227k PyPI/wk | 5 stars, 401 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.8/5 (4) |