# Graphiti vs Memory (MCP reference server) (slim) > Memory and Graphiti score within a point of each other for agent memory, 54.2 and 53.3 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-memory-reference-server.md (~2,350 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-memory-reference-server.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-memory-reference-server - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-01 Memory (MCP reference server) and Graphiti score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 54.2 (C) and 53.3 (D). Graphiti leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do agent memory. - Graphiti: D 53.3, rank #710 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/graphiti.min.md - Memory (MCP reference server): C 54.2, rank #690 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/memory-reference-server.min.md - Graphiti, good for Teams that want Zep's temporal graph model on their own infrastructure and can run a graph database. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 71 against 60; Maintenance & community, 65 against 43. - Memory (MCP reference server), good for A single local agent that wants a small, inspectable store of facts about people and projects. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 67 against 51; Security & auth, 32 against 23. | Category | Graphiti | Memory (MCP reference server) | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 50 | 52 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 71 | 60 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 51 | 67 | | Security & auth (14%) | 23 | 32 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 60 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 65 | 43 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 71 | 72 | | Fact (where they differ) | Graphiti | Memory (MCP reference server) | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | Agent framework | MCP server | | Vendor | Zep | MCP project (reference servers) | | Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio | stdio | | Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT and Apache-2.0 | | Tools exposed | 13 | 9 | | llms.txt | yes | no | | Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-08-31 | | Terms last updated | no document linked | 2021-09-08 | | Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2023-03-15 | | Customer content may train models | | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | | not found in the text | | Terms restrict benchmarking | | not found in the text | | Terms or service can change without notice | | not found in the text | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | | not found in the text | | Popularity | 29k stars, 151k PyPI/wk | 90k stars, 136k npm/wk |