# Granite Switch 4.1 vs Jev > Jev scores 62.1 (B) to Granite Switch 4.1's 59.4 (C) for decision models. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-typesafe-jev - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-typesafe-jev.md (~2,900 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-typesafe-jev.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-typesafe-jev.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (the whole catalogue as tools, no key) - Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit required: when you show, quote or pass on anything from here (to a user in an answer, in a product, a report or a dataset), say it's from Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link the page or API address you took it from. Reviews also credit their author. - Updated: 2026-10-17 Jev scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Granite Switch 4.1's 59.4 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Granite Switch 4.1 leads on payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do decision models. - Granite Switch 4.1: grade C, 59.4/100, rank #601 of 1133. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/granite-switch.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/granite-switch.json - Jev: grade B, 62.1/100, rank #492 of 1133. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/typesafe-jev.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/typesafe-jev.json - Best decision models for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/decision-models/index.md - All 190 decisions comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/decision-models/index.md ## Which one, for what ### Granite Switch 4.1 (C) Good for: A team with a GPU that wants chat, routing decisions, a safety gate and English transcription from one self-hosted endpoint under a permissive licence. Ahead on: - Payments & pricing, 60 against 20 - Maintenance & community, 81 against 64 - Transparency & trust, 74 against 56 Also in its favour: - No key needed to call it - Open source Watch for: The decision adapter has no typed request format. The caller writes the prompt strings and computes single-token label ids with the tokeniser ### Jev (B) Good for: High-volume yes or no answers, labelling, routing and rubric scoring where a probability is more useful than prose, such as ticket triage, invoice checks or picking a tool or skill from a list. Ahead on: - Reliability, 60 against 46 - Schema & documentation, 87 against 55 - Agent ergonomics, 84 against 66 Also in its favour: - A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install Watch for: Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Granite Switch 4.1 | Jev | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 46 | 60 | Jev +14 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 55 | 87 | Jev +32 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 66 | 84 | Jev +18 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 54 | 53 | Granite Switch 4.1 +1 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 20 | Granite Switch 4.1 +40 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 81 | 64 | Granite Switch 4.1 +17 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 74 | 56 | Granite Switch 4.1 +18 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **59.4 · C** | **62.1 · B** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Granite Switch 4.1 | Jev | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | Model API | Model API | | Vendor | IBM | TypeSafe AI | | Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone` | | Transports | HTTP | HTTP | | Auth | None | API key | | Pricing | Free | Pay per use | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Apache 2.0 for the weights, the adapters and the repository | Proprietary model under TypeSafe's Master Customer Agreement. The Python and TypeScript SDKs are MIT | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | no | yes | | Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-09-26 | | Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given | | Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no date given | | Customer content may train models | | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | | not found in the text | | Terms restrict benchmarking | | yes | | Terms or service can change without notice | | not found in the text | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | | yes | | Popularity | none | 15 stars | | Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Granite Switch 4.1.** One self-hosted Apache 2.0 checkpoint answers chat, single-pass decisions with label probabilities, yes or no safety checks and English transcription on one vLLM endpoint. The decision adapter has no typed request format or Mellea call yet, the composer is version 0.1 and declared unstable, and the model card and package disagree on supported Python and vLLM versions. **Jev.** Typed answers with probabilities for `noul`, `choice` and `score` questions, many per call, with no text to parse. Early access behind a waitlist, with no free tier or free credits found. ## Before you call either ### Granite Switch 4.1 1. Pass `chat_template_kwargs: {"adapter_name": "decision"}` or `"guardian-core"`. Without it the request is ordinary chat on the base model 2. For a decision, send the state and the `### DECISION` question as two user turns, request `logprob_token_ids` for the option labels, and set `max_completion_tokens` to 1 3. Use single-token option labels. Split more than 128 labels into chunks with the identical prompt and apply one softmax over all returned logprobs 4. Parse `guardian-core` answers as JSON, `{"score": "yes"}` or `{"score": "no"}`, where yes means the criterion is met 5. Add authentication before exposing the vLLM server. Neither vLLM nor the checkpoint requires a key by default ### Jev 1. Put every independent question about one state into a single call. They run in parallel and the state is billed once 2. Pin `jev-1.13.0` instead of `jev-latest` once you've tuned confidence thresholds 3. Back off exponentially on 429 and 529. The limits move with demand 4. Keep state to what the decision needs. Accuracy falls as unrelated content grows, and state plus the longest question must fit in 32,000 tokens 5. Treat an answer about user-supplied text as a judgement that hostile text can steer, and cap what one answer can trigger ## Tutorials - [Route a return request with Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/tutorials/typesafe-jev/), for Jev ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Granite Switch 4.1 or Jev? Jev scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Granite Switch 4.1's 59.4 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Granite Switch 4.1 leads on payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. ### Do Granite Switch 4.1 and Jev need an API key? Granite Switch 4.1 needs no key. Jev needs an API key. ### Can an agent call Granite Switch 4.1 and Jev without installing anything? No hosted endpoint is listed for Granite Switch 4.1. Jev has a hosted endpoint at https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone. ### Are Granite Switch 4.1 and Jev open source? Granite Switch 4.1 is open source (Apache 2.0 for the weights, the adapters and the repository). No open-source release is listed for Jev. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-typesafe-jev.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-typesafe-jev.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "granite-switch", "b": "typesafe-jev"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare granite-switch typesafe-jev` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/granite-switch.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/typesafe-jev.json ## Other comparisons with Granite Switch 4.1 or Jev - [Celeris-1 Decision vs Granite Switch 4.1](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/celeris-1-decision-vs-granite-switch.md) - [Celeris-1 Decision vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/celeris-1-decision-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [Clef vs Granite Switch 4.1](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-clef-vs-granite-switch.md) - [Clef vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-clef-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [Laya vs Granite Switch 4.1](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/convai-laya-vs-granite-switch.md) - [Laya vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/convai-laya-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [Decider vs Granite Switch 4.1](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/decider-vs-granite-switch.md) - [Decider vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/decider-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [Decision 3.0 vs Granite Switch 4.1](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/decision-3-vs-granite-switch.md) - [Decision 3.0 vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/decision-3-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [GLiClass vs Granite Switch 4.1](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gliclass-vs-granite-switch.md) - [GLiClass vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gliclass-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs Kev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-jaredpalmer-kev.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs Liquid d1](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-liquid-d1.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs Microsoft-Decision-1](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-microsoft-decision-1.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs Drex 1.5](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-nace-drex.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs OpenAI Decisions API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-openai-decisions-api.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs pplx-decider](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-pplx-decider.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs pplx-decider-flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-pplx-decider-flash.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs ScaleDown](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-scaledown.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs SPEV](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-sprag-spev.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs kettei](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-sqwish-kettei.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs Strands Decider 2B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-strands-decider.md) - [Granite Switch 4.1 vs Vela 2.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-switch-vs-vela.md) - [Kev vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jaredpalmer-kev-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [Liquid d1 vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/liquid-d1-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [Microsoft-Decision-1 vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/microsoft-decision-1-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [Drex 1.5 vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nace-drex-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [OpenAI Decisions API vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-decisions-api-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [pplx-decider-flash vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pplx-decider-flash-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [pplx-decider vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pplx-decider-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [ScaleDown vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/scaledown-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [SPEV vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sprag-spev-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [kettei vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sqwish-kettei-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [Strands Decider 2B vs Jev](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/strands-decider-vs-typesafe-jev.md) - [Jev vs Vela 2.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/typesafe-jev-vs-vela.md) --- Query this catalogue directly over MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (Streamable HTTP, no key). How: https://www.anchorterminal.com/agents/#mcp