# Grok Bot vs NanoClaw (slim)

> NanoClaw scores 68.3 (B) to Grok Bot's 45.2 (E) for assistant proactive. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-nanoclaw.md (~2,650 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-nanoclaw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-nanoclaw
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-12

NanoClaw scores 68.3 (B) on agent readiness against Grok Bot's 45.2 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistant proactive.

- Grok Bot: E 45.2, rank #893 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/grok-bot.min.md
- NanoClaw: B 68.3, rank #229 of 986 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanoclaw.min.md
- Grok Bot, good for A person or team already paying for Cursor or SuperGrok who wants named assistants that keep working on a cloud computer, with routines and Slack or X entry points, and who will write approval rules. Also No incidents deducted, where NanoClaw loses 5 points for them.
- NanoClaw, good for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine, reachable from chat apps, with container isolation and scheduled tasks, and who is willing to keep a fork. Ahead on Reliability, 78 against 40; Schema & documentation, 82 against 40; Agent ergonomics, 70 against 50; Security & auth, 74 against 68; Payments & pricing, 60 against 25; Maintenance & community, 78 against 20. Also No key needed to call it; Free to start without a card; Open source.

| Category | Grok Bot | NanoClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 40 | 78 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 40 | 82 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 50 | 70 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 68 | 74 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 25 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 20 | 78 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 66 | 65 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Grok Bot | NanoClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | SpaceXAI and Cursor (Anysphere, Inc.) | NanoCo, Inc. |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Licence | Proprietary | MIT |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-09 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-03 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-29 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | none | 31k stars |