# Hermes Agent vs nanobot (slim) > Hermes Agent scores 67.9 (B) to nanobot's 62.4 (B) for assistant proactive. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hermes-agent-vs-nanobot.md (~2,550 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hermes-agent-vs-nanobot.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hermes-agent-vs-nanobot - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-12 Hermes Agent scores 67.9 (B) on agent readiness against nanobot's 62.4 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. nanobot leads on reliability. Both do assistant proactive. - Hermes Agent: B 67.9, rank #244 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hermes-agent.min.md - nanobot: B 62.4, rank #446 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanobot.min.md - Hermes Agent, good for A technical owner who wants one always-on agent across chat apps with memory and scheduled jobs, on their own machine or a small server, with any model. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 80 against 74; Security & auth, 75 against 63; Transparency & trust, 63 against 48. Also Free to start without a card. - nanobot, good for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine across many chat apps, with file-based memory and a free choice of model. Ahead on Reliability, 70 against 57. | Category | Hermes Agent | nanobot | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 57 | 70 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 80 | 77 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 80 | 74 | | Security & auth (14%) | 75 | 63 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 60 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 84 | 82 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 63 | 48 | | Fact (where they differ) | Hermes Agent | nanobot | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Nous Research | HKUDS | | Last release | 2026-10-11 | 2026-09-15 | | Popularity | 253k stars | 49k stars |