# Graphiti vs Supermemory API + MCP (slim)

> Supermemory API + MCP has a score of 63.6 (B) against Graphiti's 53.3 (D). Both do memory store. The largest gap is security & auth, 31 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-supermemory.md (~1,400 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-supermemory.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-supermemory
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Supermemory API + MCP has a score of 63.6 (B) against Graphiti's 53.3 (D). Both do memory store. The largest gap is security & auth, 31 points.

- Graphiti: D 53.3, rank #333 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/graphiti.min.md
- Supermemory API + MCP: B 63.6, rank #201 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/supermemory.min.md
- Pick Graphiti for payments & pricing (+30), transparency & trust (+22). Pick Supermemory API + MCP for reliability (+15), schema & documentation (+14), agent ergonomics (+22), security & auth (+31), maintenance & community (+20).

| Category | Graphiti | Supermemory API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 50 | 65 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 71 | 85 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 51 | 73 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 23 | 54 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 65 | 85 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 71 | 49 |