# GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna M.1 (slim)

> GLM-4.5-Air scores 59.1 (C) to Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/glm-4-5-air-vs-laguna-m-1.md (~5,800 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/glm-4-5-air-vs-laguna-m-1.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/glm-4-5-air-vs-laguna-m-1
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

GLM-4.5-Air scores 59.1 (C) on agent readiness against Laguna M.1's 55.5 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- GLM-4.5-Air: C 59.1, rank #62 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/glm-4-5-air.min.md
- Laguna M.1: C 55.5, rank #79 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/laguna-m-1.min.md
- GLM-4.5-Air, good for Agents with two to four datacentre GPUs, or a provider account, who want a permissively licensed English and Chinese tool-calling model with wide runtime support. Ahead on Risk, 65 against 55.
- Laguna M.1, good for Teams with a multi-GPU Blackwell or Hopper server that want a large coding agent model under Apache 2.0.

| Category | GLM-4.5-Air | Laguna M.1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | 50 | 46 |
| Reach (25%) | 65 | 65 |
| Risk (20%) | 65 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 38 | 36 |

| Fact (where they differ) | GLM-4.5-Air | Laguna M.1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Z.ai (Zhipu AI) | Poolside |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2025-08-11 | 2026-07-14 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked |  |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |