# Gumloop vs n8n API + MCP > Gumloop scores 61.6 (C) on agent readiness against n8n API + MCP's 53.1 (D), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. n8n API + MCP leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do automation workflows.… - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-n8n - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-n8n.md (~2,250 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-n8n.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-n8n.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-09 Gumloop scores 61.6 (C) on agent readiness against n8n API + MCP's 53.1 (D), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. n8n API + MCP leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do automation workflows. - Gumloop: grade C, 61.6/100, rank #419 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gumloop.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/gumloop.json - n8n API + MCP: grade D, 53.1/100, rank #638 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/n8n.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/n8n.json ## Which one, for what ### Gumloop (C) Good for: A team that wants hosted agents with connectors, approvals and triggers, driven or configured by an outside agent through the API or MCP server. Ahead on: - Reliability, 82 against 40 Also in its favour: - A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install Watch for: API keys and the `gumloop_api` OAuth scope need the Pro plan at $37 a month. The 14-day trial needs a card ### n8n API + MCP (D) Good for: A team that wants to self-host and let an agent build and run workflows with a large node library. Ahead on: - Schema & documentation, 92 against 83 - Agent ergonomics, 75 against 66 - Security & auth, 70 against 50 - Payments & pricing, 30 against 20 - Transparency & trust, 80 against 57 Watch for: 24 critical advisories from December 2025 to May 2026, and CVE-2025-68613 was exploited in the wild ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Gumloop | n8n API + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 82 | 40 | Gumloop +42 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 83 | 92 | n8n API + MCP +9 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 66 | 75 | n8n API + MCP +9 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 50 | 70 | n8n API + MCP +20 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 20 | 30 | n8n API + MCP +10 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 77 | 80 | n8n API + MCP +3 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 57 | 80 | n8n API + MCP +23 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | -12 | | | **Total** | | **61.6 · C** | **53.1 · D** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Gumloop | n8n API + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | AgentHub Inc. | n8n | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.gumloop.com/api/v1` | no (local only) | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Paid | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Proprietary service under Gumloop's terms of service. The Python SDK and CLI repository and the npm package are Apache-2.0 | Sustainable Use License (fair-code, source-available) | | Tools exposed | none | 54 | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-01 | | Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read | | Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-09-28 | | Customer content may train models | yes | couldn't be read | | Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Popularity | 188 npm/wk, 2.9k PyPI/wk | 206k stars, 113k npm/wk | | Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Gumloop.** Gumloop's REST API has a public OpenAPI file with 105 operations, Markdown docs and a changelog with 28 dated releases since 9 July 2026. API keys need the $37 Pro plan, the trial needs a card, the key can travel in the URL, and self-serve content may be used to train Gumloop's models. **n8n API + MCP.** OpenAPI 3.0 spec with 208 operations, and Markdown docs plus llms.txt. 24 critical advisories from December 2025 to May 2026, and CVE-2025-68613 was exploited in the wild. ## Before you call either ### Gumloop 1. Send the key as `Authorization: Bearer` and, for a personal key, add the `x-auth-key` header with the user ID. Do not put `api_key` in the URL 2. Create sessions with `POST /agents/{agent_id}/sessions`, then poll `GET /sessions/{session_id}`. A 202 means processing or queued, and the reply is not in the response 3. Supply your own `session_id` when creating a session. A repeat returns 409, which makes a retry safe 4. For streamed output send the same body with `stream: true` to `ws.gumloop.com`. `api.gumloop.com` answers 400 to it 5. Treat a webhook trigger URL as a password. It returns `{"success": true}` at once and never carries the agent's output ### n8n API + MCP 1. Check the instance version before trusting it. Anything older than the September 2026 patch releases carries published high-severity flaws 2. Ask for only the OAuth scopes the job needs. `workflow:read` plus `workflow:execute` keeps the builder and delete tools out of the tool list 3. Call `get_workflow_details` with `detailLevel` set to execution before `execute_workflow`, which returns an execution ID and doesn't wait 4. Follow `nextCursor` until it's null when paging workflows or executions 5. On Cloud trial accounts `/api/v1` won't answer. Use the MCP server or a paid plan ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Gumloop or n8n API + MCP? Gumloop scores 61.6 (C) on agent readiness against n8n API + MCP's 53.1 (D), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. n8n API + MCP leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. ### Do Gumloop and n8n API + MCP need an API key? Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call Gumloop and n8n API + MCP without installing anything? Gumloop has a hosted endpoint at https://api.gumloop.com/api/v1. No hosted endpoint is listed for n8n API + MCP. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-n8n.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-n8n.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "gumloop", "b": "n8n"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare gumloop n8n` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/gumloop.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/n8n.json ## Other comparisons with Gumloop or n8n API + MCP - [Activepieces API + MCP vs Gumloop](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-gumloop.md) - [Activepieces API + MCP vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-n8n.md) - [Gumloop vs Kestra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-kestra.md) - [Gumloop vs Make API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-make.md) - [Gumloop vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-paragon.md) - [Gumloop vs Pipedream API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-pipedream.md) - [Gumloop vs Microsoft Power Automate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-power-automate.md) - [Gumloop vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-tray.md) - [Gumloop vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-windmill.md) - [Gumloop vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-workato.md) - [Kestra vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-n8n.md) - [Make API + MCP vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-n8n.md) - [n8n API + MCP vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/n8n-vs-paragon.md) - [n8n API + MCP vs Pipedream API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/n8n-vs-pipedream.md) - [n8n API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/n8n-vs-power-automate.md) - [n8n API + MCP vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/n8n-vs-tray.md) - [n8n API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/n8n-vs-windmill.md) - [n8n API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/n8n-vs-workato.md)