# Granite 4.2 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think (slim)

> Granite 4.2 30B scores 61 (C) to Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-olmo-3-7b-think.md (~9,850 tokens) · this version ~880 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-olmo-3-7b-think.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-olmo-3-7b-think
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Granite 4.2 30B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Granite 4.2 30B: C 61, rank #65 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/granite-4-2-30b.min.md
- Olmo 3 7B Think: D 52.3, rank #139 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/olmo-3-7b-think.min.md
- Granite 4.2 30B, good for Agents that want a documented, signed, Apache 2.0 reasoning model with tool calling on a 24 GB card Ahead on Reach, 90 against 75; Agent interface, 85 against 35; Documentation and upkeep, 87 against 52.
- Olmo 3 7B Think, good for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand Ahead on Risk, 75 against 55.

| Category | Granite 4.2 30B | Olmo 3 7B Think |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 75 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 75 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 35 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 87 | 52 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Granite 4.2 30B | Olmo 3 7B Think |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | IBM | Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI) |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card |
| Last release | 2026-09-04 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2024-09-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2025-02-19 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Agent interface, Granite 4.2 30B +50: Granite 4.2 30B 85 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, with roles, tools, tool responses, the thinking switch and low effort.); Olmo 3 7B Think 35 (The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository.)
- Documentation and upkeep, Granite 4.2 30B +35: Granite 4.2 30B 87 (Model card 17, Intended use (best for), limitations (ethical considerations and limitations), architecture, parameters (30B), context length (128K native) and 1…); Olmo 3 7B Think 52 (The model card earns 17, missing only the context length.)
- Risk, Olmo 3 7B Think +20: Granite 4.2 30B 55 (File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25).); Olmo 3 7B Think 75 (File safety earns 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs.)
- Reach, Granite 4.2 30B +15: Granite 4.2 30B 90 (Memory 25, IBM's own 4-bit MLX build granite-4.2-30b-q4-mlx is 16.47 GB, and 16.47 GB × 1.2 = 19.8 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB.); Olmo 3 7B Think 75 (Memory earns the full 30, since Ollama's 4-bit build is 4.5 GB and fits 8 GB (per the 21 October check of Ollama's library).)