# Graphiti vs Hindsight > Graphiti has a score of 53.3 (D) against Hindsight's 50.4 (D). Both do memory store. The largest gap is security & auth, 35 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-hindsight - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-hindsight.md (~1,350 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-hindsight.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-hindsight.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 Graphiti has a score of 53.3 (D) against Hindsight's 50.4 (D). Both do memory store. The largest gap is security & auth, 35 points. - Graphiti: grade D, 53.3/100, rank #333 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/graphiti.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/graphiti.json - Hindsight: grade D, 50.4/100, rank #359 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hindsight.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hindsight.json ## Which one, for what Pick Graphiti for reliability (+25), payments & pricing (+30), transparency & trust (+23). Pick Hindsight for agent ergonomics (+6), security & auth (+35), maintenance & community (+15). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Graphiti | Hindsight | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 50 | 25 | Graphiti +25 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 71 | 68 | Graphiti +3 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 51 | 57 | Hindsight +6 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 23 | 58 | Hindsight +35 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 30 | Graphiti +30 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 65 | 80 | Hindsight +15 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 71 | 48 | Graphiti +23 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **53.3 · D** | **50.4 · D** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Graphiti | Hindsight | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | Agent framework | HTTP API | | Vendor | Zep | Vectorize | | Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.hindsight.vectorize.io` | | Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | None | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Free | Pay per use | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT | | Tools exposed | 13 | 27 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | no | | MCP registry | not listed | not listed | | Last release | 2026-09-08 | 2026-09-29 | | Popularity | 29k stars, 151k PyPI/wk | 43k stars, 44k npm/wk, 227k PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Graphiti.** Apache-2.0, with FalkorDB, Neo4j or Amazon Neptune as the store. Every add runs LLM extraction, so ingestion costs tokens and time. **Hindsight.** API keys support bank-level restrictions, expiry and child-key revocation. Retain ingestion costs $10 per million tokens. ## Before you call either ### Graphiti 1. Set OPENAI_API_KEY (or another provider's key) and MODEL_NAME before starting the MCP server 2. Use search_memory_facts for facts and search_nodes for entities instead of reading whole episodes 3. Never call clear_graph to fix one fact. Use delete_episode or delete_entity_edge 4. Pass group_ids on every search and add so one user's graph doesn't leak into another's 5. Call get_status to check the database connection before a long ingest ### Hindsight 1. Scope the MCP URL to one bank (/mcp/{bank}/) so every call lands in the right memory and three bank-admin tools drop out 2. Use recall for lookups and keep reflect ($0.05 a call) for questions that need reasoning 3. Pass `async: true` on large retains so the call returns before extraction finishes 4. Treat HTTP 402 as out of credit and 403 as a key that can't reach that bank ## Other comparisons with Graphiti or Hindsight - [Cognee vs Graphiti](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cognee-vs-graphiti.md) - [Cognee vs Hindsight](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cognee-vs-hindsight.md) - [Graphiti vs Honcho](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-honcho.md) - [Graphiti vs LocalGhost](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-localghost.md) - [Graphiti vs Mem0 Platform + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-mem0.md) - [Graphiti vs Supermemory API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-supermemory.md) - [Graphiti vs Zep](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphiti-vs-zep.md) - [Hindsight vs Honcho](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hindsight-vs-honcho.md) - [Hindsight vs LocalGhost](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hindsight-vs-localghost.md) - [Hindsight vs Mem0 Platform + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hindsight-vs-mem0.md) - [Hindsight vs Supermemory API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hindsight-vs-supermemory.md) - [Hindsight vs Zep](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hindsight-vs-zep.md)