# Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5 (slim)

> Granite 4.2 30B scores 61 (C) to LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-longcat-2-5.md (~9,750 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-longcat-2-5.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/granite-4-2-30b-vs-longcat-2-5
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Granite 4.2 30B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Granite 4.2 30B: C 61, rank #65 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/granite-4-2-30b.min.md
- LongCat-2.5: D 50.5, rank #145 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/longcat-2-5.min.md
- Granite 4.2 30B, good for Agents that want a documented, signed, Apache 2.0 reasoning model with tool calling on a 24 GB card Ahead on Reach, 90 against 35; Agent interface, 85 against 75; Documentation and upkeep, 87 against 46.
- LongCat-2.5, good for Operators with NPU clusters, and anyone tracking what the open flagships can do Ahead on Risk, 60 against 55.

| Category | Granite 4.2 30B | LongCat-2.5 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 35 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 60 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 75 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 87 | 46 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Granite 4.2 30B | LongCat-2.5 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | IBM | Meituan (LongCat) |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-04 | 2026-11-10 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |

Why the edge:
- Reach, Granite 4.2 30B +55: Granite 4.2 30B 90 (Memory 25, IBM's own 4-bit MLX build granite-4.2-30b-q4-mlx is 16.47 GB, and 16.47 GB × 1.2 = 19.8 GB, which fits 24 GB but not 16 GB.); LongCat-2.5 35 (Memory 0, the smallest build is Meituan's W4A4 repository, 1,336 GB, and 1,336 GB × 1.2 = 1,603 GB, far above 256 GB.)
- Documentation and upkeep, Granite 4.2 30B +41: Granite 4.2 30B 87 (Model card 17, Intended use (best for), limitations (ethical considerations and limitations), architecture, parameters (30B), context length (128K native) and 1…); LongCat-2.5 46 (Model card 11, Intended use, limitations (the usage considerations), the architecture and the parameter counts are on the card.)
- Agent interface, Granite 4.2 30B +10: Granite 4.2 30B 85 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, with roles, tools, tool responses, the thinking switch and low effort.); LongCat-2.5 75 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,823 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json.)
- Risk, LongCat-2.5 +5: Granite 4.2 30B 55 (File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25).); LongCat-2.5 60 (File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository.)