# gotoHuman vs Permit MCP Gateway (slim)

> Permit MCP Gateway has a score of 54.5 (C) against gotoHuman's 43.9 (E). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is security & auth, 36 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-permit-mcp-gateway.md (~1,450 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-permit-mcp-gateway.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gotohuman-vs-permit-mcp-gateway
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Permit MCP Gateway has a score of 54.5 (C) against gotoHuman's 43.9 (E). Both do hitl approve. The largest gap is security & auth, 36 points.

- gotoHuman: E 43.9, rank #407 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gotohuman.min.md
- Permit MCP Gateway: C 54.5, rank #321 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/permit-mcp-gateway.min.md
- Pick gotoHuman for payments & pricing (+20), maintenance & community (+21), transparency & trust (+10). Pick Permit MCP Gateway for reliability (+27), agent ergonomics (+21), security & auth (+36).

| Category | gotoHuman | Permit MCP Gateway |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 20 | 47 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 49 | 53 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 62 | 83 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 44 | 80 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 10 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 64 | 43 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 55 | 45 |