# Groq Speech-to-Text vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe (slim)

> Groq Speech-to-Text scores 71.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Mistral Voxtral Transcribe's 64.1 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Mistral Voxtral Transcribe leads on schema & documentation. Both do speech stt. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by…

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-speech-to-text-vs-mistral-voxtral-transcribe.md (~2,700 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-speech-to-text-vs-mistral-voxtral-transcribe.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-speech-to-text-vs-mistral-voxtral-transcribe
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Groq Speech-to-Text scores 71.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Mistral Voxtral Transcribe's 64.1 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Mistral Voxtral Transcribe leads on schema & documentation. Both do speech stt.

- Groq Speech-to-Text: BB 71.8, rank #113 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/groq-speech-to-text.min.md
- Mistral Voxtral Transcribe: B 64.1, rank #329 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mistral-voxtral-transcribe.min.md
- Groq Speech-to-Text, good for Suited to cheap, fast transcription of recorded files in many languages, and to agents that already hold a Groq key or use an OpenAI-compatible client. Ahead on Reliability, 90 against 53; Security & auth, 79 against 70. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Free to start without a card; No incidents deducted, where Mistral Voxtral Transcribe loses 3 points for them.
- Mistral Voxtral Transcribe, good for Suited to low-cost batch transcription with diarisation in the 13 supported languages, and to live captions or voice agents that can run without speaker labels. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 85 against 58.

| Category | Groq Speech-to-Text | Mistral Voxtral Transcribe |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 90 | 53 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 58 | 85 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 75 | 77 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 79 | 70 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 68 | 66 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 85 | 82 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Groq Speech-to-Text | Mistral Voxtral Transcribe |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Groq | Mistral AI |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.groq.com/openai/v1` | `https://api.mistral.ai/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, websocket |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under the Groq Services Agreement. The SDKs are Apache-2.0 and the Whisper weights are published by OpenAI on Hugging Face | Proprietary hosted service under Mistral's commercial terms. Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime weights and the SDKs are Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-26 | 2026-02-04 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-06-22 | 2026-09-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-11-12 | 2026-09-03 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 621 stars | 773 stars |