# Haven vs NanoClaw (slim)

> NanoClaw scores 68.3 (B) to Haven's 22.2 (F) for assistant proactive. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/haven-vs-nanoclaw.md (~2,550 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/haven-vs-nanoclaw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/haven-vs-nanoclaw
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-12

NanoClaw scores 68.3 (B) on agent readiness against Haven's 22.2 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistant proactive.

- Haven: F 22.2, rank #977 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/haven.min.md
- NanoClaw: B 68.3, rank #229 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanoclaw.min.md
- Haven, good for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them. Also No incidents deducted, where NanoClaw loses 5 points for them.
- NanoClaw, good for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine, reachable from chat apps, with container isolation and scheduled tasks, and who is willing to keep a fork. Ahead on Reliability, 78 against 35; Schema & documentation, 82 against 4; Agent ergonomics, 70 against 6; Security & auth, 74 against 13; Payments & pricing, 60 against 30; Maintenance & community, 78 against 35; Transparency & trust, 65 against 51. Also No key needed to call it; Free to start without a card; Open source.

| Category | Haven | NanoClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 35 | 78 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 4 | 82 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 6 | 70 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 13 | 74 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 35 | 78 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 51 | 65 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Haven | NanoClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Hello Haven, Inc. | NanoCo, Inc. |
| Transports | HTTP |  |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service | MIT |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-10-09 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-24 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-24 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | none | 31k stars |