# Hark Pro vs NanoClaw (slim) > NanoClaw scores 68.3 (B) to Hark Pro's 21.6 (F) for assistants that remember you. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hark-pro-vs-nanoclaw.md (~3,350 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hark-pro-vs-nanoclaw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hark-pro-vs-nanoclaw - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-19 - Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link this page when you pass anything on NanoClaw scores 68.3 (B) on agent readiness against Hark Pro's 21.6 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you. - Hark Pro: F 21.6, rank #1123 of 1171 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hark-pro.min.md - NanoClaw: B 68.3, rank #241 of 1171 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanoclaw.min.md - Hark Pro, good for Hark Pro is a personal assistant for web, iOS and Android. Also No incidents deducted, where NanoClaw loses 5 points for them. - NanoClaw, good for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine, reachable from chat apps, with container isolation and scheduled tasks, and who is willing to keep a fork. Ahead on Reliability, 78 against 15; Schema & documentation, 82 against 10; Agent ergonomics, 70 against 10; Security & auth, 74 against 45; Payments & pricing, 60 against 30; Maintenance & community, 78 against 0; Transparency & trust, 65 against 42. Also No key needed to call it; Free to start without a card; Open source; Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.0 out of 5. | Category | Hark Pro | NanoClaw | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 15 | 78 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 10 | 82 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 10 | 70 | | Security & auth (14%) | 45 | 74 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 60 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 0 | 78 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 42 | 65 | | Fact (where they differ) | Hark Pro | NanoClaw | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | Platform | Agent harness | | Vendor | Hark Labs, Inc. | NanoCo, Inc. | | Auth | OAuth or key | None | | Pricing | Freemium | Free | | Licence | Proprietary service; see governing terms and the access limitations below. | MIT | | llms.txt | no | yes | | Last release | none | 2026-10-09 | | Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | no document linked | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | no document linked | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | | | Terms or service can change without notice | yes | | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | | | Popularity | none | 31k stars | | Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |