# Graphicle vs Graphiti (slim) > Graphicle scores 69.8 (B) to Graphiti's 53.3 (D) for memory search. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphicle-vs-graphiti.md (~2,150 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphicle-vs-graphiti.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/graphicle-vs-graphiti - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-15 - Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link this page when you pass anything on Graphicle scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against Graphiti's 53.3 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Graphiti leads on maintenance & community. Both do memory search. - Graphicle: B 69.8, rank #178 of 1094 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/graphicle.min.md - Graphiti: D 53.3, rank #761 of 1094 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/graphiti.min.md - Graphicle, good for A developer who wants one local tool that gives Claude Code, Codex or Cursor both code structure and project memory with citations. Ahead on Reliability, 63 against 50; Schema & documentation, 83 against 71; Agent ergonomics, 86 against 51; Security & auth, 69 against 23. Also Free to start without a card. - Graphiti, good for Teams that want Zep's temporal graph model on their own infrastructure and can run a graph database. Ahead on Maintenance & community, 65 against 48. Also No key needed to call it. | Category | Graphicle | Graphiti | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 63 | 50 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 83 | 71 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 86 | 51 | | Security & auth (14%) | 69 | 23 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 60 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 48 | 65 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 68 | 71 | | Fact (where they differ) | Graphicle | Graphiti | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | MCP server | Agent framework | | Vendor | KarLex AI, Inc. | Zep | | Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP, stdio | | Auth | OAuth or key | None | | Tools exposed | 25 | 13 | | llms.txt | no | yes | | Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-09-08 | | Terms last updated | 2025-03-14 | no document linked | | Privacy policy last updated | 2025-03-14 | no document linked | | Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | | | Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | | | Terms or service can change without notice | yes | | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | | | Popularity | 144 stars | 29k stars, 151k PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |