# GPT4All vs screenpipe (slim)

> screenpipe has a score of 61.1 (C) against GPT4All's 36.3 (F). Both do local inference. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 76 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gpt4all-vs-screenpipe.md (~1,850 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gpt4all-vs-screenpipe.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gpt4all-vs-screenpipe
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

screenpipe has a score of 61.1 (C) against GPT4All's 36.3 (F). Both do local inference. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 76 points.

- GPT4All: F 36.3, rank #438 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gpt4all.min.md
- screenpipe: C 61.1, rank #233 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/screenpipe.min.md
- Pick GPT4All for payments & pricing (+30). Pick screenpipe for reliability (+9), schema & documentation (+41), agent ergonomics (+34), security & auth (+20), maintenance & community (+76), transparency & trust (+16).

| Category | GPT4All | screenpipe |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 56 | 65 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 40 | 81 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 41 | 75 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 28 | 48 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 6 | 82 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 57 | 73 |