# Granite 4.2 3B vs Step 3.7 Flash (slim)

> Granite 4.2 3B and Step 3.7 Flash score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 59.8 and 59.8 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-step-3-7-flash.md (~9,200 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-step-3-7-flash.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-4-2-3b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Granite 4.2 3B and Step 3.7 Flash score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 59.8 (C) and 59.8 (C). Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Granite 4.2 3B: C 59.8, rank #92 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/granite-4-2-3b.min.md
- Step 3.7 Flash: C 59.8, rank #93 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/step-3-7-flash.min.md
- Granite 4.2 3B, good for Agents on small hardware that want a permissive reasoning model for tool calls and coding, with thinking they can switch off Ahead on Reach, 95 against 70; Risk, 55 against 45; Documentation and upkeep, 92 against 39.
- Step 3.7 Flash, good for Teams with a GPU server or a provider account that want an open, long-context agent model with vision

| Category | Granite 4.2 3B | Step 3.7 Flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 95 | 70 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 45 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 92 | 39 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Granite 4.2 3B | Step 3.7 Flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | IBM | StepFun |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (metadata and card; no LICENSE file) |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-06-03 |
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, Granite 4.2 3B +53: Granite 4.2 3B 92 (The card covers everything but a knowledge cut-off (17).); Step 3.7 Flash 39 (Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters, the context and the language (in the metadata) are on the card.)
- Reach, Granite 4.2 3B +25: Granite 4.2 3B 95 (Memory earns the full 30, since IBM's 4-bit MLX build is 2.07 GB and Ollama's Q4_K_M build 2.2 GB, about 2.5 to 2.6 GB with the fifth added.); Step 3.7 Flash 70 (Memory 5, the smallest build at 4 bits is StepFun's IQ4_XS GGUF, 104.99 GB with the 3.97 GB projector, and 108.96 GB × 1.2 = 130.8 GB, over what the reference m…)
- Risk, Granite 4.2 3B +10: Granite 4.2 3B 55 (File safety gets 15 of 25, safetensors only, less 10 because the card's vLLM command loads the repository's parser plugin.); Step 3.7 Flash 45 (File safety 15, safetensors and GGUF only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25).)