# GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-397B (slim)

> GLM-4.5-Air and Ornith-1.5-397B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 59.1 and 59 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/glm-4-5-air-vs-ornith-1-5-397b.md (~6,050 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/glm-4-5-air-vs-ornith-1-5-397b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/glm-4-5-air-vs-ornith-1-5-397b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

GLM-4.5-Air and Ornith-1.5-397B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 59.1 (C) and 59 (C). Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- GLM-4.5-Air: C 59.1, rank #62 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/glm-4-5-air.min.md
- Ornith-1.5-397B: C 59, rank #64 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ornith-1-5-397b.min.md
- GLM-4.5-Air, good for Agents with two to four datacentre GPUs, or a provider account, who want a permissively licensed English and Chinese tool-calling model with wide runtime support. Ahead on Risk, 65 against 50. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.0 out of 5.
- Ornith-1.5-397B, good for A self-hosted frontier-scale coding agent on an 8-GPU server, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required

| Category | GLM-4.5-Air | Ornith-1.5-397B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 65 | 65 |
| Risk (20%) | 65 | 50 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 38 | 36 |

| Fact (where they differ) | GLM-4.5-Air | Ornith-1.5-397B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | Ornith |
| Last release | 2025-08-11 | 2026-08-23 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |