# Grok Bot vs PicoClaw (slim)

> PicoClaw and Grok Bot score within a point of each other for assistant proactive, 46.1 and 45.2 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-picoclaw.md (~2,650 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-picoclaw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-picoclaw
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-12

PicoClaw and Grok Bot score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 46.1 (D) and 45.2 (E). Grok Bot leads on security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do assistant proactive.

- Grok Bot: E 45.2, rank #893 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/grok-bot.min.md
- PicoClaw: D 46.1, rank #879 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/picoclaw.min.md
- Grok Bot, good for A person or team already paying for Cursor or SuperGrok who wants named assistants that keep working on a cloud computer, with routines and Slack or X entry points, and who will write approval rules. Ahead on Security & auth, 68 against 51; Transparency & trust, 66 against 56. Also No incidents deducted, where PicoClaw loses 7 points for them.
- PicoClaw, good for A person who wants a chat-app assistant on a cheap Linux board, an old Android phone or a home server, with reminders, web search and file memory, and who accepts running software its maker calls pre-production. Ahead on Reliability, 54 against 40; Schema & documentation, 51 against 40; Agent ergonomics, 66 against 50; Payments & pricing, 60 against 25. Also No key needed to call it; Free to start without a card; Open source.

| Category | Grok Bot | PicoClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 40 | 54 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 40 | 51 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 50 | 66 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 68 | 51 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 25 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 20 | 22 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 66 | 56 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Grok Bot | PicoClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | SpaceXAI and Cursor (Anysphere, Inc.) | Sipeed |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Licence | Proprietary | MIT |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | none | 2026-07-03 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-03 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-29 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | none | 30k stars |