# Grok Bot vs OpenClaw (slim)

> OpenClaw scores 67.1 (B) to Grok Bot's 45.2 (E) for assistant proactive. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-openclaw.md (~2,600 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-openclaw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-openclaw
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-12

OpenClaw scores 67.1 (B) on agent readiness against Grok Bot's 45.2 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistant proactive.

- Grok Bot: E 45.2, rank #893 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/grok-bot.min.md
- OpenClaw: B 67.1, rank #270 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openclaw.min.md
- Grok Bot, good for A person or team already paying for Cursor or SuperGrok who wants named assistants that keep working on a cloud computer, with routines and Slack or X entry points, and who will write approval rules. Also No incidents deducted, where OpenClaw loses 8 points for them.
- OpenClaw, good for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine across many chat apps, with their choice of model and files they can read and delete. Ahead on Reliability, 75 against 40; Schema & documentation, 84 against 40; Agent ergonomics, 77 against 50; Security & auth, 74 against 68; Payments & pricing, 60 against 25; Maintenance & community, 86 against 20. Also Open source.

| Category | Grok Bot | OpenClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 40 | 75 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 40 | 84 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 50 | 77 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 68 | 74 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 25 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 20 | 86 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 66 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Grok Bot | OpenClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | SpaceXAI and Cursor (Anysphere, Inc.) | OpenClaw Foundation |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Licence | Proprietary | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-12 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-03 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-29 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | none | 392k stars |