# GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B (slim)

> GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) to Ornith-1.5-9B's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-ornith-1-5-9b.md (~6,050 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-ornith-1-5-9b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/glm-4-7-flash-vs-ornith-1-5-9b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

GLM-4.7-Flash scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-9B's 61 (C), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-9B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- GLM-4.7-Flash: B 63, rank #26 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/glm-4-7-flash.min.md
- Ornith-1.5-9B: C 61, rank #44 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ornith-1-5-9b.min.md
- GLM-4.7-Flash, good for Agents and developers who want a small, permissively licensed tool-calling model on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, in almost any runtime Ahead on Risk, 55 against 50. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.3 out of 5.
- Ornith-1.5-9B, good for Local coding and terminal agents on a laptop or a single consumer GPU, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required Ahead on Reach, 95 against 80.

| Category | GLM-4.7-Flash | Ornith-1.5-9B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 80 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 50 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 28 | 31 |

| Fact (where they differ) | GLM-4.7-Flash | Ornith-1.5-9B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | Ornith |
| Last release | 2026-01-29 | 2026-08-23 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |