{
  "data": {
    "a": {
      "slug": "harness-fme",
      "name": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation",
      "vendor": "Harness Inc.",
      "vendorUrl": "https://www.harness.io",
      "kind": "http-api",
      "category": "product-analytics",
      "summary": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation (FME), formerly Split, manages feature flags, targeting, metrics and experiments. Agents reach it through the Admin API at api.split.io and the FME toolset of the Harness MCP server.",
      "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/harness-fme",
      "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/harness-fme.md",
      "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/harness-fme.min.md",
      "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/harness-fme.json",
      "dns": "harness-fme.grade.anchorterminal.com",
      "repo": "https://github.com/harness/mcp-server",
      "transports": [
        "http",
        "stdio",
        "streamable-http"
      ],
      "remoteUrl": "https://mcp.harness.io/mcp",
      "packages": [
        {
          "registry": "npm",
          "name": "harness-mcp-v2"
        }
      ],
      "auth": "mixed",
      "authNotes": "The Admin API takes an Admin API key as a Bearer token, or a Harness personal access token (PAT) or service account token (SAT) in `x-api-key`. Admin keys carry fixed roles that can be combined and cannot be edited after creation, and a key cannot create another with more roles. The local MCP server reads HARNESS_API_KEY. The hosted MCP endpoint uses Harness Platform OAuth and must be enabled per account by Harness Support.",
      "pricing": "freemium",
      "pricingNotes": "An FME Free Plan is enabled from inside a Harness account; its limits are not published. The Enterprise plan and FME pricing are by quotation through sales. No FME prices appear on harness.io/pricing.",
      "priceSummary": "Freemium",
      "where": "both",
      "x402": {
        "level": "no",
        "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the FME docs, the Split API reference or harness.io/pricing (checked 2026-11-06).",
        "endpoints": []
      },
      "toolCount": 11,
      "popularity": {
        "githubStars": null,
        "npmWeekly": 8800,
        "pypiWeekly": null,
        "asOf": "2026-11-06"
      },
      "docsUrl": "https://developer.harness.io/feature-management-experimentation/feature-management-and-experimentation-documentation",
      "llmsTxt": "https://developer.harness.io/llms.txt",
      "capabilities": [
        "analytics.flags",
        "analytics.experiments",
        "analytics.events"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "official",
        "hosted",
        "mcp",
        "remote-mcp",
        "oauth",
        "llms-txt",
        "free-tier",
        "sales-led",
        "status-page",
        "soc2",
        "iso27001",
        "typescript",
        "python",
        "cli",
        "closed-source"
      ],
      "lastRelease": "2026-11-04",
      "graded": true,
      "anchor": {
        "graded": true,
        "score": 69.2,
        "grade": "B",
        "agentReady": false,
        "rank": 257,
        "ranked": true,
        "rankOf": 1486,
        "categoryRank": 4,
        "methodology": "0.7",
        "run": "2026-10-01",
        "scores": {
          "ergonomics": 83,
          "maintenance": 81,
          "payments": 15,
          "reliability": 80,
          "schema": 71,
          "security": 79,
          "transparency": 61
        },
        "pending": [
          "performance",
          "tasks"
        ],
        "assessment": {
          "confidence": "medium",
          "date": "2026-11-06"
        },
        "negative": 0,
        "verdict": "Harness FME, formerly Split, gives agents 11 consolidated MCP tools with an FME-only toolset, a read-only switch and confirmation on writes, over an Admin API with documented limits and role-scoped keys. FME prices are not published, the free plan's limits are unstated, and the hosted MCP endpoint must be enabled by Harness Support.",
        "bestFor": "Teams already on Harness, or Split customers, who want agents to inspect and change flags and segments with guard rails.",
        "strengths": [
          "11 generic MCP tools with `--toolsets=fme`, readOnlyHint on reads and elicitation before writes",
          "HARNESS_READ_ONLY blocks every create, update, delete and execute call",
          "Admin API keys with fixed, combinable roles, plus Harness PATs and SATs",
          "Documented rate limit with remaining and reset headers, and automatic backoff in the MCP server",
          "SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and FedRAMP 20x, with FME audit logs and MCP audit sinks"
        ],
        "weaknesses": [
          "No FME prices are published; Enterprise is by quotation and free plan limits are unstated",
          "The hosted MCP endpoint must be enabled per account by Harness Support",
          "The FME MCP docs page still describes building a Go binary, unlike the current npm package",
          "About 20 Admin API requests per 10 seconds per organisation, which large lists can hit",
          "No public OpenAPI file for the Admin API was found"
        ],
        "agentNotes": [
          "Start the MCP server with `--toolsets=fme` so only FME resource types load",
          "Call `harness_describe(resource_type='fme_feature_flag')` before a create or update to see the fields",
          "Filter fme_feature_flag lists by name, tags or rollout status rather than listing every flag",
          "Set HARNESS_READ_ONLY for analysis tasks; leave confirmation on for kill, restore and delete",
          "On 429, wait at least the larger X-RateLimit-Reset-Seconds value before retrying"
        ],
        "metrics": {
          "kind": "remote",
          "measured": false
        },
        "reviewCount": 0,
        "avgRating": 0,
        "history": [
          {
            "basis": "public evidence",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "grade": "B",
            "methodology": "0.7",
            "pending": [
              "performance",
              "tasks"
            ],
            "run": "2026-10-01",
            "runLabel": "October 2026 research run",
            "score": 69.2
          }
        ],
        "editorialScores": {
          "ergonomics": 83,
          "maintenance": 81,
          "payments": 15,
          "reliability": 80,
          "schema": 71,
          "security": 79,
          "transparency": 60
        },
        "provenanceScore": 61,
        "checked": {
          "categories": {
            "ergonomics": "2026-11-06",
            "maintenance": "2026-11-06",
            "payments": "2026-11-06",
            "reliability": "2026-11-06",
            "schema": "2026-11-06",
            "security": "2026-11-06",
            "transparency": "2026-11-06"
          },
          "last": "2026-11-06",
          "oldest": "2026-11-06",
          "stale": false,
          "staleAfterDays": 90
        }
      },
      "connect": {
        "install": "npx harness-mcp-v2@latest",
        "config": {
          "mcpServers": {
            "harness": {
              "args": [
                "harness-mcp-v2@latest",
                "--toolsets=fme"
              ],
              "command": "npx",
              "env": {
                "HARNESS_API_KEY": "pat.xxx"
              }
            }
          }
        }
      },
      "letme": {
        "capability": "https://letme.dev/analytics.flags",
        "tool": "https://letme.dev/harness-fme"
      },
      "area": "business",
      "provenance": {
        "legalEntity": "Harness Inc.",
        "domain": "harness.io",
        "domainRegistered": "",
        "endpointOnVendorDomain": false,
        "terms": "https://www.harness.io/legal/subscription-terms",
        "privacy": "https://www.harness.io/legal/privacy",
        "statusPage": "https://status.harness.io",
        "changelog": "https://github.com/harness/mcp-server/releases",
        "securityTxt": "none",
        "checked": "2026-11-06",
        "notes": [
          "The Admin API is on api.split.io, the former Split domain, and the hosted MCP endpoint on mcp.harness.io.",
          "The privacy statement names Harness Inc. as controller and Harness France SAS as EU representative. Its header says last updated 23 October 2026 and its body says version of 14 October 2026.",
          "developer.harness.io/robots.txt allows all and carries Content-Signal ai-train=yes, search=yes, ai-input=yes. docs.split.io allows all but edit and login paths.",
          "www.harness.io/.well-known/security.txt answered with an invalid-request page. The security page gives security@harness.io and a private bug bounty on request.",
          "RDAP gave no registration date for harness.io."
        ],
        "score": 61
      },
      "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/harness-fme.json",
      "live": {
        "slug": "harness-fme",
        "probe": {
          "target": "https://mcp.harness.io/mcp",
          "method": "get",
          "lastAt": "2026-11-07T18:20:29.454967067Z",
          "lastOk": true,
          "lastStatus": 401,
          "lastMs": 211,
          "lastNote": "asks for credentials",
          "authRequired": true,
          "uptime24h": 100,
          "uptime30d": 100,
          "p50ms24h": 195,
          "p95ms24h": 280,
          "samples24h": 200,
          "samples30d": 200,
          "days": [
            {
              "date": "2026-11-06",
              "probes": 13,
              "ok": 13
            },
            {
              "date": "2026-11-07",
              "probes": 187,
              "ok": 187
            }
          ]
        },
        "vendorStatus": {
          "page": "https://status.harness.io",
          "indicator": "none",
          "summary": "All Systems Operational",
          "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T18:21:14.597545686Z"
        },
        "versions": [
          {
            "registry": "github",
            "name": "harness/mcp-server",
            "version": "v3.2.40",
            "released": "2026-11-05",
            "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:32:13.419387707Z"
          },
          {
            "registry": "npm",
            "name": "harness-mcp-v2",
            "version": "3.2.40",
            "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:32:12.430886041Z"
          }
        ],
        "githubStars": 112,
        "npmWeekly": 8800,
        "securityTxt": {
          "url": "https://harness.io/.well-known/security.txt",
          "state": "none",
          "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T16:01:19.957252225Z"
        },
        "llmsTxt": {
          "url": "https://developer.harness.io/llms.txt",
          "ok": true,
          "status": 200,
          "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T15:32:41.749004752Z"
        },
        "pages": [
          {
            "url": "https://www.harness.io/legal/privacy",
            "kind": "privacy",
            "status": 200,
            "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:29:30.551687912Z",
            "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z",
            "fingerprint": "b15935b42065"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://www.harness.io/legal/subscription-terms",
            "kind": "terms",
            "status": 200,
            "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:29:35.70684084Z",
            "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z",
            "fingerprint": "871b29e12dd4"
          }
        ],
        "updatedAt": "2026-11-07T18:21:14.597545686Z"
      }
    },
    "answer": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation scores 69.2 (B) on agent readiness against Matomo's 61.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Matomo leads on payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.",
    "b": {
      "slug": "matomo",
      "name": "Matomo",
      "vendor": "InnoCraft Limited",
      "vendorUrl": "https://matomo.org",
      "kind": "http-api",
      "category": "product-analytics",
      "summary": "Matomo is an open-source web and product analytics platform from InnoCraft, sold as Matomo Cloud or run on the owner's servers. Agents query reports and manage configuration through its Reporting HTTP API or the official MCP server plugin.",
      "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/matomo",
      "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/matomo.md",
      "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/matomo.min.md",
      "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/matomo.json",
      "dns": "matomo.grade.anchorterminal.com",
      "repo": "https://github.com/matomo-org/matomo",
      "license": "Matomo core is GPL-3.0-or-later and the MCP server plugin is GPL v3 or later. Matomo Cloud is a hosted service under InnoCraft's terms. Paid On-Premise plugins fall under the InnoCraft EULA",
      "transports": [
        "http",
        "streamable-http"
      ],
      "packages": [],
      "auth": "mixed",
      "authNotes": "Self-serve once an instance exists. A user creates a `token_auth` under Administration, Personal, Security, with an optional expiry date and a POST-only setting, and from Matomo 6 an access level. The token goes in an `Authorization: Bearer` header, a POST body or, as the docs first show it, the URL. The OAuth 2.0 plugin adds authorisation code with PKCE, client credentials and refresh token grants and four scopes, one a token. A superuser must enable the MCP server before any client can connect.",
      "pricing": "paid",
      "pricingNotes": "Matomo Cloud starts at $26 a month for 50,000 hits and rises by tier to $17,900 for 100 million, with two months free on annual billing and overage fees past the allowance. The trial needs no credit card. API and MCP calls are not metered. Enterprise is on quotation. Matomo On-Premise is free to self-host, with paid plugin bundles from €230 a month.",
      "priceSummary": "$26 / mo",
      "where": "local",
      "x402": {
        "level": "no",
        "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API reference, the MCP server plugin, the Cloud terms or the pricing page (checked 2026-10-09).",
        "endpoints": []
      },
      "toolCount": 19,
      "popularity": {
        "githubStars": null,
        "npmWeekly": null,
        "pypiWeekly": null,
        "asOf": "2026-10-09"
      },
      "docsUrl": "https://developer.matomo.org/api-reference/reporting-api",
      "capabilities": [
        "analytics.query",
        "analytics.events",
        "analytics.funnels",
        "analytics.experiments"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "official",
        "hosted",
        "self-hosted",
        "open-source",
        "mcp",
        "oauth",
        "api-key",
        "openapi",
        "paid",
        "trial",
        "no-card",
        "eu-region",
        "status-page",
        "iso27001",
        "bug-bounty",
        "php"
      ],
      "lastRelease": "2026-10-22",
      "graded": true,
      "anchor": {
        "graded": true,
        "score": 61.7,
        "grade": "C",
        "agentReady": false,
        "rank": 594,
        "ranked": true,
        "rankOf": 1486,
        "categoryRank": 11,
        "methodology": "0.7",
        "run": "2026-10-01",
        "scores": {
          "ergonomics": 78,
          "maintenance": 79,
          "payments": 30,
          "reliability": 38,
          "schema": 73,
          "security": 71,
          "transparency": 74
        },
        "pending": [
          "performance",
          "tasks"
        ],
        "assessment": {
          "confidence": "medium",
          "date": "2026-11-04"
        },
        "negative": 0,
        "verdict": "The Reporting API covers reports, funnels, cohorts and experiments with an OpenAPI 3.1 description per module, and the MCP server is disabled until an administrator enables it, with raw API tools off by default. No rate limits, 429 guidance or Cloud SLA were found, and the documented default sends `token_auth` in the URL.",
        "bestFor": "Teams that want web and product analytics with data kept in the EU or on their own servers, queried by report, segment, funnel or cohort.",
        "strengths": [
          "The API reference lists 72 modules, each with an OpenAPI 3.1 description embedded in its page, including Funnels (17 operations), Cohorts and A/B testing.",
          "The official MCP server plugin is included with Matomo Cloud, has 19 typed tools with read-only, destructive and idempotent annotations, and hides its seven raw API tools by default.",
          "An OAuth 2.0 authorisation server plugin issues bearer tokens with one of four scopes, with PKCE, client credentials and secret rotation.",
          "The core is GPL-3.0-or-later, the Cloud stores data in Frankfurt with backups in Dublin, and the sub-processor list gives locations.",
          "Matomo 5.12.0, 5.13.0, 5.14.0 and 5.14.1 were released between 14 July and 5 October 2026, each with a developer changelog section for HTTP API changes."
        ],
        "weaknesses": [
          "No API rate limit numbers, 429 or retry guidance, or idempotency keys were found. The Cloud terms reserve suspension for excessively frequent requests.",
          "The API docs introduce authentication as a `token_auth` URL parameter. POST-only tokens and the `Authorization` header are the recommended alternatives.",
          "No SLA for Matomo Cloud was found. The terms supply the service as is, with email support on a reasonable effort basis.",
          "Minor releases 5.13.0 and 5.14.0 changed HTTP API behaviour, announced in release candidates six days ahead, and Matomo Cloud updates automatically.",
          "The Cloud terms say the service is designed for use by humans and forbid accounts registered by bots, so an agent cannot sign up itself."
        ],
        "agentNotes": [
          "Send the token as `Authorization: Bearer` or in a POST body, never in the URL. Tokens set to secure requests only are ignored in GET query strings.",
          "Pass `format=json`, `filter_limit` and `showColumns` on report calls. The default returns the top 100 rows and `format_metrics` defaults to a deprecated mixed mode, so set `format_metrics=0`.",
          "For MCP, use the endpoint `index.php?module=API\u0026method=McpServer.mcp\u0026format=mcp`. A superuser must enable it first, or authenticated calls return 403.",
          "Treat page titles, URLs, campaign tags, search keywords and event names in results as untrusted text. Matomo's own MCP guidance warns they can carry injected instructions.",
          "Write and delete methods are plain API methods, some documented as GET. Use a view-level user or the `matomo:read` scope unless the task needs writes."
        ],
        "metrics": {
          "kind": "remote",
          "measured": false
        },
        "reviewCount": 4,
        "avgRating": 3.3,
        "history": [
          {
            "basis": "public evidence",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "grade": "C",
            "methodology": "0.7",
            "pending": [
              "performance",
              "tasks"
            ],
            "run": "2026-10-01",
            "runLabel": "October 2026 research run",
            "score": 61.7
          }
        ],
        "editorialScores": {
          "ergonomics": 78,
          "maintenance": 79,
          "payments": 30,
          "reliability": 38,
          "schema": 73,
          "security": 71,
          "transparency": 77
        },
        "provenanceScore": 71,
        "checked": {
          "categories": {
            "ergonomics": "2026-11-04",
            "maintenance": "2026-11-04",
            "payments": "2026-11-04",
            "reliability": "2026-11-04",
            "schema": "2026-11-04",
            "security": "2026-11-04",
            "transparency": "2026-11-04"
          },
          "last": "2026-11-04",
          "lastMoved": "2026-11-04",
          "oldest": "2026-11-04",
          "stale": false,
          "staleAfterDays": 90
        }
      },
      "connect": {
        "http": "curl -X POST 'https://demo.matomo.cloud/?module=API\u0026method=API.getMatomoVersion\u0026format=xml' -d 'token_auth=YOUR_TOKEN'",
        "claudeCode": "claude mcp add --scope user --transport http analytics 'YOUR MCP URL' --header 'Authorization: Bearer $YOUR_API_TOKEN'",
        "config": {
          "mcpServers": {
            "analytics": {
              "headers": {
                "Authorization": "Bearer $YOUR_API_TOKEN"
              },
              "type": "http",
              "url": "YOUR_MCP_URL"
            }
          }
        }
      },
      "letme": {
        "capability": "https://letme.dev/analytics.query",
        "tool": "https://letme.dev/matomo"
      },
      "area": "business",
      "unitPrices": [
        {
          "item": "Matomo Cloud, 50,000 hits a month",
          "unit": "month",
          "usd": 26,
          "note": "lowest tier, billed monthly, excluding tax, from the pricing page's structured data"
        },
        {
          "item": "Matomo Cloud, 1 million hits a month",
          "unit": "month",
          "usd": 204,
          "note": "billed monthly, excluding tax, from the pricing page's structured data"
        }
      ],
      "provenance": {
        "legalEntity": "InnoCraft Limited",
        "domain": "matomo.org",
        "domainRegistered": "2017-09-08",
        "endpointOnVendorDomain": false,
        "terms": "https://matomo.org/matomo-cloud-terms-of-service/",
        "privacy": "https://matomo.org/matomo-cloud-privacy-policy/",
        "statusPage": "https://status.matomo.cloud",
        "changelog": "https://matomo.org/changelog/",
        "securityTxt": "none",
        "checked": "2026-10-09",
        "notes": [
          "The Cloud terms (released 11 March 2025, effective 10 April 2025) name InnoCraft Limited, a New Zealand company with registration number 6106769, at 7 Waterloo Quay, Wellington, and are governed by New Zealand law.",
          "The Matomo Cloud Privacy Policy (effective 5 May 2026) covers customers' and users' personal data in the Cloud service. Data about a customer's own visitors is governed by the Cloud DPA, which the terms incorporate.",
          "Cloud instances, the demo instance and the status page are on matomo.cloud, a second domain. The status page's markup gives InnoCraft as the company.",
          "matomo.org/.well-known/security.txt redirects to a page that answers 404. The security page gives security@matomo.org and a HackerOne programme.",
          "RDAP for matomo.org gives a registration date of 2017-09-08 and OVH sas as registrar. The project was called Piwik before that.",
          "Matomo On-Premise is governed by the GPL and, for paid plugins, the Marketplace terms and the InnoCraft EULA, not by the Cloud terms."
        ],
        "score": 71
      },
      "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/matomo.json",
      "live": {
        "slug": "matomo",
        "vendorStatus": {
          "page": "https://status.matomo.cloud",
          "indicator": "unknown",
          "summary": "no machine-readable status found",
          "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T04:48:02.295239813Z"
        },
        "versions": [
          {
            "registry": "github",
            "name": "matomo-org/matomo",
            "version": "5.14.2",
            "released": "2026-10-22",
            "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:43:07.543718114Z"
          }
        ],
        "githubStars": 22009,
        "securityTxt": {
          "url": "https://matomo.org/.well-known/security.txt",
          "state": "none",
          "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T15:59:43.144570372Z"
        },
        "domain": {
          "domain": "matomo.org",
          "registered": "2017-09-08",
          "source": "https://rdap.publicinterestregistry.org/rdap/domain/matomo.org",
          "checkedAt": "2026-11-01T14:17:14.90149587Z"
        },
        "pages": [
          {
            "url": "https://matomo.org/changelog/",
            "kind": "changelog",
            "status": 200,
            "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:13:57.181176492Z",
            "changedAt": "2026-10-31T06:16:04.074894003Z",
            "fingerprint": "3d63fd664977"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://matomo.org/matomo-cloud-privacy-policy/",
            "kind": "privacy",
            "status": 200,
            "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:13:59.321323026Z",
            "changedAt": "2026-10-30T05:43:40.477472466Z",
            "fingerprint": "d2213e52b10d"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://matomo.org/matomo-cloud-terms-of-service/",
            "kind": "terms",
            "status": 200,
            "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:14:01.323326704Z",
            "changedAt": "2026-10-30T05:43:42.62580701Z",
            "fingerprint": "14c50b7a8208"
          }
        ],
        "github": {
          "repo": "matomo-org/matomo",
          "checkedAt": "2026-11-02T09:04:03.033151703Z",
          "stars": 21999,
          "archived": false,
          "issuesEnabled": true,
          "pushedAt": "2026-11-02T08:45:00Z",
          "openIssues": 2433,
          "openPRs": 128,
          "issuesOpened90d": 91,
          "issuesClosed90d": 111,
          "prsMerged90d": 464,
          "ci": {
            "branch": "6.x-dev",
            "runs": 50,
            "success": 11,
            "failure": 23,
            "other": 16,
            "latest": "failure",
            "latestAt": "2026-11-02T00:53:20Z"
          },
          "replies": {
            "sampled": 25,
            "unanswered": 10,
            "medianDays": 7.2
          }
        },
        "updatedAt": "2026-11-07T15:59:43.144570372Z"
      }
    },
    "edges": [
      {
        "by": 42,
        "category": "reliability",
        "leads": "harness-fme",
        "name": "Reliability",
        "reasons": {
          "a": "Graded on the hosted FME Admin API with the hosted lines. Statuspage at status.harness.io with an FME component among 196 (20). In the 90 days from 8 August, two FME incidents: API write operations returned 499 errors for 30 minutes on 20 August (minor) and the FME user interface was unavailable for 15 minutes on 23 August (major, interface only; flag evaluation was unaffected per the post). No API outage of an hour or more (20 of 30). About 20 Admin API requests per 10 seconds per organisation and per IP, documented on the MCP page (15). 429 responses carry remaining and reset headers with guidance to wait for the larger reset, and the MCP server backs off and retries three times (15). No SLA was found on harness.io/pricing or the FME docs (0). FME is generally available and the MCP server is at 3.2.40 (10). 20+20+15+15+0+10 = 80.",
          "b": "Graded on the hosted lines, for a Matomo Cloud instance reached through the Reporting HTTP API and the MCP server included with Cloud. status.matomo.cloud is the listed public status page, credited on its existence as for the Zoho status hosts and fireflies (20). On 4 November its robots.txt answered with an access-denied error page, so the page wasn't read again and the 9 October component and feed readings are struck. No 90-day incident record could be read then or now (5). No API rate limit numbers were found. The terms reserve suspension for excessively frequent requests, and `API.getBulkRequest` is capped at 50 URLs for anonymous callers (3 of 15). No 429 or retry guidance and no idempotency keys were found (0). No SLA for Cloud was found, and the terms supply the service as is (0). The Reporting API and MCP plugin 5.1.1 are stable releases (10)."
        },
        "scores": {
          "a": 80,
          "b": 38
        }
      },
      {
        "by": 15,
        "category": "payments",
        "leads": "matomo",
        "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing",
        "reasons": {
          "a": "No x402, MPP or L402 (0). No FME prices are published; harness.io/pricing lists FME only under Enterprise, priced by quotation (0). The docs describe a Start FME Free Plan step inside a Harness account; its limits and whether a card is needed aren't stated (15 of 20). A person signs up for Harness in a browser and creates a key or token (0). 0+0+15+0 = 15.",
          "b": "Scored for Matomo Cloud, the hosted option. No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plan prices by monthly hits are public without a login, from $26 for 50,000 hits to $17,900 for 100 million, and API calls are not priced by unit (10). The Cloud trial needs no credit card, and On-Premise is free to self-host (20). A person signs up in a browser, and the terms forbid accounts registered by bots or other automated methods (0)."
        },
        "scores": {
          "a": 15,
          "b": 30
        }
      },
      {
        "by": 13,
        "category": "transparency",
        "leads": "matomo",
        "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust",
        "reasons": {
          "a": "A closed service under Harness's subscription terms; the MCP server is MIT (18 of 30). The privacy statement covers website and sales data and defers customer data to the customer agreement and a published DPA; retention periods for customer data weren't found (18 of 30). A versioning policy for SDKs with support windows, and Split-era API endpoints marked deprecated with migration guides (14 of 20). Sub-processors are on the trust centre, which we didn't read, and the security page doesn't name data locations (10 of 20). 18+18+14+10 = 60.",
          "b": "The core and the MCP plugin are GPL v3 or later. Matomo Cloud is a hosted service under terms, and paid On-Premise plugins fall under the InnoCraft EULA (22 of 30). The Cloud terms, DPA and privacy policy agree. Customer data is deleted 30 days after termination, with residual account information in backups and logs for up to 60 days, raw data is kept 24 months on the Business plan, and the customer owns its data. The privacy policy gives no period for account data (25). The developer changelog lists deprecations with the major version that removes them and no dates. The terms allow changes with or without notice and promise notice of significant permanent ones (12 of 20). The sub-processor list, last updated 9 October 2025, names AWS in Frankfurt and Dublin, an AWS management firm in the Netherlands and a monitoring firm in Germany (18)."
        },
        "scores": {
          "a": 61,
          "b": 74
        }
      },
      {
        "by": 8,
        "category": "security",
        "leads": "harness-fme",
        "name": "Security \u0026 auth",
        "reasons": {
          "a": "Admin API keys with combinable roles that can't be widened after creation, Harness PATs and SATs for central management, and Harness Platform OAuth on the hosted MCP endpoint. Credentials travel in headers (28 of 30). HARNESS_READ_ONLY removes every write, writes go through elicitation with a risk threshold for auto-approval, and FME change requests add approval for flag changes (19 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance; the tools return flag names, descriptions and rule data written by people (3 of 15). FME admin, environment and object audit logs, plus structured MCP audit events to file, webhook or OpenTelemetry sinks (13 of 15). SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018, FedRAMP 20x, a security@harness.io disclosure route with a 24-hour response, a private bug bounty on request and annual external penetration tests. No security.txt (16 of 20). 28+19+3+13+16 = 79.",
          "b": "OAuth 2.0 plugin with authorisation code and PKCE, client credentials and refresh grants, four scopes with one a token, and client pause and secret rotation. `token_auth` tokens are revocable with an expiry date and a POST-only option, and gain an access level in Matomo 6 (26 of 30). Less 10 because the API docs present `token_auth` as a URL parameter (16). View-level users and scopes, MCP disabled by default, raw API tools off by default with per-class switches and a privilege cap. No confirmation step in the server (16 of 20). Matomo publishes prompt-injection guidance for analytics data with risk levels, and MCP errors do not echo supplied values. No filtering of tool output was found (11 of 15). Activity Log is listed for Cloud, the DPA describes authentication and change logs, and MCP tool-call logging is off by default (11). HackerOne bounty up to $13,000, a disclosure policy, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification stated, security fixes noted in release notes. No security.txt (17)."
        },
        "scores": {
          "a": 79,
          "b": 71
        }
      },
      {
        "by": 5,
        "category": "ergonomics",
        "leads": "harness-fme",
        "name": "Agent ergonomics",
        "reasons": {
          "a": "11 consolidated tools, and `--toolsets=fme` narrows the server to FME (25). Flag lists filter server-side by name, tag and rollout status, and the Admin API paginates with markerLimit (17 of 20). Documented status codes, 429 headers, and a harness_diagnose tool. Error bodies aren't documented per endpoint (14 of 20). harness_list and harness_get carry readOnlyHint, write tools ask for confirmation by elicitation, and harness_delete is marked destructive. No idempotency keys (15 of 20). Two required settings (API key, optional org and project, account ID read from the token); a Python Admin API wrapper and CLI, and SDKs in more than a dozen languages for evaluation (12 of 15). 25+17+14+15+12 = 83.",
          "b": "The MCP server has 19 tools, 12 of them visible by default (15), plus 6 because the seven raw API tools stay hidden until an administrator allows them by read, create, update or delete class (21). `filter_limit`, `filter_offset`, sorting, pattern filters, `showColumns` and segments on the API, and cursors with a 250-row cap on the MCP report tool (20). Errors are HTTP codes with a message and an optional integer code, with no code catalogue. The MCP server separates schema failures (-32602) from tool result errors that name the arguments involved (14). Every MCP tool carries readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint. API writes have no idempotency keys and the OpenAPI descriptions declare delete methods as GET (13). Report calls need only `idSite`, `period` and `date`. The official clients for JavaScript, PHP and Java cover tracking, not the Reporting API (10)."
        },
        "scores": {
          "a": 83,
          "b": 78
        }
      }
    ],
    "facts": [
      {
        "a": "HTTP API",
        "b": "HTTP API",
        "name": "Kind"
      },
      {
        "a": "Harness Inc.",
        "b": "InnoCraft Limited",
        "name": "Vendor"
      },
      {
        "a": "https://mcp.harness.io/mcp",
        "b": "no (local only)",
        "name": "Hosted endpoint"
      },
      {
        "a": "HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP",
        "b": "HTTP, Streamable HTTP",
        "name": "Transports"
      },
      {
        "a": "OAuth or key",
        "b": "OAuth or key",
        "name": "Auth"
      },
      {
        "a": "Freemium",
        "b": "Paid",
        "name": "Pricing"
      },
      {
        "a": "no",
        "b": "no",
        "name": "x402"
      },
      {
        "a": "none",
        "b": "Matomo core is GPL-3.0-or-later and the MCP server plugin is GPL v3 or later. Matomo Cloud is a hosted service under InnoCraft's terms. Paid On-Premise plugins fall under the InnoCraft EULA",
        "name": "Licence"
      },
      {
        "a": "11",
        "b": "19",
        "name": "Tools exposed"
      },
      {
        "a": "no",
        "b": "yes",
        "name": "Read-only variant documented"
      },
      {
        "a": "yes",
        "b": "no",
        "name": "llms.txt"
      },
      {
        "a": "2026-11-04",
        "b": "2026-10-22",
        "name": "Last release"
      },
      {
        "a": "no date given",
        "b": "2025-04-10",
        "name": "Terms last updated"
      },
      {
        "a": "no date given",
        "b": "2026-05-05",
        "name": "Privacy policy last updated"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "not found in the text",
        "name": "Customer content may train models"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "yes",
        "name": "Terms restrict automated access"
      },
      {
        "a": "yes",
        "b": "not found in the text",
        "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "yes",
        "name": "Terms or service can change without notice"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "not found in the text",
        "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver"
      },
      {
        "a": "8.8k npm/wk",
        "b": "none",
        "name": "Popularity"
      },
      {
        "a": "none",
        "b": "3.3/5 (4)",
        "name": "Agent reviews"
      }
    ],
    "faq": [
      {
        "answer": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation scores 69.2 (B) on agent readiness against Matomo's 61.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Matomo leads on payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.",
        "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation or Matomo?"
      },
      {
        "answer": "Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.",
        "question": "Do Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation and Matomo need an API key?"
      },
      {
        "answer": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.harness.io/mcp. No hosted endpoint is listed for Matomo.",
        "question": "Can an agent call Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation and Matomo without installing anything?"
      },
      {
        "answer": "No open-source release is listed for Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation. Matomo is open source (Matomo core is GPL-3.0-or-later and the MCP server plugin is GPL v3 or later. Matomo Cloud is a hosted service under InnoCraft's terms. Paid On-Premise plugins fall under the InnoCraft EULA).",
        "question": "Are Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation and Matomo open source?"
      }
    ],
    "goodFor": [
      {
        "aheadOn": [
          "Reliability, 80 against 38",
          "Agent ergonomics, 83 against 78",
          "Security \u0026 auth, 79 against 71"
        ],
        "also": [
          "A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install",
          "Runs on your own machine"
        ],
        "goodFor": "Teams already on Harness, or Split customers, who want agents to inspect and change flags and segments with guard rails.",
        "slug": "harness-fme",
        "watchFor": "No FME prices are published; Enterprise is by quotation and free plan limits are unstated"
      },
      {
        "aheadOn": [
          "Payments \u0026 pricing, 30 against 15",
          "Transparency \u0026 trust, 74 against 61"
        ],
        "also": [
          "Free to start without a card",
          "Open source"
        ],
        "goodFor": "Teams that want web and product analytics with data kept in the EU or on their own servers, queried by report, segment, funnel or cohort.",
        "slug": "matomo",
        "watchFor": "No API rate limit numbers, 429 or retry guidance, or idempotency keys were found. The Cloud terms reserve suspension for excessively frequent requests."
      }
    ],
    "history": {
      "harness-fme": null,
      "matomo": [
        {
          "causes": [
            "correction"
          ],
          "date": "2026-11-04",
          "delta": 2,
          "from": 59.7,
          "fromGrade": "C",
          "to": 61.7,
          "toGrade": "C"
        },
        {
          "causes": [
            "evidence"
          ],
          "date": "2026-10-28",
          "delta": 0.1,
          "from": 59.6,
          "fromGrade": "C",
          "to": 59.7,
          "toGrade": "C"
        },
        {
          "causes": [
            "method"
          ],
          "date": "2026-10-27",
          "delta": 0.1,
          "from": 59.5,
          "fromGrade": "C",
          "to": 59.6,
          "toGrade": "C"
        }
      ]
    },
    "job": {
      "capability": "analytics.experiments",
      "name": "Feature flags and experiments"
    },
    "others": [
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amplitude-vs-matomo.json",
        "title": "Amplitude vs Matomo",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amplitude-vs-matomo"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basedash-mcp-vs-matomo.json",
        "title": "Basedash MCP vs Matomo",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basedash-mcp-vs-matomo"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-matomo.json",
        "title": "Countly vs Matomo",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-matomo"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullstory-vs-matomo.json",
        "title": "Fullstory vs Matomo",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullstory-vs-matomo"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-mixpanel.json",
        "title": "Matomo vs Mixpanel",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-mixpanel"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-mostly-good-metrics.json",
        "title": "Matomo vs Mostly Good Metrics",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-mostly-good-metrics"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-openpanel.json",
        "title": "Matomo vs OpenPanel",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-openpanel"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-optimizely.json",
        "title": "Matomo vs Optimizely Experimentation",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-optimizely"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-pendo.json",
        "title": "Matomo vs Pendo",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-pendo"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-posthog.json",
        "title": "Matomo vs PostHog",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-posthog"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-statsig.json",
        "title": "Matomo vs Statsig",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-statsig"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-userpilot.json",
        "title": "Matomo vs Userpilot",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-userpilot"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-woopra.json",
        "title": "Matomo vs Woopra",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-woopra"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amplitude-vs-harness-fme.json",
        "title": "Amplitude vs Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amplitude-vs-harness-fme"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-harness-fme.json",
        "title": "Countly vs Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-harness-fme"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flagsmith-vs-harness-fme.json",
        "title": "Flagsmith vs Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flagsmith-vs-harness-fme"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-launchdarkly.json",
        "title": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs LaunchDarkly",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-launchdarkly"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-mixpanel.json",
        "title": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Mixpanel",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-mixpanel"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-optimizely.json",
        "title": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Optimizely Experimentation",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-optimizely"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-posthog.json",
        "title": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs PostHog",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-posthog"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-statsig.json",
        "title": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Statsig",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-statsig"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullstory-vs-harness-fme.json",
        "title": "Fullstory vs Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullstory-vs-harness-fme"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-heap.json",
        "title": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Heap",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-heap"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-openpanel.json",
        "title": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs OpenPanel",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-openpanel"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-woopra.json",
        "title": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Woopra",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-woopra"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/heap-vs-matomo.json",
        "title": "Heap vs Matomo",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/heap-vs-matomo"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flagsmith-vs-matomo.json",
        "title": "Flagsmith vs Matomo",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flagsmith-vs-matomo"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/growthbook-vs-harness-fme.json",
        "title": "GrowthBook vs Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/growthbook-vs-harness-fme"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/growthbook-vs-matomo.json",
        "title": "GrowthBook vs Matomo",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/growthbook-vs-matomo"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-mostly-good-metrics.json",
        "title": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Mostly Good Metrics",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-mostly-good-metrics"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/launchdarkly-vs-matomo.json",
        "title": "LaunchDarkly vs Matomo",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/launchdarkly-vs-matomo"
      }
    ],
    "panel": null,
    "scores": [
      {
        "by": 42,
        "edge": "harness-fme",
        "harness-fme": 80,
        "key": "reliability",
        "matomo": 38,
        "name": "Reliability",
        "weight": 16
      },
      {
        "key": "performance",
        "name": "Performance",
        "pending": true,
        "weight": 10
      },
      {
        "by": 2,
        "edge": "matomo",
        "harness-fme": 71,
        "key": "schema",
        "matomo": 73,
        "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation",
        "weight": 13
      },
      {
        "by": 5,
        "edge": "harness-fme",
        "harness-fme": 83,
        "key": "ergonomics",
        "matomo": 78,
        "name": "Agent ergonomics",
        "weight": 13
      },
      {
        "by": 8,
        "edge": "harness-fme",
        "harness-fme": 79,
        "key": "security",
        "matomo": 71,
        "name": "Security \u0026 auth",
        "weight": 14
      },
      {
        "by": 15,
        "edge": "matomo",
        "harness-fme": 15,
        "key": "payments",
        "matomo": 30,
        "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing",
        "weight": 10
      },
      {
        "key": "tasks",
        "name": "Task success",
        "pending": true,
        "weight": 10
      },
      {
        "by": 2,
        "edge": "harness-fme",
        "harness-fme": 81,
        "key": "maintenance",
        "matomo": 79,
        "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community",
        "weight": 7
      },
      {
        "by": 13,
        "edge": "matomo",
        "harness-fme": 61,
        "key": "transparency",
        "matomo": 74,
        "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust",
        "weight": 7
      }
    ],
    "summary": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation scores 69.2 (B) on agent readiness against Matomo's 61.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Matomo leads on payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do feature flags and experiments.",
    "tasks": null,
    "tutorials": [],
    "verdicts": {
      "harness-fme": "Harness FME, formerly Split, gives agents 11 consolidated MCP tools with an FME-only toolset, a read-only switch and confirmation on writes, over an Admin API with documented limits and role-scoped keys. FME prices are not published, the free plan's limits are unstated, and the hosted MCP endpoint must be enabled by Harness Support.",
      "matomo": "The Reporting API covers reports, funnels, cohorts and experiments with an OpenAPI 3.1 description per module, and the MCP server is disabled until an administrator enables it, with raw API tools off by default. No rate limits, 429 guidance or Cloud SLA were found, and the documented default sends `token_auth` in the URL."
    }
  },
  "kind": "anchor.page",
  "links": {
    "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json",
    "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-matomo",
    "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-matomo.json",
    "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt",
    "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-matomo.md",
    "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp",
    "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-matomo.min.md"
  },
  "markdown": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation scores 69.2 (B) on agent readiness against Matomo's 61.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Matomo leads on payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do feature flags and experiments.\n\n- Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation: grade B, 69.2/100, rank #257 of 1486. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/harness-fme.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/harness-fme.json\n- Matomo: grade C, 61.7/100, rank #594 of 1486. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/matomo.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/matomo.json\n- Best product analytics and experimentation tools for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/product-analytics/index.md\n- All 153 product analytics comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/product-analytics/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation (B)\n\nGood for: Teams already on Harness, or Split customers, who want agents to inspect and change flags and segments with guard rails.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 80 against 38\n- Agent ergonomics, 83 against 78\n- Security \u0026 auth, 79 against 71\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install\n- Runs on your own machine\n\nWatch for: No FME prices are published; Enterprise is by quotation and free plan limits are unstated\n\n### Matomo (C)\n\nGood for: Teams that want web and product analytics with data kept in the EU or on their own servers, queried by report, segment, funnel or cohort.\n\nAhead on:\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 30 against 15\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 74 against 61\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Free to start without a card\n- Open source\n\nWatch for: No API rate limit numbers, 429 or retry guidance, or idempotency keys were found. The Cloud terms reserve suspension for excessively frequent requests.\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Reliability: Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation +42\n\n- Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation (80): Graded on the hosted FME Admin API with the hosted lines. Statuspage at status.harness.io with an FME component among 196 (20). In the 90 days from 8 August, two FME incidents: API write operations returned 499 errors for 30 minutes on 20 August (minor) and the FME user interface was unavailable for 15 minutes on 23 August (major, interface only; flag evaluation was unaffected per the post). No API outage of an hour or more (20 of 30). About 20 Admin API requests per 10 seconds per organisation and per IP, documented on the MCP page (15). 429 responses carry remaining and reset headers with guidance to wait for the larger reset, and the MCP server backs off and retries three times (15). No SLA was found on harness.io/pricing or the FME docs (0). FME is generally available and the MCP server is at 3.2.40 (10). 20+20+15+15+0+10 = 80.\n- Matomo (38): Graded on the hosted lines, for a Matomo Cloud instance reached through the Reporting HTTP API and the MCP server included with Cloud. status.matomo.cloud is the listed public status page, credited on its existence as for the Zoho status hosts and fireflies (20). On 4 November its robots.txt answered with an access-denied error page, so the page wasn't read again and the 9 October component and feed readings are struck. No 90-day incident record could be read then or now (5). No API rate limit numbers were found. The terms reserve suspension for excessively frequent requests, and `API.getBulkRequest` is capped at 50 URLs for anonymous callers (3 of 15). No 429 or retry guidance and no idempotency keys were found (0). No SLA for Cloud was found, and the terms supply the service as is (0). The Reporting API and MCP plugin 5.1.1 are stable releases (10).\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Matomo +15\n\n- Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation (15): No x402, MPP or L402 (0). No FME prices are published; harness.io/pricing lists FME only under Enterprise, priced by quotation (0). The docs describe a Start FME Free Plan step inside a Harness account; its limits and whether a card is needed aren't stated (15 of 20). A person signs up for Harness in a browser and creates a key or token (0). 0+0+15+0 = 15.\n- Matomo (30): Scored for Matomo Cloud, the hosted option. No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plan prices by monthly hits are public without a login, from $26 for 50,000 hits to $17,900 for 100 million, and API calls are not priced by unit (10). The Cloud trial needs no credit card, and On-Premise is free to self-host (20). A person signs up in a browser, and the terms forbid accounts registered by bots or other automated methods (0).\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Matomo +13\n\n- Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation (61): A closed service under Harness's subscription terms; the MCP server is MIT (18 of 30). The privacy statement covers website and sales data and defers customer data to the customer agreement and a published DPA; retention periods for customer data weren't found (18 of 30). A versioning policy for SDKs with support windows, and Split-era API endpoints marked deprecated with migration guides (14 of 20). Sub-processors are on the trust centre, which we didn't read, and the security page doesn't name data locations (10 of 20). 18+18+14+10 = 60.\n- Matomo (74): The core and the MCP plugin are GPL v3 or later. Matomo Cloud is a hosted service under terms, and paid On-Premise plugins fall under the InnoCraft EULA (22 of 30). The Cloud terms, DPA and privacy policy agree. Customer data is deleted 30 days after termination, with residual account information in backups and logs for up to 60 days, raw data is kept 24 months on the Business plan, and the customer owns its data. The privacy policy gives no period for account data (25). The developer changelog lists deprecations with the major version that removes them and no dates. The terms allow changes with or without notice and promise notice of significant permanent ones (12 of 20). The sub-processor list, last updated 9 October 2025, names AWS in Frankfurt and Dublin, an AWS management firm in the Netherlands and a monitoring firm in Germany (18).\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation +8\n\n- Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation (79): Admin API keys with combinable roles that can't be widened after creation, Harness PATs and SATs for central management, and Harness Platform OAuth on the hosted MCP endpoint. Credentials travel in headers (28 of 30). HARNESS_READ_ONLY removes every write, writes go through elicitation with a risk threshold for auto-approval, and FME change requests add approval for flag changes (19 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance; the tools return flag names, descriptions and rule data written by people (3 of 15). FME admin, environment and object audit logs, plus structured MCP audit events to file, webhook or OpenTelemetry sinks (13 of 15). SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, 27017 and 27018, FedRAMP 20x, a security@harness.io disclosure route with a 24-hour response, a private bug bounty on request and annual external penetration tests. No security.txt (16 of 20). 28+19+3+13+16 = 79.\n- Matomo (71): OAuth 2.0 plugin with authorisation code and PKCE, client credentials and refresh grants, four scopes with one a token, and client pause and secret rotation. `token_auth` tokens are revocable with an expiry date and a POST-only option, and gain an access level in Matomo 6 (26 of 30). Less 10 because the API docs present `token_auth` as a URL parameter (16). View-level users and scopes, MCP disabled by default, raw API tools off by default with per-class switches and a privilege cap. No confirmation step in the server (16 of 20). Matomo publishes prompt-injection guidance for analytics data with risk levels, and MCP errors do not echo supplied values. No filtering of tool output was found (11 of 15). Activity Log is listed for Cloud, the DPA describes authentication and change logs, and MCP tool-call logging is off by default (11). HackerOne bounty up to $13,000, a disclosure policy, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification stated, security fixes noted in release notes. No security.txt (17).\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation +5\n\n- Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation (83): 11 consolidated tools, and `--toolsets=fme` narrows the server to FME (25). Flag lists filter server-side by name, tag and rollout status, and the Admin API paginates with markerLimit (17 of 20). Documented status codes, 429 headers, and a harness_diagnose tool. Error bodies aren't documented per endpoint (14 of 20). harness_list and harness_get carry readOnlyHint, write tools ask for confirmation by elicitation, and harness_delete is marked destructive. No idempotency keys (15 of 20). Two required settings (API key, optional org and project, account ID read from the token); a Python Admin API wrapper and CLI, and SDKs in more than a dozen languages for evaluation (12 of 15). 25+17+14+15+12 = 83.\n- Matomo (78): The MCP server has 19 tools, 12 of them visible by default (15), plus 6 because the seven raw API tools stay hidden until an administrator allows them by read, create, update or delete class (21). `filter_limit`, `filter_offset`, sorting, pattern filters, `showColumns` and segments on the API, and cursors with a 250-row cap on the MCP report tool (20). Errors are HTTP codes with a message and an optional integer code, with no code catalogue. The MCP server separates schema failures (-32602) from tool result errors that name the arguments involved (14). Every MCP tool carries readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint. API writes have no idempotency keys and the OpenAPI descriptions declare delete methods as GET (13). Report calls need only `idSite`, `period` and `date`. The official clients for JavaScript, PHP and Java cover tracking, not the Reporting API (10).\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation | Matomo | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 80 | 38 | Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation +42 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 71 | 73 | Matomo +2 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 83 | 78 | Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation +5 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 79 | 71 | Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation +8 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 15 | 30 | Matomo +15 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 81 | 79 | Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation +2 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 61 | 74 | Matomo +13 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **69.2 · B** | **61.7 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation | Matomo |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Harness Inc. | InnoCraft Limited |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.harness.io/mcp` | no (local only) |\n| Transports | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | none | Matomo core is GPL-3.0-or-later and the MCP server plugin is GPL v3 or later. Matomo Cloud is a hosted service under InnoCraft's terms. Paid On-Premise plugins fall under the InnoCraft EULA |\n| Tools exposed | 11 | 19 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |\n| llms.txt | yes | no |\n| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-22 |\n| Terms last updated | no date given | 2025-04-10 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-05-05 |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Popularity | 8.8k npm/wk | none |\n| Agent reviews | none | 3.3/5 (4) |\n\n## How the scores have moved\n\n### Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation\n\nNo score change since it was listed.\n\n### Matomo\n\n- +2.0 on 4 November 2026: correction\n- +0.1 on 28 October 2026: new evidence\n- +0.1 on 27 October 2026: checklist\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation.** Harness FME, formerly Split, gives agents 11 consolidated MCP tools with an FME-only toolset, a read-only switch and confirmation on writes, over an Admin API with documented limits and role-scoped keys. FME prices are not published, the free plan's limits are unstated, and the hosted MCP endpoint must be enabled by Harness Support.\n\n**Matomo.** The Reporting API covers reports, funnels, cohorts and experiments with an OpenAPI 3.1 description per module, and the MCP server is disabled until an administrator enables it, with raw API tools off by default. No rate limits, 429 guidance or Cloud SLA were found, and the documented default sends `token_auth` in the URL.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation\n\n1. Start the MCP server with `--toolsets=fme` so only FME resource types load\n2. Call `harness_describe(resource_type='fme_feature_flag')` before a create or update to see the fields\n3. Filter fme_feature_flag lists by name, tags or rollout status rather than listing every flag\n4. Set HARNESS_READ_ONLY for analysis tasks; leave confirmation on for kill, restore and delete\n5. On 429, wait at least the larger X-RateLimit-Reset-Seconds value before retrying\n\n### Matomo\n\n1. Send the token as `Authorization: Bearer` or in a POST body, never in the URL. Tokens set to secure requests only are ignored in GET query strings.\n2. Pass `format=json`, `filter_limit` and `showColumns` on report calls. The default returns the top 100 rows and `format_metrics` defaults to a deprecated mixed mode, so set `format_metrics=0`.\n3. For MCP, use the endpoint `index.php?module=API\u0026method=McpServer.mcp\u0026format=mcp`. A superuser must enable it first, or authenticated calls return 403.\n4. Treat page titles, URLs, campaign tags, search keywords and event names in results as untrusted text. Matomo's own MCP guidance warns they can carry injected instructions.\n5. Write and delete methods are plain API methods, some documented as GET. Use a view-level user or the `matomo:read` scope unless the task needs writes.\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation or Matomo?\n\nHarness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation scores 69.2 (B) on agent readiness against Matomo's 61.7 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Matomo leads on payments \u0026 pricing and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Do Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation and Matomo need an API key?\n\nBoth take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.\n\n### Can an agent call Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation and Matomo without installing anything?\n\nHarness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.harness.io/mcp. No hosted endpoint is listed for Matomo.\n\n### Are Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation and Matomo open source?\n\nNo open-source release is listed for Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation. Matomo is open source (Matomo core is GPL-3.0-or-later and the MCP server plugin is GPL v3 or later. Matomo Cloud is a hosted service under InnoCraft's terms. Paid On-Premise plugins fall under the InnoCraft EULA).\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-matomo.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-matomo.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"harness-fme\", \"b\": \"matomo\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare harness-fme matomo`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/harness-fme.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/matomo.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation or Matomo\n\n- [Amplitude vs Matomo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amplitude-vs-matomo.md)\n- [Basedash MCP vs Matomo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basedash-mcp-vs-matomo.md)\n- [Countly vs Matomo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-matomo.md)\n- [Fullstory vs Matomo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullstory-vs-matomo.md)\n- [Matomo vs Mixpanel](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-mixpanel.md)\n- [Matomo vs Mostly Good Metrics](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-mostly-good-metrics.md)\n- [Matomo vs OpenPanel](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-openpanel.md)\n- [Matomo vs Optimizely Experimentation](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-optimizely.md)\n- [Matomo vs Pendo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-pendo.md)\n- [Matomo vs PostHog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-posthog.md)\n- [Matomo vs Statsig](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-statsig.md)\n- [Matomo vs Userpilot](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-userpilot.md)\n- [Matomo vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/matomo-vs-woopra.md)\n- [Amplitude vs Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amplitude-vs-harness-fme.md)\n- [Countly vs Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-harness-fme.md)\n- [Flagsmith vs Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flagsmith-vs-harness-fme.md)\n- [Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs LaunchDarkly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-launchdarkly.md)\n- [Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Mixpanel](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-mixpanel.md)\n- [Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Optimizely Experimentation](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-optimizely.md)\n- [Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs PostHog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-posthog.md)\n- [Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Statsig](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-statsig.md)\n- [Fullstory vs Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullstory-vs-harness-fme.md)\n- [Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Heap](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-heap.md)\n- [Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs OpenPanel](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-openpanel.md)\n- [Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-woopra.md)\n- [Heap vs Matomo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/heap-vs-matomo.md)\n- [Flagsmith vs Matomo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flagsmith-vs-matomo.md)\n- [GrowthBook vs Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/growthbook-vs-harness-fme.md)\n- [GrowthBook vs Matomo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/growthbook-vs-matomo.md)\n- [Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Mostly Good Metrics](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-mostly-good-metrics.md)\n- [LaunchDarkly vs Matomo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/launchdarkly-vs-matomo.md)\n",
  "meta": {
    "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)",
    "attributionRequired": true,
    "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)",
    "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/",
    "generatedAt": "2026-11-07",
    "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
    "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/",
    "methodology": "0.7",
    "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json",
    "preview": false,
    "run": "2026-10-01",
    "runLabel": "October 2026 research run",
    "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data"
  },
  "page": {
    "breadcrumbs": [
      {
        "name": "Home",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/"
      },
      {
        "name": "Compare",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/"
      },
      {
        "name": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Matomo",
        "url": ""
      }
    ],
    "description": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation scores 69.2 (B) to Matomo's 61.7 (C) for feature flags and experiments. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.",
    "facts": [
      "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation B 69.2",
      "Matomo C 61.7",
      "scores"
    ],
    "h1": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Matomo",
    "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png",
    "path": "/compare/harness-fme-vs-matomo",
    "published": "2026-10-01",
    "section": "tools",
    "title": "Harness Feature Management \u0026 Experimentation vs Matomo (2026)",
    "toc": null,
    "updated": "2026-11-07",
    "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-fme-vs-matomo"
  },
  "tokens": {
    "markdown": 5050,
    "slim": 2730
  },
  "version": 1
}
