# gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B (slim)

> gpt-oss-120b scores 70.2 (BB) to MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gpt-oss-120b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.md (~9,300 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gpt-oss-120b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gpt-oss-120b-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

gpt-oss-120b scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- gpt-oss-120b: BB 70.2, rank #6 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gpt-oss-120b.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B: C 61, rank #76 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.min.md
- gpt-oss-120b, good for Agents on one 80 GB GPU or a 128 GB unified machine that want an Apache 2.0 reasoning model with wide runtime support Ahead on Risk, 95 against 55; Agent interface, 90 against 70. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B, good for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model Ahead on Reach, 95 against 75.

| Category | gpt-oss-120b | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 75 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 95 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 90 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 45 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | gpt-oss-120b | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | OpenAI | OpenBMB |
| Last release | 2025-08-26 | 2026-10-30 |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Risk, gpt-oss-120b +40: gpt-oss-120b 95 (File safety earns 25, safetensors only, with metal/model.bin a raw format and not pickle, and nothing from the repository runs on load.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main r…)
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +20: gpt-oss-120b 75 (Memory earns 10, because the smallest 4-bit build, Ollama's 65 GB gpt-oss:120b, needs about 78 GB with the fifth added, which fits the reference machine but not…); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95 (Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare.)
- Agent interface, gpt-oss-120b +20: gpt-oss-120b 90 (The chat template earns 20, a Jinja file in the repository.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters.)