# Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe (slim)

> Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP scores 69.5 (B) on agent readiness against Mistral Voxtral Transcribe's 64.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Mistral Voxtral Transcribe leads on transparency & trust. Both do speech stt. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes…

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gladia-stt-vs-mistral-voxtral-transcribe.md (~2,650 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gladia-stt-vs-mistral-voxtral-transcribe.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gladia-stt-vs-mistral-voxtral-transcribe
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP scores 69.5 (B) on agent readiness against Mistral Voxtral Transcribe's 64.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Mistral Voxtral Transcribe leads on transparency & trust. Both do speech stt.

- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP: B 69.5, rank #171 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gladia-stt.min.md
- Mistral Voxtral Transcribe: B 64.1, rank #329 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mistral-voxtral-transcribe.min.md
- Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP, good for Multilingual meetings and calls where translation, summaries and NER are wanted in one price, and for teams who want an MCP server. Ahead on Reliability, 60 against 53; Schema & documentation, 95 against 85; Maintenance & community, 80 against 66. Also Runs on your own machine; Free to start without a card; No incidents deducted, where Mistral Voxtral Transcribe loses 3 points for them.
- Mistral Voxtral Transcribe, good for Suited to low-cost batch transcription with diarisation in the 13 supported languages, and to live captions or voice agents that can run without speaker labels. Ahead on Transparency & trust, 82 against 64.

| Category | Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP | Mistral Voxtral Transcribe |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 53 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 95 | 85 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 75 | 77 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 70 | 70 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 80 | 66 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 64 | 82 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP | Mistral Voxtral Transcribe |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Gladia | Mistral AI |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.gladia.io/v2` | `https://api.mistral.ai/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, websocket |
| Licence | MIT (SDKs and MCP server) | Proprietary hosted service under Mistral's commercial terms. Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime weights and the SDKs are Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 8 | none |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-02-04 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-09-25 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-09-03 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 4 stars, 4.8k npm/wk, 126k PyPI/wk | 773 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |